This article is from the source 'guardian' and was first published or seen on . It last changed over 40 days ago and won't be checked again for changes.

You can find the current article at its original source at https://www.theguardian.com/politics/2017/sep/01/questions-for-labour-on-middle-east-position

The article has changed 6 times. There is an RSS feed of changes available.

Version 0 Version 1
Questions for Labour on Middle East position Questions on Labour’s Middle East position
(5 months later)
Letters
Fri 1 Sep 2017 18.32 BST
Last modified on Mon 27 Nov 2017 17.39 GMT
Share on Facebook
Share on Twitter
Share via Email
View more sharing options
Share on LinkedIn
Share on Pinterest
Share on Google+
Share on WhatsApp
Share on Messenger
Close
Roger van Zwanenberg (Blame China not CUP for censoring articles, Letters, 25 August) points up our double standards on free speech – criticising China but acquiescing in the domestic limitations imposed on criticism of Israel. A case in point is the migration in Labour’s position on Israel in less than three months. Between the much-praised radical Labour manifesto of June and the just-published national policy forum report, the interest groups have got to work.Roger van Zwanenberg (Blame China not CUP for censoring articles, Letters, 25 August) points up our double standards on free speech – criticising China but acquiescing in the domestic limitations imposed on criticism of Israel. A case in point is the migration in Labour’s position on Israel in less than three months. Between the much-praised radical Labour manifesto of June and the just-published national policy forum report, the interest groups have got to work.
All that is now left of Labour’s former position is “a commitment to a comprehensive peace based on a two-state solution: a secure Israel alongside a secure and viable state of Palestine”. What has been cut out? Oh, just things like an end to the blockade, occupation and settlements; pressure from Labour for an immediate return to meaningful negotiations leading to a diplomatic resolution. And the promise that a Labour government will immediately recognise the state of Palestine.All that is now left of Labour’s former position is “a commitment to a comprehensive peace based on a two-state solution: a secure Israel alongside a secure and viable state of Palestine”. What has been cut out? Oh, just things like an end to the blockade, occupation and settlements; pressure from Labour for an immediate return to meaningful negotiations leading to a diplomatic resolution. And the promise that a Labour government will immediately recognise the state of Palestine.
That’s how reduction in bandwidth of discussion is achieved in the UK – less centralised than in China, but highly effective.Jonathan RosenheadLondonThat’s how reduction in bandwidth of discussion is achieved in the UK – less centralised than in China, but highly effective.Jonathan RosenheadLondon
• Join the debate – email guardian.letters@theguardian.com• Join the debate – email guardian.letters@theguardian.com
• Read more Guardian letters – click here to visit gu.com/letters• Read more Guardian letters – click here to visit gu.com/letters
Labour
Middle East and North Africa
Israel
Palestinian territories
Manifestos 2017
General election 2017
letters
Share on Facebook
Share on Twitter
Share via Email
Share on LinkedIn
Share on Pinterest
Share on Google+
Share on WhatsApp
Share on Messenger
Reuse this content