This article is from the source 'guardian' and was first published or seen on . It last changed over 40 days ago and won't be checked again for changes.

You can find the current article at its original source at https://www.theguardian.com/society/2017/aug/31/gambling-industry-third-party-companies-online-casinos

The article has changed 7 times. There is an RSS feed of changes available.

Version 1 Version 2
Revealed: how gambling industry targets poor people and ex-gamblers Revealed: how gambling industry targets poor people and ex-gamblers
(35 minutes later)
The gambling industry is using third-party companies to harvest people’s data, helping bookmakers and online casinos target people on low incomes and those who have stopped gambling, the Guardian can reveal.The gambling industry is using third-party companies to harvest people’s data, helping bookmakers and online casinos target people on low incomes and those who have stopped gambling, the Guardian can reveal.
Traditional online gambling ads have become more expensive, which has encouraged betting firms to resort to alternative means to hook consumers. This led to the increasing use of data analysis to win new customers, industry sources said.Traditional online gambling ads have become more expensive, which has encouraged betting firms to resort to alternative means to hook consumers. This led to the increasing use of data analysis to win new customers, industry sources said.
“Third-party data providers allowed us to target their email lists with precision,” said a digital marketer who counted betting companies among his clients before leaving his agency last year. “Lower-income users were among the most successfully targeted segments.“Third-party data providers allowed us to target their email lists with precision,” said a digital marketer who counted betting companies among his clients before leaving his agency last year. “Lower-income users were among the most successfully targeted segments.
“We could also combine segments, ie we could target users who are on less than £25k a year, own a credit card and have three kids, via these providers.”“We could also combine segments, ie we could target users who are on less than £25k a year, own a credit card and have three kids, via these providers.”
So-called “data houses” collect information on age, income, debt, credit information and insurance details, which they pass to betting affiliates – companies that refer customers to online bookmakers for a fee. This helps the affiliates and the gambling firms tailor ads and target people based on what they earn.So-called “data houses” collect information on age, income, debt, credit information and insurance details, which they pass to betting affiliates – companies that refer customers to online bookmakers for a fee. This helps the affiliates and the gambling firms tailor ads and target people based on what they earn.
The revelations will add to calls for tighter regulation of the gambling industry more action to address problem gambling after the news on Thursday that online betting firm 888 had been penalised a record £7.8m because more than 7,000 people who had voluntarily banned themselves from gambling were still able to access their accounts.The revelations will add to calls for tighter regulation of the gambling industry more action to address problem gambling after the news on Thursday that online betting firm 888 had been penalised a record £7.8m because more than 7,000 people who had voluntarily banned themselves from gambling were still able to access their accounts.
One customer was allowed to make 850,000 bets worth £1.3m in one year, using money stolen from their employer.One customer was allowed to make 850,000 bets worth £1.3m in one year, using money stolen from their employer.
A second recent former employee of a digital marketing company said that possible gamblers’ data are often harvested by means that the gamblers themselves may not fully understand.A second recent former employee of a digital marketing company said that possible gamblers’ data are often harvested by means that the gamblers themselves may not fully understand.
The data is often gathered from raffle sites that offer cash prizes and gifts in weekly giveaways, he said. To apply for the prize draws, users must usually provide their name, date of birth, email and address.The data is often gathered from raffle sites that offer cash prizes and gifts in weekly giveaways, he said. To apply for the prize draws, users must usually provide their name, date of birth, email and address.
He claimed raffle companies would then sell the data, something customers have sometimes unwittingly consented to in lengthy terms and conditions agreements. One such site states: “The following sectors [including gambling] are the industry types you can expect to receive products, information, services or special offers from.”He claimed raffle companies would then sell the data, something customers have sometimes unwittingly consented to in lengthy terms and conditions agreements. One such site states: “The following sectors [including gambling] are the industry types you can expect to receive products, information, services or special offers from.”
Advertising companies can then identify members of target demographics – often made up of people in lower-earning brackets – among the raffle entrants and use credit information to reach them.Advertising companies can then identify members of target demographics – often made up of people in lower-earning brackets – among the raffle entrants and use credit information to reach them.
They also use a method called “dynamic retargeting” to single out people who may not have gambled for a while and try to entice them to pick up the habit again – potentially luring back recovering addicts who have self-banned from these sites, thus undermining industry schemes.They also use a method called “dynamic retargeting” to single out people who may not have gambled for a while and try to entice them to pick up the habit again – potentially luring back recovering addicts who have self-banned from these sites, thus undermining industry schemes.
Those customers can be bombarded with sign-up ads that appear in their web browsers. In the first week, they can be offered a £10 free bet, the first industry source said, then £20 in week two, £30 in week three and so on. One source described these methods as “extremely effective”.Those customers can be bombarded with sign-up ads that appear in their web browsers. In the first week, they can be offered a £10 free bet, the first industry source said, then £20 in week two, £30 in week three and so on. One source described these methods as “extremely effective”.
The advertisers would also sell on the data of lapsed players to other vendors for affiliate fees.The advertisers would also sell on the data of lapsed players to other vendors for affiliate fees.
