This article is from the source 'guardian' and was first published or seen on . It last changed over 40 days ago and won't be checked again for changes.
You can find the current article at its original source at https://www.theguardian.com/environment/2017/sep/20/nuclear-is-not-the-way-to-a-clean-energy-future
The article has changed 4 times. There is an RSS feed of changes available.
| Version 2 | Version 3 |
|---|---|
| Nuclear is not the way to a clean energy future | Nuclear is not the way to a clean energy future |
| (5 days later) | |
| In Agneta Rising’s defence of nuclear generation (Letters, 19 September), she claims that nuclear plants have to occasionally stop for repair and maintenance. But jellyfish also get into seawater inlets, as at Torness in 2011, causing week-long shutdowns. Seaweed can block inlets shutting reactors, and operator incompetence shuts reactors and compromises radioactive cores. Torness was even narrowly missed by a crashing RAF Tornado jet. Most worrying are not such transient manageable events but risks of systematic flooding of nuclear sites. | In Agneta Rising’s defence of nuclear generation (Letters, 19 September), she claims that nuclear plants have to occasionally stop for repair and maintenance. But jellyfish also get into seawater inlets, as at Torness in 2011, causing week-long shutdowns. Seaweed can block inlets shutting reactors, and operator incompetence shuts reactors and compromises radioactive cores. Torness was even narrowly missed by a crashing RAF Tornado jet. Most worrying are not such transient manageable events but risks of systematic flooding of nuclear sites. |
| Nine UK plants are assessed by Defra as currently vulnerable to coastal flooding (Report, 7 March 2012), including all eight proposed new UK nuclear sites and numerous radioactive waste stores, operating reactors and defunct nuclear facilities. EDF claims on its website that “to protect the Hinkley Point C station from such events, the platform level of the site is set at 14 metres above sea level, behind a sea wall with a crest level of 13.5 metres”. Hurricane Katrina in 2005 produced a maximum storm surge of 8.5 metres. It is predicted that sea levels may rise by a metre by 2100. The UK government cannot actually have believed in climate change or surely they would not put future generations at such risk? I bet they believe in it now. The question is: do they care? Is it really too late to stop a retrograde, potentially catastrophic and already unaffordable UK nuclear future?Emeritus Professor Sue RoafOxford | Nine UK plants are assessed by Defra as currently vulnerable to coastal flooding (Report, 7 March 2012), including all eight proposed new UK nuclear sites and numerous radioactive waste stores, operating reactors and defunct nuclear facilities. EDF claims on its website that “to protect the Hinkley Point C station from such events, the platform level of the site is set at 14 metres above sea level, behind a sea wall with a crest level of 13.5 metres”. Hurricane Katrina in 2005 produced a maximum storm surge of 8.5 metres. It is predicted that sea levels may rise by a metre by 2100. The UK government cannot actually have believed in climate change or surely they would not put future generations at such risk? I bet they believe in it now. The question is: do they care? Is it really too late to stop a retrograde, potentially catastrophic and already unaffordable UK nuclear future?Emeritus Professor Sue RoafOxford |
| • I accept David Lowry’s critique that nuclear power generation is not uninterrupted or carbon-free (Letters, 18 September), and the need for back-up generating capacity. Gas cannot be the long-term, or even mid-term, solution, however. I am surprised that no mention is made of nuclear fusion as a long-term alternative to fission. A technology of profound challenges, nonetheless it is being actively researched around the world, with China allegedly investing billions in an attempt to lead the world in this. | • I accept David Lowry’s critique that nuclear power generation is not uninterrupted or carbon-free (Letters, 18 September), and the need for back-up generating capacity. Gas cannot be the long-term, or even mid-term, solution, however. I am surprised that no mention is made of nuclear fusion as a long-term alternative to fission. A technology of profound challenges, nonetheless it is being actively researched around the world, with China allegedly investing billions in an attempt to lead the world in this. |
