This article is from the source 'guardian' and was first published or seen on . It last changed over 40 days ago and won't be checked again for changes.
You can find the current article at its original source at https://www.theguardian.com/media/2017/oct/15/harvey-weinstein-cowardice-press-changing-times
The article has changed 4 times. There is an RSS feed of changes available.
| Version 1 | Version 2 |
|---|---|
| Harvey Weinstein was protected for decades by the cowardice of the press | Harvey Weinstein was protected for decades by the cowardice of the press |
| (17 days later) | |
| Sun 15 Oct 2017 07.00 BST | Sun 15 Oct 2017 07.00 BST |
| Last modified on Wed 14 Feb 2018 16.28 GMT | |
| Share on Facebook | Share on Facebook |
| Share on Twitter | Share on Twitter |
| Share via Email | Share via Email |
| View more sharing options | View more sharing options |
| Share on LinkedIn | Share on LinkedIn |
| Share on Pinterest | Share on Pinterest |
| Share on Google+ | Share on Google+ |
| Share on WhatsApp | Share on WhatsApp |
| Share on Messenger | Share on Messenger |
| Close | Close |
| Applause for the New York Times, the New Yorker and for a sudden flood of witnesses putting Harvey Weinstein out of seedy, personal business. But Ryan Holiday in the New York Observer asks a cruel question. “How did the collective press – the Hollywood, media, gossip, and business journalists who follow every move of these power players as part of their job – miss out so badly?” | Applause for the New York Times, the New Yorker and for a sudden flood of witnesses putting Harvey Weinstein out of seedy, personal business. But Ryan Holiday in the New York Observer asks a cruel question. “How did the collective press – the Hollywood, media, gossip, and business journalists who follow every move of these power players as part of their job – miss out so badly?” |
| His answer: they didn’t, they were just “too cowardly” to print it, with examples of studied silence going back to 2000 and 2004, never mind NBC this very year. What he doesn’t quite say – the Jimmy Savile memorial lecture – is that 10, 20 or 30 years makes a huge difference to what society will tolerate in the momentum of exposure. Nothing to be proud of. But that was then, and this outbreak of revulsion and testimony is now. | His answer: they didn’t, they were just “too cowardly” to print it, with examples of studied silence going back to 2000 and 2004, never mind NBC this very year. What he doesn’t quite say – the Jimmy Savile memorial lecture – is that 10, 20 or 30 years makes a huge difference to what society will tolerate in the momentum of exposure. Nothing to be proud of. But that was then, and this outbreak of revulsion and testimony is now. |
| • Think of an edited account of great press coverage like the Week. It’s a magazine and subject to all the bits of law and regulation that with that status. Then think of Google News or indeed any Facebook news coverage you care to name. They’re “platforms”, not publications, or so the tech giants claim even as - in Facebook’s case - they hire another thousand monitors to weed out offensive postings or ads. It’s becoming a difference without a meaning (as the chair of Ofcom told MPs last week). Regulation on an equal footing is becoming inevitable. That’s only Patricia Hodgson’s own personal view, she insists. But, in this debate, it’s also a watershed. | • Think of an edited account of great press coverage like the Week. It’s a magazine and subject to all the bits of law and regulation that with that status. Then think of Google News or indeed any Facebook news coverage you care to name. They’re “platforms”, not publications, or so the tech giants claim even as - in Facebook’s case - they hire another thousand monitors to weed out offensive postings or ads. It’s becoming a difference without a meaning (as the chair of Ofcom told MPs last week). Regulation on an equal footing is becoming inevitable. That’s only Patricia Hodgson’s own personal view, she insists. But, in this debate, it’s also a watershed. |
| New York Times | New York Times |
| Peter Preston on press and broadcasting | Peter Preston on press and broadcasting |
| The New Yorker | The New Yorker |
| Harvey Weinstein | Harvey Weinstein |
| US press and publishing | US press and publishing |
| Newspapers | Newspapers |
| comment | comment |
| Share on Facebook | Share on Facebook |
| Share on Twitter | Share on Twitter |
| Share via Email | Share via Email |
| Share on LinkedIn | Share on LinkedIn |
| Share on Pinterest | Share on Pinterest |
| Share on Google+ | Share on Google+ |
| Share on WhatsApp | Share on WhatsApp |
| Share on Messenger | Share on Messenger |
| Reuse this content | Reuse this content |