Betting affiliate programmes are schemes in which advertisers are paid a cost per acquisition and/or a lifetime revenue share percentage on the losses of each client they introduce. They are one of the gambling industry’s main sources of traffic. The fact that affiliates can never owe gaming sites money make the programmes risk free and potentially lucrative.Betting affiliate programmes are schemes in which advertisers are paid a cost per acquisition and/or a lifetime revenue share percentage on the losses of each client they introduce. They are one of the gambling industry’s main sources of traffic. The fact that affiliates can never owe gaming sites money make the programmes risk free and potentially lucrative.
Some betting affiliates, masquerading as tipsters via Facebook groups, build up a following on social media before posting a sign-up link, connected to their affiliate ID, which ensures they earn from their followers’ losses once they purposefully recommend they gamble on bets that are likely to lose.Some betting affiliates, masquerading as tipsters via Facebook groups, build up a following on social media before posting a sign-up link, connected to their affiliate ID, which ensures they earn from their followers’ losses once they purposefully recommend they gamble on bets that are likely to lose.
One regular gambler who responded to a Guardian callout said: “I fear that bookmakers are wilfully turning a blind eye to this practice and allowing such affiliates to promote their services in this manner.”One regular gambler who responded to a Guardian callout said: “I fear that bookmakers are wilfully turning a blind eye to this practice and allowing such affiliates to promote their services in this manner.”
Carolyn Harris, the Labour MP for Swansea East who has campaigned on gambling reform, said she was unsurprised by the practices. “It just reaffirms my belief that the betting industry has no moral compass and are capable of exploiting the vulnerable in order to obtain the last pound out of them,” she said.Carolyn Harris, the Labour MP for Swansea East who has campaigned on gambling reform, said she was unsurprised by the practices. “It just reaffirms my belief that the betting industry has no moral compass and are capable of exploiting the vulnerable in order to obtain the last pound out of them,” she said.
“We know this because nothing they do in terms of exclusion works and they are actively seeking out those who can least afford to be involved in gambling. I’m absolutely aghast that they use these hostile techniques in order to suck the life out of people. If we were to offer free cocaine to an addict, they’d find it very difficult to decline. The betting industry knows this and they are by token doing exactly the same thing.”“We know this because nothing they do in terms of exclusion works and they are actively seeking out those who can least afford to be involved in gambling. I’m absolutely aghast that they use these hostile techniques in order to suck the life out of people. If we were to offer free cocaine to an addict, they’d find it very difficult to decline. The betting industry knows this and they are by token doing exactly the same thing.”
While affiliates and tipsters are not directly licensed by the Gambling Commission, online gambling firms face action if connected businesses go too far. A spokesman for the commission, said: “The UK gambling advertising rules are strict and require betting and gaming to be promoted in a responsible way, and place a particular emphasis on protecting young and vulnerable people.”While affiliates and tipsters are not directly licensed by the Gambling Commission, online gambling firms face action if connected businesses go too far. A spokesman for the commission, said: “The UK gambling advertising rules are strict and require betting and gaming to be promoted in a responsible way, and place a particular emphasis on protecting young and vulnerable people.”
Clive Hawkswood, the chief executive of the Remote Gambling Association, said gambling operators should be aware that they could be held accountable for the actions of affiliates. “The affiliate sector itself needs to do more if it does not wish to attract a statutory licensing regime,” he said.Clive Hawkswood, the chief executive of the Remote Gambling Association, said gambling operators should be aware that they could be held accountable for the actions of affiliates. “The affiliate sector itself needs to do more if it does not wish to attract a statutory licensing regime,” he said.
‘Free bets would lure me back in’
Former gambler Justyn Larcombe, 47, from Kent, on how difficult it was to break his addiction
Gambling was an escape for me. It was a place I would go to when reality was too hard to bare. Reality was especially hard when I had lost a lot of money. I thought I could win it all back and it would all be OK.
I was addicted to the release of endorphins you get when you spend money you cannot afford but I was also addicted to the physical act of placing a bet.
As an addict, I self-excluded a few times from websites but then I would move house and sign up again with a new address. I would get an email from another site saying, here is a £50 free bet, and I convinced myself that wasn’t really gambling as it was free, so offers like that would lure me back in.
I would get into a pattern of self-excluding and then signing up again. It would have been so much easier if, when you self-excluded, you were just automatically blocked from all websites and there was no way back in. If there’s a loophole then it’s easy to take advantage of it.
I know some websites are also notoriously bad for not cracking down when people have self-excluded, so they will take some time to respond. Sometimes people can sign up again with just one digit different in their email, using the same name. It’s also really hard to self-exclude – they ask, are you sure? It’s a tiny little icon on the screen.
It’s not just online , high street self-exclusion is just as hard. I know from friends that they [shop employees] don’t always make proper checks and sometimes turnover of staff means people fall through the cracks.
I am no longer gambling but when I did it took over my life. It’s important that people have a way to get out and companies should help those who are addicted.
I didn’t gamble until I was 40 and saw an advert for an online £5 free bet which I took. I actually started placing bets because I found out my son had a disability at 11 months old and I think it was my way of coping with that.
Gambling took over my life. I ended up losing my wife, my house and my family. While I am not anti-gambling myself I know I would not place another bet again. I would love to see the industry making more effort to help problem gamblers.