This article is from the source 'guardian' and was first published or seen on . It last changed over 40 days ago and won't be checked again for changes.
You can find the current article at its original source at https://www.theguardian.com/education/2017/sep/07/systemic-problem-with-special-needs-provision
The article has changed 5 times. There is an RSS feed of changes available.
| Version 3 | Version 4 |
|---|---|
| Systemic problem with special needs provision | Systemic problem with special needs provision |
| (13 days later) | |
| John Harris is absolutely right to state that the implementation of special needs reforms and the introduction of education health care plans, and the ensuing lack of proper support for children with SEN, is “a big story” (Education, 5 September). It is, sadly, a story that has managed, somehow, not to receive the coverage it deserves. My experience of local authorities in the EHCP process is that the child is left unsupported and parents worn down by a constant failure to listen to their very real fears and concerns for their children. | John Harris is absolutely right to state that the implementation of special needs reforms and the introduction of education health care plans, and the ensuing lack of proper support for children with SEN, is “a big story” (Education, 5 September). It is, sadly, a story that has managed, somehow, not to receive the coverage it deserves. My experience of local authorities in the EHCP process is that the child is left unsupported and parents worn down by a constant failure to listen to their very real fears and concerns for their children. |
| My own daughter has complex medical needs that result in her often missing school; she was refused an assessment. I fought her case, took it to tribunal and won. The judge said the local authority’s opposition to my appeal was “incomprehensible”. My daughter was fortunate that before I became her full-time carer I was a barrister and therefore competent to fight for her. In the year and a half since her tribunal, I have supported other families and have seen them coping with huge levels of stress and their children denied assessments to which they were so clearly entitled. One child had been repeatedly denied support, excluded from school, her mental health needs so severe that she became suicidal and required an emergency admission to a psychiatric hospital. We have just, finally, managed to secure an EHCP for her, and an appropriate residential placement, but only after rejection piled upon rejection. Another child, a triplet with multiple medical needs, including the need to be fed by gastrostomy, was denied assessment because the LA would not accept that her medical needs had a significant impact on her ability to learn. | My own daughter has complex medical needs that result in her often missing school; she was refused an assessment. I fought her case, took it to tribunal and won. The judge said the local authority’s opposition to my appeal was “incomprehensible”. My daughter was fortunate that before I became her full-time carer I was a barrister and therefore competent to fight for her. In the year and a half since her tribunal, I have supported other families and have seen them coping with huge levels of stress and their children denied assessments to which they were so clearly entitled. One child had been repeatedly denied support, excluded from school, her mental health needs so severe that she became suicidal and required an emergency admission to a psychiatric hospital. We have just, finally, managed to secure an EHCP for her, and an appropriate residential placement, but only after rejection piled upon rejection. Another child, a triplet with multiple medical needs, including the need to be fed by gastrostomy, was denied assessment because the LA would not accept that her medical needs had a significant impact on her ability to learn. |
| This is a systemic problem; these are not isolated cases. There are many more cases, too, where parents do not have the confidence or tenacity to continue to push and push again when met only with refusal and resistance. LA decisions are clearly funding-driven and children are suffering. Susan HailesFowlmere, Cambridgeshire | This is a systemic problem; these are not isolated cases. There are many more cases, too, where parents do not have the confidence or tenacity to continue to push and push again when met only with refusal and resistance. LA decisions are clearly funding-driven and children are suffering. Susan HailesFowlmere, Cambridgeshire |
| • Join the debate – email guardian.letters@theguardian.com | • Join the debate – email guardian.letters@theguardian.com |
| • Read more Guardian letters – click here to visit gu.com/letters | • Read more Guardian letters – click here to visit gu.com/letters |
| Special educational needs | Special educational needs |
| Local politics | Local politics |
| Local government | Local government |
| Children | Children |
| Young people | Young people |
| letters | letters |
| Share on Facebook | Share on Facebook |
| Share on Twitter | Share on Twitter |
| Share via Email | Share via Email |
| Share on LinkedIn | Share on LinkedIn |
| Share on Pinterest | Share on Pinterest |
| Share on Google+ | Share on Google+ |
| Share on WhatsApp | Share on WhatsApp |
| Share on Messenger | Share on Messenger |
| Reuse this content | Reuse this content |