This article is from the source 'guardian' and was first published or seen on . It last changed over 40 days ago and won't be checked again for changes.

You can find the current article at its original source at https://www.theguardian.com/world/2017/sep/27/letter-liliane-bettencourt-obituary

The article has changed 5 times. There is an RSS feed of changes available.

Version 0 Version 1
Letter: Liliane Bettencourt’s life was a sort of tragic feminist parable Letter: Liliane Bettencourt’s life was a sort of tragic feminist parable
(4 months later)
Ruth Brandon
Wed 27 Sep 2017 18.20 BST
Last modified on Mon 27 Nov 2017 16.19 GMT
Share on Facebook
Share on Twitter
Share via Email
View more sharing options
Share on LinkedIn
Share on Pinterest
Share on Google+
Share on WhatsApp
Share on Messenger
Close
The life of Liliane Bettencourt was a sort of tragic feminist parable. Like many big 1930s industrialists, her father, Eugène Schueller, evolved a detailed social philosophy. In his view women should stay home and not take jobs from men, and only money, not businesses, should be considered heritable. On both counts, Liliane, his only daughter, was excluded from taking any active part in life.The life of Liliane Bettencourt was a sort of tragic feminist parable. Like many big 1930s industrialists, her father, Eugène Schueller, evolved a detailed social philosophy. In his view women should stay home and not take jobs from men, and only money, not businesses, should be considered heritable. On both counts, Liliane, his only daughter, was excluded from taking any active part in life.
Ironically, the scandal that brought to light the wartime activities of Schueller and Liliane’s husband, André Bettencourt, arose as a result of L’Oréal’s takeover of the Helena Rubinstein beauty business in 1988 – a takeover orchestrated by one of Schueller’s wartime associates, Jacques Corrèze, whom Schueller had taken on after the war when L’Oréal became a sort of employment agency for disgraced collaborators.Ironically, the scandal that brought to light the wartime activities of Schueller and Liliane’s husband, André Bettencourt, arose as a result of L’Oréal’s takeover of the Helena Rubinstein beauty business in 1988 – a takeover orchestrated by one of Schueller’s wartime associates, Jacques Corrèze, whom Schueller had taken on after the war when L’Oréal became a sort of employment agency for disgraced collaborators.
Rubinstein, a poor girl from the Krakow ghetto, built up her own business and continued vividly to direct its every activity until the day she died, in 1965, aged 93. By contrast her father’s real legacy to Liliane was that she inherited all the money and none of the power.Rubinstein, a poor girl from the Krakow ghetto, built up her own business and continued vividly to direct its every activity until the day she died, in 1965, aged 93. By contrast her father’s real legacy to Liliane was that she inherited all the money and none of the power.
Her sole function was to act as a money fountain for the various men in her life: first her husband and his political party, then Banier, her parasitic friend, and finally the various wealth managers and advisers who took every opportunity to take advantage of her.Her sole function was to act as a money fountain for the various men in her life: first her husband and his political party, then Banier, her parasitic friend, and finally the various wealth managers and advisers who took every opportunity to take advantage of her.
“Work,” Rubinstein liked to say, “has been my best beauty treatment.”“Work,” Rubinstein liked to say, “has been my best beauty treatment.”
The L’Oréal heir was denied it and suffered sadly as a consequence.The L’Oréal heir was denied it and suffered sadly as a consequence.
France
Makeup
obituaries
Share on Facebook
Share on Twitter
Share via Email
Share on LinkedIn
Share on Pinterest
Share on Google+
Share on WhatsApp
Share on Messenger
Reuse this content