| The UK has an admirable record of achievement in the field, culminating in the Joint European Torus (JET) project. However, costs are huge, hence the establishment of the European Fusion Development Agreement (EFDA) whereby EU nations and Switzerland can share costs, allow full participation and share benefits. Full-scale implementation of this technology is probably decades in development but offers a viable, non-carbon and sustainable support to the burgeoning solar and allied technologies. But will our muddled Brexit exclude the UK from such participation?David BridgewaterPershore, Worcestershire | The UK has an admirable record of achievement in the field, culminating in the Joint European Torus (JET) project. However, costs are huge, hence the establishment of the European Fusion Development Agreement (EFDA) whereby EU nations and Switzerland can share costs, allow full participation and share benefits. Full-scale implementation of this technology is probably decades in development but offers a viable, non-carbon and sustainable support to the burgeoning solar and allied technologies. But will our muddled Brexit exclude the UK from such participation?David BridgewaterPershore, Worcestershire |
| • Professor Allen and colleagues’ predictions that global warming may be limited are qualified by the proviso that “other greenhouse gases such as methane are controlled” (Global warming goal of under 1.5C can be met, scientists say, 19 September). However, there is no room for complacency in the fight to reduce anthropogenic emissions and to keep warming to an absolute minimum, as recent and ongoing research suggest that any warming at all leads to disproportionately higher natural emissions of these other greenhouse gases (specifically methane and nitrous oxide).Dr Kevin PurdyReader in microbial ecology, University of Warwick | • Professor Allen and colleagues’ predictions that global warming may be limited are qualified by the proviso that “other greenhouse gases such as methane are controlled” (Global warming goal of under 1.5C can be met, scientists say, 19 September). However, there is no room for complacency in the fight to reduce anthropogenic emissions and to keep warming to an absolute minimum, as recent and ongoing research suggest that any warming at all leads to disproportionately higher natural emissions of these other greenhouse gases (specifically methane and nitrous oxide).Dr Kevin PurdyReader in microbial ecology, University of Warwick |
| • Following the 2011 Fukushima disaster, Angela Merkel (Who’s the world’s leading eco-vandal? It’s Angela Merkel?, 20 September) closed eight nuclear power plants immediately and ruled that the remainder would close by 2022, instead of 2032. The premature closure of these plants means the construction of nine coal-fired power stations, burning dirty brown coal, with an expected life of more than 50 years.Dr John DohertyVienna, Austria | • Following the 2011 Fukushima disaster, Angela Merkel (Who’s the world’s leading eco-vandal? It’s Angela Merkel?, 20 September) closed eight nuclear power plants immediately and ruled that the remainder would close by 2022, instead of 2032. The premature closure of these plants means the construction of nine coal-fired power stations, burning dirty brown coal, with an expected life of more than 50 years.Dr John DohertyVienna, Austria |
| • In the letters you published about the place of nuclear power in our energy mix, there are no references to the disposal of nuclear waste. Have we forgotten so soon?John StarbuckHuddersfield, West Yorkshire | • In the letters you published about the place of nuclear power in our energy mix, there are no references to the disposal of nuclear waste. Have we forgotten so soon?John StarbuckHuddersfield, West Yorkshire |
| • Join the debate – email guardian.letters@theguardian.com | • Join the debate – email guardian.letters@theguardian.com |
| • Read more Guardian letters – click here to visit gu.com/letters | • Read more Guardian letters – click here to visit gu.com/letters |
| Nuclear power | Nuclear power |
| Energy | Energy |
| Nuclear waste | Nuclear waste |
| Waste | Waste |
| Angela Merkel | Angela Merkel |
| Gas | Gas |
| letters | letters |
| Share on Facebook | Share on Facebook |
| Share on Twitter | Share on Twitter |
| Share via Email | Share via Email |
| Share on LinkedIn | Share on LinkedIn |
| Share on Pinterest | Share on Pinterest |
| Share on Google+ | Share on Google+ |
| Share on WhatsApp | Share on WhatsApp |
| Share on Messenger | Share on Messenger |
| Reuse this content | Reuse this content |