This article is from the source 'guardian' and was first published or seen on . It last changed over 40 days ago and won't be checked again for changes.

You can find the current article at its original source at https://www.theguardian.com/uk-news/2017/oct/09/boys--narcissistic-cult-mindset-removed-from-mothers-care-judge

The article has changed 3 times. There is an RSS feed of changes available.

Version 0 Version 1
Boys with ‘narcissistic cult’ mindset removed from mother’s care Boys with ‘narcissistic cult’ mindset removed from mother’s care
(4 months later)
Three teenage brothers, who believed they were intellectually superior, had suffered physical and emotional harm, judge told
Press Association
Mon 9 Oct 2017 13.16 BST
Last modified on Mon 27 Nov 2017 15.45 GMT
Share on Facebook
Share on Twitter
Share via Email
View more sharing options
Share on LinkedIn
Share on Pinterest
Share on Google+
Share on WhatsApp
Share on Messenger
Close
Three teenage brothers who developed a “narcissistic cult” mentality and came to believe there was no point leaving home, socialising or going to school should leave their mother’s care, a high court judge has concluded.Three teenage brothers who developed a “narcissistic cult” mentality and came to believe there was no point leaving home, socialising or going to school should leave their mother’s care, a high court judge has concluded.
They formed a group identity and saw themselves as intellectually superior and separate to the rest of the world, psychotherapists told Mr Justice Hayden.They formed a group identity and saw themselves as intellectually superior and separate to the rest of the world, psychotherapists told Mr Justice Hayden.
Two of the boys spoke to each other in a language they had devised, the judge heard.Two of the boys spoke to each other in a language they had devised, the judge heard.
Details of the case have emerged in a ruling by Hayden after a private hearing in the family division of the high court in central London. The judge said the family involved could not be identified.Details of the case have emerged in a ruling by Hayden after a private hearing in the family division of the high court in central London. The judge said the family involved could not be identified.
He said social services bosses at Wandsworth council in south London had responsibility for the boys’ welfare and had asked him to make a decision about their future.He said social services bosses at Wandsworth council in south London had responsibility for the boys’ welfare and had asked him to make a decision about their future.
Social workers had raised a series of concerns and said the children had suffered neglect plus physical and emotional harm due to stress, inadequate food and a lack of medical provision.Social workers had raised a series of concerns and said the children had suffered neglect plus physical and emotional harm due to stress, inadequate food and a lack of medical provision.
They said the boys had not had appropriate exercise and outdoor activity. Their mother, who had mental health issues, had “failed” to allow them to attend school, socialise, play outside or take part in activities.They said the boys had not had appropriate exercise and outdoor activity. Their mother, who had mental health issues, had “failed” to allow them to attend school, socialise, play outside or take part in activities.
Social services bosses said the boys had come to believe there was no purpose to attending school, leaving the home or socialising with others.Social services bosses said the boys had come to believe there was no purpose to attending school, leaving the home or socialising with others.
The judge said he had been told of an achievement and award system operating at the boys’ home.The judge said he had been told of an achievement and award system operating at the boys’ home.
“There was an elaborate and quite rigid structure to their interactions predicated on an achievement and award system,” he said. “Achievement of particular tasks enabled time on the computer or an opportunity to pet and stroke the cat.”“There was an elaborate and quite rigid structure to their interactions predicated on an achievement and award system,” he said. “Achievement of particular tasks enabled time on the computer or an opportunity to pet and stroke the cat.”
Hayden indicated that the boys had been placed in residential care units temporarily pending a long-term decision on their future. He said they should remain where they were and not return to their mother’s care.Hayden indicated that the boys had been placed in residential care units temporarily pending a long-term decision on their future. He said they should remain where they were and not return to their mother’s care.
The judge made the decision after analysing legal argument from barristers Julien Foster, Rachel Gillman, and Lucy Sprinz.The judge made the decision after analysing legal argument from barristers Julien Foster, Rachel Gillman, and Lucy Sprinz.
London
Mental health
Health
news
Share on Facebook
Share on Twitter
Share via Email
Share on LinkedIn
Share on Pinterest
Share on Google+
Share on WhatsApp
Share on Messenger
Reuse this content