This article is from the source 'guardian' and was first published or seen on . It last changed over 40 days ago and won't be checked again for changes.
You can find the current article at its original source at https://www.theguardian.com/education/2017/oct/31/oxford-academic-claims-trump-protest-led-to-excommunication
The article has changed 9 times. There is an RSS feed of changes available.
| Version 6 | Version 7 |
|---|---|
| Oxford academic claims Trump protest led to 'excommunication' | Oxford academic claims Trump protest led to 'excommunication' |
| (about 14 hours later) | |
| Prof Bo Rothstein, who resigned over university patron’s support for Trump inauguration, claims he was banned from school and contacting students | |
| Matthew Weaver | |
| Tue 31 Oct 2017 17.21 GMT | |
| First published on Tue 31 Oct 2017 13.00 GMT | |
| Share on Facebook | |
| Share on Twitter | |
| Share via Email | |
| View more sharing options | |
| Share on LinkedIn | |
| Share on Pinterest | |
| Share on Google+ | |
| Share on WhatsApp | |
| Share on Messenger | |
| Close | |
| The University of Oxford is to look into claims that it tried to “excommunicate” a leading politics academic after he resigned over a key patron’s support for Donald Trump’s inauguration. | The University of Oxford is to look into claims that it tried to “excommunicate” a leading politics academic after he resigned over a key patron’s support for Donald Trump’s inauguration. |
| Prof Bo Rothstein was the Blavatnik chair of government and public policy – a post named after Leonard Blavatnik, the Ukrainian-born billionaire who gave £75m to the university to set up the Blavatnik school of government. | Prof Bo Rothstein was the Blavatnik chair of government and public policy – a post named after Leonard Blavatnik, the Ukrainian-born billionaire who gave £75m to the university to set up the Blavatnik school of government. |
| He resigned in August after claiming Blavatnik’s donation of $1m (£753,000) to Trump’s inauguration committee made his position untenable. | He resigned in August after claiming Blavatnik’s donation of $1m (£753,000) to Trump’s inauguration committee made his position untenable. |
| After his criticism, Rothstein said the school insisted he resign immediately rather than serve out the usual notice period of a full academic term. | After his criticism, Rothstein said the school insisted he resign immediately rather than serve out the usual notice period of a full academic term. |
| In a letter sent to Oxford’s vice-chancellor, Louise Richardson, early this month, Rothstein complained that he was banned from the school and contact with his students, in breach of his academic freedom. | In a letter sent to Oxford’s vice-chancellor, Louise Richardson, early this month, Rothstein complained that he was banned from the school and contact with his students, in breach of his academic freedom. |
| The school strenuously refutes his claims. | The school strenuously refutes his claims. |
| In the letter, shared with the Guardian, Rothstein says: “This policy of excommunication stands in conflict with the principles of academic freedom and freedom of expression. | In the letter, shared with the Guardian, Rothstein says: “This policy of excommunication stands in conflict with the principles of academic freedom and freedom of expression. |
| “According to these principles, I have the right to resign and also have the right to state my reasons for resigning to whomever I want without being banned from my workplace.” | “According to these principles, I have the right to resign and also have the right to state my reasons for resigning to whomever I want without being banned from my workplace.” |
| It concluded: “I cannot imagine that the University of Oxford wants to be known as a place where the prize for criticising one of the major donors to the university is excommunication.” | It concluded: “I cannot imagine that the University of Oxford wants to be known as a place where the prize for criticising one of the major donors to the university is excommunication.” |
| In a response sent last week, Richardson said she had asked her chief of staff to investigate the matter. She added: “Academic freedom and freedom of speech are two principles which sit at the heart of this university.” | In a response sent last week, Richardson said she had asked her chief of staff to investigate the matter. She added: “Academic freedom and freedom of speech are two principles which sit at the heart of this university.” |
| Rothstein told the Guardian he welcomed Richardson’s response, but he added: “My experience from other people in her position in matters like this is not, shall we say, encouraging.” | Rothstein told the Guardian he welcomed Richardson’s response, but he added: “My experience from other people in her position in matters like this is not, shall we say, encouraging.” |
| In his letter to her, Rothstein said he was told he was banned from the school with immediate effect because his decision to resign “had created much animosity among staff and faculty”. | In his letter to her, Rothstein said he was told he was banned from the school with immediate effect because his decision to resign “had created much animosity among staff and faculty”. |
