This article is from the source 'nytimes' and was first published or seen on . The next check for changes will be

You can find the current article at its original source at https://www.nytimes.com/2017/09/11/world/europe/norway-election.html

The article has changed 7 times. There is an RSS feed of changes available.

Version 2 Version 3
Norway Votes, in a Test of the Populist Right’s Strength Ruling Conservative-Led Bloc Wins Norway’s National Elections
(about 5 hours later)
OSLO — Voters in Norway cast ballots on Monday in the final day of national elections that are being seen as a referendum on taxes, immigration, energy policy and European integration. OSLO — The coalition led by the center-right Conservative Party won the final round of Norway’s national elections on Monday, in what was seen as a referendum on taxes, immigration, energy policy and European integration.
Western Europe’s top oil and gas producer, with a $1 trillion sovereign wealth fund and a reputation as one of the world’s happiest nations, Norway has been spared some of the polarization and discord that have afflicted major liberal democracies. With some 95 percent of the votes counted, Prime Minister Erna Solberg declared victory late Monday night. “We campaigned on new ideas and better solutions, and we have shown that those ideas work, she said. “We get four more years, because we have delivered results.”
Its politics shifted rightward in the last national elections, in 2013, when the center-right Conservative Party swept to power, after eight years of control by the center-left Labor Party. The Conservatives formed a coalition with the anti-tax, anti-immigration Progress Party, the first time that party, founded in 1973, has been part of government. Ms. Solberg, 56, and her main coalition partner, the anti-tax, anti-immigration Progress Party, will wind up with 89 seats in the unicameral, 169-seat Parliament, assuming they have the continued support of two smaller centrist parties. Another coalition led by the center-left Labor Party won 85 seats. Jonas Gahr Store, the leader of the Labor Party and Ms. Solbert’s chief opponent, called the results “a huge disappointment” in a concession speech. “We will learn and evaluate,” he added. “We are coming back to set the agenda for this country
The latest opinion polls showed the race to be neck and neck, far too close to predict which party might gain ultimate control of the unicameral, 169-seat Parliament. Norway, Western Europe’s top oil and gas producer with a $1 trillion sovereign wealth fund and a reputation as one of the world’s happiest nations has been spared some of the polarization and discord that have afflicted major liberal democracies. Its politics, though, did shift rightward in the last national elections, in 2013, when the Conservative Party came to power, after eight years of control by Labor.
In Norway, which has multiple parties and proportional voting, it is effectively impossible for any party to secure an outright majority, so much will depend on coalition negotiations that will begin once the number of seats won by each party becomes clear. Voting ends at 9 p.m., and the result may not be known until Tuesday morning at the earliest. In Norway, which has multiple parties and proportional voting, it is effectively impossible for any party to secure an outright majority.
Adding to the unpredictability, the Green Party, which wants to curb Arctic oil exploration by Norwegian companies, may well surpass the 4 percent threshold needed to enter Parliament with a larger group. Before the election, the Green Party, which advocates curbing Arctic oil exploration, seemed to have be gaining popularity and there was speculation that it could provide the edge to a Labor-led government. But the Greens won just one seat in Parliament, which is what they had before.
If Labor places first, it could find itself needing the Greens as a coalition partner a potentially momentous shift given that the Greens want to phase out Norway’s oil industry, a major source of its wealth. “From a comparative perspective,” Harald Baldersheim, a professor emeritus of political science at the University of Oslo, said before the race was decided, “Norwegian politics has never been and is not very polarized. Both blocs are gravitating toward the center. In this sense, not much is at stake.”
“It really could swing either way,” Harald Baldersheim, a professor emeritus of political science at the University of Oslo, said of the race. “From a comparative perspective,” he added, “Norwegian politics has never been and is not very polarized. Both blocs are gravitating toward the center. In this sense, not much is at stake.” The next government, Mr. Baldersheim said, will face pressure over Norway’s relationship with the European Union. Norway is not a member of the bloc, but, along with Iceland and Liechtenstein, it is part of the European Economic Area and the European internal market, and is governed by the same basic rules that guarantee the movement of goods, services, capital and people.
He added that the next government, whether led by the Conservatives or by Labor, would face pressure on Norway’s relationship with the European Union. Norway is not a member of the bloc, but along with Iceland and Liechtenstein it is part of the European Economic Area and the European internal market, and is governed by the same basic rules that guarantee the movement of goods, services, capital and people. As in Britain, which historically has had close ties to Norway, relations with Europe are a touchy subject, as is immigration. Norway’s population of 5.3 million is still fairly homogeneous, but it is becoming increasingly diverse.
