This article is from the source 'bbc' and was first published or seen on . It will not be checked again for changes.

You can find the current article at its original source at http://news.bbc.co.uk/go/rss/-/1/hi/england/kent/7534645.stm

The article has changed 8 times. There is an RSS feed of changes available.

Version 1 Version 2
Bouncy castle ruling overturned Bouncy castle ruling overturned
(10 minutes later)
A couple found liable for an accident on a bouncy castle that left a boy with brain damage have won their appeal.A couple found liable for an accident on a bouncy castle that left a boy with brain damage have won their appeal.
Sam Harris, now 13, of Spalding, Lincolnshire, suffered a broken skull when a 15-year-old boy kicked his head at a party in Strood, Kent, in 2005.Sam Harris, now 13, of Spalding, Lincolnshire, suffered a broken skull when a 15-year-old boy kicked his head at a party in Strood, Kent, in 2005.
In May, a judge ruled that Timothy and Catherine Perry, from Rochester, had not provided enough supervision for the party on a field behind their home.In May, a judge ruled that Timothy and Catherine Perry, from Rochester, had not provided enough supervision for the party on a field behind their home.
Their lawyers argued they were the same as "parents up and down the land".Their lawyers argued they were the same as "parents up and down the land".
The couple were found liable for damages, estimated at more than £1m, for Sam, who now needs round-the-clock care. Sam brought the case to court through his mother, Janet HarrisThe couple were found liable for damages, estimated at more than £1m, for Sam, who now needs round-the-clock care.
The High Court was told the accident happened during the seconds that Mrs Perry had gone to help another child on another inflatable.The High Court was told the accident happened during the seconds that Mrs Perry had gone to help another child on another inflatable.
But her lawyers said the judge had applied the wrong test to the conduct of Mrs Perry.But her lawyers said the judge had applied the wrong test to the conduct of Mrs Perry.
Graham Eklund QC said: "He was wrong to find that uninterrupted supervision from a permanent look-out or a constant watch was necessary."
Sam brought the case against the Perrys through his mother Janet Harris, of Long Lane, Gedney Hill.