| He confirmed that two of his former colleagues had expressed “much anger” at his resignation. But six other faculty members said they respected his decision, he told Richardson. | He confirmed that two of his former colleagues had expressed “much anger” at his resignation. But six other faculty members said they respected his decision, he told Richardson. |
| He accused the school of behaving like a business rather than an academic institution and setting a bad example to students. He also said the school had missed an opportunity to uphold the primacy of academic freedom. | He accused the school of behaving like a business rather than an academic institution and setting a bad example to students. He also said the school had missed an opportunity to uphold the primacy of academic freedom. |
| His letter says: “I think the leadership of the school should have used this situation as a teaching moment for faculty, staff and students to educate them that in academia we do not expel people with whom we disagree … The way this has been handled may be typical for a private business organisation, but the idea of academic freedom speaks another language.” | His letter says: “I think the leadership of the school should have used this situation as a teaching moment for faculty, staff and students to educate them that in academia we do not expel people with whom we disagree … The way this has been handled may be typical for a private business organisation, but the idea of academic freedom speaks another language.” |
| At the time of Rothstein’s resignation the university said it could not understand his decision because Blavatnik’s donation to Trump’s inauguration was unconnected to the Blavatnik school of government. | At the time of Rothstein’s resignation the university said it could not understand his decision because Blavatnik’s donation to Trump’s inauguration was unconnected to the Blavatnik school of government. |
| A spokesman for Blavatnik’s company, Access Industries, confirmed that it made a $1m donation to Trump’s inauguration committee, but denied it was a significant supporter of Trump. | A spokesman for Blavatnik’s company, Access Industries, confirmed that it made a $1m donation to Trump’s inauguration committee, but denied it was a significant supporter of Trump. |
| In a statement to the Guardian, Richardson said: “My reply to a private letter from Professor Rothstein should not be interpreted as implying that I have concerns about the actions taken by the Blavatnik school. I have every confidence in the leadership and governance of the school, but when an academic writes to me as Professor Rothstein did it is only right that I take steps to make sure I am aware of the facts of the case. A member of my office is in touch with the Blavatnik school in order to understand the sequence of events.” | In a statement to the Guardian, Richardson said: “My reply to a private letter from Professor Rothstein should not be interpreted as implying that I have concerns about the actions taken by the Blavatnik school. I have every confidence in the leadership and governance of the school, but when an academic writes to me as Professor Rothstein did it is only right that I take steps to make sure I am aware of the facts of the case. A member of my office is in touch with the Blavatnik school in order to understand the sequence of events.” |
| The Blavatnik school, which still lists Rothstein as a faculty member on its website, said it was saddened by his “false allegations”. | The Blavatnik school, which still lists Rothstein as a faculty member on its website, said it was saddened by his “false allegations”. |
| It said: “Professor Rothstein’s resignation made clear that he wished to disassociate himself from the Blavatnik school of government. So we were surprised to learn that Professor Rothstein wanted to remain in Oxford and in the pay of the school until December. When he proposed to the dean of the school that he base himself in Nuffield College, she agreed. | It said: “Professor Rothstein’s resignation made clear that he wished to disassociate himself from the Blavatnik school of government. So we were surprised to learn that Professor Rothstein wanted to remain in Oxford and in the pay of the school until December. When he proposed to the dean of the school that he base himself in Nuffield College, she agreed. |
| Professor Rothstein contacted colleagues to state that he would not teach this term nor deliver a paper to the seminar series he had previously convened. He is not supervising any current master of public policy students, nor did it make any sense to allocate new students to him when he would be leaving at Christmas. At no stage has Professor Rothstein been barred from the school nor prevented from contacting colleagues or students.” | Professor Rothstein contacted colleagues to state that he would not teach this term nor deliver a paper to the seminar series he had previously convened. He is not supervising any current master of public policy students, nor did it make any sense to allocate new students to him when he would be leaving at Christmas. At no stage has Professor Rothstein been barred from the school nor prevented from contacting colleagues or students.” |
| University of Oxford | |
| Sir Len Blavatnik | |
| Higher education | |
| Donald Trump | |
| news | |
| Share on Facebook | |
| Share on Twitter | |
| Share via Email | |
| Share on LinkedIn | |
| Share on Pinterest | |
| Share on Google+ | |
| Share on WhatsApp | |
| Share on Messenger | |
| Reuse this content |