As in Britain, which historically has close ties to Norway, relations with Europe are a touchy subject, as is immigration. Norway’s population of 5.3 million is still fairly homogeneous, but is increasingly diverse. The right-wing Progress Party, founded in 1973, is more moderate than its counterparts in Scandinavia: the far-right Sweden Democrats and the Danish People’s Party, which are largely considered outside the mainstream. Unlike those parties, the Progress Party has been part of day-to-day governance, controlling major portfolios like finance, transportation and oil.
The right-wing Progress Party is more moderate than its counterparts in Scandinavia, the far-right Sweden Democrats and the Danish People’s Party, which are largely considered outside the mainstream. Unlike those parties, the Progress Party has been part of day-to-day governance, controlling major portfolios like finance, transportation and oil.
“The four years of coalition government has tamed the Progress Party and made it harmless,” Mr. Baldersheim said.“The four years of coalition government has tamed the Progress Party and made it harmless,” Mr. Baldersheim said.
Svein Tore Marthinsen, an independent political commentator, said that the Progress Party had prompted a more restrictive stance on migration and asylum, some tax cuts and some increased spending on infrastructure, but that the party had not carried out its promise to reduce bureaucracy. Svein Tore Marthinsen, an independent political commentator, said that the Progress Party had prompted a more restrictive stance on migration and asylum, as well as some tax cuts and some increased spending on infrastructure, but that the party had not carried out its promise to reduce bureaucracy.
Prime Minister Erna Solberg, 56, is very likely to continue in power if her Conservative Party prevails. Her biggest opponent is Jonas Gahr Store, 57, the leader of the Labor Party, who has previously served as foreign minister and health minister, and began his career in public health. Mr. Gahr Store, 57, unusual for a Labor politician, is the heir to a fortune, in fireplace manufacturing. He has been criticized in the press for investing in overseas venture capital funds that do not abide by rules as strict as those followed by the sovereign wealth fund, which is commonly called the Oil Fund. Mr. Gahr Store, who has served as foreign minister and health minister, has also faced accusations in the news media of not paying full taxes on improvements to a country home that he made in 2011.
(Mr. Gahr Store was the foreign minister in 2008 when a suicide bomber struck a luxury hotel in Kabul, Afghanistan, where he was staying, an attack that killed six people, including the Norwegian journalist Carsten Thomassen.) Ms. Solberg ran a gaffe-free campaign, but faced pressure about provocative comments made by her hard-line integration and immigration minister, Sylvi Listhaug of the Progress Party, who recently caused a furor by saying that some immigrant-heavy areas of Sweden had become “no-go zones.”
Mr. Gahr Store, unusual for a Labor politician, is the heir to a fireplace-manufacturing fortune. He has been criticized in the press for investing in overseas venture capital funds that do not abide by rules as strict as those followed by the sovereign wealth fund, which is commonly called the Oil Fund. He has also faced accusations in the news mediaof not paying full taxes on upgrades to a country home that he undertook in 2011. Both candidates were active on social media. Mr. Gahr Store’s campaign posted footage of him voting on Facebook. Ms. Solberg used the platform to post a message thanking the Norwegian people “for letting me be your prime minister the last four years.”
Ms. Solberg has largely run a gaffe-free campaign, but has faced pressure about provocative comments made by her hard-line integration and immigration minister, Sylvi Listhaug of the Progress Party, who recently caused a furor by saying that some immigrant-heavy areas of Sweden had become “no-go zones.”
Both candidates have been active on social media. Mr. Gahr Store’s campaign posted footage of him voting on Facebook. Ms. Solberg used the platform to post a message thanking the Norwegian people “for letting me be your prime minister the last four years.”
On YouTube, as part of a campaign to stimulate youth engagement, the candidates were challenged to do impromptu sketches. (Ms. Solberg drew a school and a treasure chest to reflect her commitment to educational improvements and lower taxes; Mr. Gahr Store drew figures and a map that he said depicted his commitment to lowering climate emissions.)On YouTube, as part of a campaign to stimulate youth engagement, the candidates were challenged to do impromptu sketches. (Ms. Solberg drew a school and a treasure chest to reflect her commitment to educational improvements and lower taxes; Mr. Gahr Store drew figures and a map that he said depicted his commitment to lowering climate emissions.)
A third candidate, Trygve Slagsvold Vedum, the leader of the center-right Agrarian Party, is not likely to become prime minister, but has received attention for his resistance to the government’s plan to consolidate local governments. Mr. Slagsvold Vedum also wants Norway to renegotiate its economic arrangements with the European Union. He barnstormed the country during the campaign, and handed out 10,000 cups of coffee, by his estimate, while being trailed by chefs and musicians. A third candidate, Trygve Slagsvold Vedum, the leader of the center-right Agrarian Party received attention for his resistance to the government’s plan to consolidate local governments. Mr. Slagsvold Vedum also called for Norway to renegotiate its economic arrangements with the European Union. He barnstormed the country during the campaign and handed out 10,000 cups of coffee, by his estimate, while being trailed by chefs and musicians.
Voter turnout in Norway is typically high; in the 2013 elections, it exceeded 78 percent.Voter turnout in Norway is typically high; in the 2013 elections, it exceeded 78 percent.