This article is from the source 'guardian' and was first published or seen on . It last changed over 40 days ago and won't be checked again for changes.

You can find the current article at its original source at https://www.theguardian.com/world/2017/sep/28/israel-occupies-small-fraction-of-west-bank-claims-us-ambassador

The article has changed 9 times. There is an RSS feed of changes available.

Version 0 Version 1
Israel only occupies 2% of West Bank, says US ambassador Israel only occupies 2% of West Bank, says US ambassador
(35 minutes later)
The US ambassador to Israel, David Friedman, has made a second dramatic intervention in US Middle East policy, suggesting that only 2% of the West Bank is occupied by Israel and that the international community always intended for Israel to keep some of the land it seized in 1967 during the six-day war.The US ambassador to Israel, David Friedman, has made a second dramatic intervention in US Middle East policy, suggesting that only 2% of the West Bank is occupied by Israel and that the international community always intended for Israel to keep some of the land it seized in 1967 during the six-day war.
The comments, in an interview with the news channel Israeli Walla, came a day after rightwing Israeli politicians celebrated 50 years of Israeli settlement-building, prompting condemnation by Palestinian officials.The comments, in an interview with the news channel Israeli Walla, came a day after rightwing Israeli politicians celebrated 50 years of Israeli settlement-building, prompting condemnation by Palestinian officials.
“I think the settlements are part of Israel,” Friedman said, comments that seem at odds with decades of US foreign policy.“I think the settlements are part of Israel,” Friedman said, comments that seem at odds with decades of US foreign policy.
“I think that was always the expectation when resolution 242 was adopted in 1967,” he said, referring to the UN security council resolution made at the end of the six-day war, when Israeli forces occupied the West Bank and Gaza Strip.“I think that was always the expectation when resolution 242 was adopted in 1967,” he said, referring to the UN security council resolution made at the end of the six-day war, when Israeli forces occupied the West Bank and Gaza Strip.
Friedman, a former personal lawyer of Donald Trump who had no experience in diplomacy before his appointment, was regarded as being a strong supporter of Jewish settlement before he was named as ambassador.Friedman, a former personal lawyer of Donald Trump who had no experience in diplomacy before his appointment, was regarded as being a strong supporter of Jewish settlement before he was named as ambassador.
“The idea was that Israel would be entitled to secure borders,” he told Israeli Walla. “The existing borders, the 1967 borders, were viewed by everybody as not secure, so Israel would retain a meaningful portion of the West Bank, and it would return that which it didn’t need for peace and security.“The idea was that Israel would be entitled to secure borders,” he told Israeli Walla. “The existing borders, the 1967 borders, were viewed by everybody as not secure, so Israel would retain a meaningful portion of the West Bank, and it would return that which it didn’t need for peace and security.
“So there was always supposed to be some notion of expansion into the West Bank, but not necessarily expansion into the entire West Bank.“So there was always supposed to be some notion of expansion into the West Bank, but not necessarily expansion into the entire West Bank.
“And I think that’s exactly what Israel has done. I mean, they’re only occupying 2% of the West Bank. There is important nationalistic, historical [and] religious significance to those settlements, and I think the settlers view themselves as Israelis and Israel views the settlers as Israelis.”“And I think that’s exactly what Israel has done. I mean, they’re only occupying 2% of the West Bank. There is important nationalistic, historical [and] religious significance to those settlements, and I think the settlers view themselves as Israelis and Israel views the settlers as Israelis.”
Resolution 242 demanded the “withdrawal of Israel armed forces from territories occupied in the recent conflict” while “emphasising the inadmissibility of the acquisition of territory by war”.Resolution 242 demanded the “withdrawal of Israel armed forces from territories occupied in the recent conflict” while “emphasising the inadmissibility of the acquisition of territory by war”.
Condemning Friedman’s remarks, which he said showed a misunderstanding of resolution 242, a Palestinian official told the Guardian: “Israel occupies 100% of the West Bank. If I was a US citizen I would be extremely concerned that my ambassador in Israel is using his position to try to emphasise the importance of settlements to Israel.” Nabil Shaath, an adviser to Palestinian president Mahmoud Abbas, told the Guardian: “Sometimes ambassadors can be ignorant and sometimes they can be biased but this is completely ignorant, not just of US policy but the fact that the occupation refers to the whole of the West Bank and east Jerusalem.
“It also shows a complete ignorance of resolution 242, in which there is no reference to settlements.
“If this is a preview of President Trump’s ultimate deal, I shudder, but we have a situation where decision making capability and soundness of judgement is totally lacking.”
Another Palestinian official said: “Israel occupies 100% of the West Bank. If I was a US citizen I would be extremely concerned that my ambassador in Israel is using his position to try to emphasise the importance of settlements to Israel.”
It is the second time in as many months that Friedman has courted controversy with his views on Israel’s occupation and Jewish settlements, after he referred to “the alleged occupation” in an interview with the Jerusalem Post.It is the second time in as many months that Friedman has courted controversy with his views on Israel’s occupation and Jewish settlements, after he referred to “the alleged occupation” in an interview with the Jerusalem Post.
There is mounting concern among Palestinian officials over what they see as a bias towards Israel in the Trump administration’s much vaunted hopes for a peace deal between Israelis and Palestinians, not least over the Trump administration’s continuing refusal to commit itself to a two-state solution.There is mounting concern among Palestinian officials over what they see as a bias towards Israel in the Trump administration’s much vaunted hopes for a peace deal between Israelis and Palestinians, not least over the Trump administration’s continuing refusal to commit itself to a two-state solution.
For his own part, before taking up his current post Friedman voiced opposition to a two-state solution to the Israel-Palestine crisis.For his own part, before taking up his current post Friedman voiced opposition to a two-state solution to the Israel-Palestine crisis.
A highly controversial pick for the role of ambassador, Friedman had also called Barack Obama an antisemite and suggested US Jews who opposed the Israeli occupation of the West Bank were worse than kapos, Nazi-era prisoners who served as concentration camp guards.A highly controversial pick for the role of ambassador, Friedman had also called Barack Obama an antisemite and suggested US Jews who opposed the Israeli occupation of the West Bank were worse than kapos, Nazi-era prisoners who served as concentration camp guards.
When he was announced as ambassador-designate, liberal Jewish groups in the US denounced his appointment as “reckless”, describing Friedman as the “least experienced pick” ever for a US ambassador to Israel.When he was announced as ambassador-designate, liberal Jewish groups in the US denounced his appointment as “reckless”, describing Friedman as the “least experienced pick” ever for a US ambassador to Israel.