This article is from the source 'guardian' and was first published or seen on . It last changed over 40 days ago and won't be checked again for changes.

You can find the current article at its original source at https://www.theguardian.com/uk-news/2017/nov/09/durham-police-force-asks-twitter-to-vote-if-it-should-use-spit-hoods

The article has changed 7 times. There is an RSS feed of changes available.

Version 3 Version 4
Twitter poll backs use of spit hoods by Durham police Twitter poll backs use of spit hoods by Durham police
(17 days later)
Human rights groups condemn ‘frivolous’ vote as Twitter users approve guard that prevents detainees spitting and biting
Josh Halliday North of England correspondent
Thu 9 Nov 2017 16.10 GMT
First published on Thu 9 Nov 2017 15.35 GMT
Share on Facebook
Share on Twitter
Share via Email
View more sharing options
Share on LinkedIn
Share on Pinterest
Share on Google+
Share on WhatsApp
Share on Messenger
Close
A police force has said it may start using spit hoods after its Twitter followers voted overwhelmingly in favour of them.A police force has said it may start using spit hoods after its Twitter followers voted overwhelmingly in favour of them.
Durham Constabulary carried out a poll on social media to gauge reaction to the controversial guards, the use of which has been condemned by human rights groups.Durham Constabulary carried out a poll on social media to gauge reaction to the controversial guards, the use of which has been condemned by human rights groups.
Out of more than 1,300 people who voted in the poll, 93% said they supported their use.Out of more than 1,300 people who voted in the poll, 93% said they supported their use.
We would like your views on ‘Spit Hoods’ and the potential for these to be used within force. A 'Spit Hood' is a restraint device intended to prevent an arrested individual from spitting or biting. Do you agree or disagree? Views can be sent to yourviews@durham.pnn.police.ukWe would like your views on ‘Spit Hoods’ and the potential for these to be used within force. A 'Spit Hood' is a restraint device intended to prevent an arrested individual from spitting or biting. Do you agree or disagree? Views can be sent to yourviews@durham.pnn.police.uk
Police say that spit hoods, which are stocking-like restraints pulled over the heads of arrestees to obstruct their mouths, are needed to protect officers from being bitten or spat on, possibly exposing them to pathogens such as hepatitis.Police say that spit hoods, which are stocking-like restraints pulled over the heads of arrestees to obstruct their mouths, are needed to protect officers from being bitten or spat on, possibly exposing them to pathogens such as hepatitis.
But human rights groups such as Amnesty International, Inquest and Liberty have criticised their use, saying they are dehumanising and dangerous because they could restrict breathing.But human rights groups such as Amnesty International, Inquest and Liberty have criticised their use, saying they are dehumanising and dangerous because they could restrict breathing.
Deborah Coles, director of human rights group Inquest, said the Twitter poll was a “rather frivolous way of dealing with a serious issue”.Deborah Coles, director of human rights group Inquest, said the Twitter poll was a “rather frivolous way of dealing with a serious issue”.
“If they’re serious about their research, then do a proper review involving detainees,” she said.“If they’re serious about their research, then do a proper review involving detainees,” she said.
Coles said she was against the use of spit hoods as they were “degrading and potentially harmful” and often used alongside other methods of force.Coles said she was against the use of spit hoods as they were “degrading and potentially harmful” and often used alongside other methods of force.
Spit hoods tended not to be used in isolation or in “calm” situations, she said. “Where you give the police new weapons they become the norm rather than the exception.”Spit hoods tended not to be used in isolation or in “calm” situations, she said. “Where you give the police new weapons they become the norm rather than the exception.”
Corey Stoughton, advocacy director at Liberty, said Twitter was not “an appropriate platform for a police force to consult on something as extreme, dangerous and divisive as spit hoods”.Corey Stoughton, advocacy director at Liberty, said Twitter was not “an appropriate platform for a police force to consult on something as extreme, dangerous and divisive as spit hoods”.
She added: “These tightly meshed bags have been linked to deaths in custody. We have seen disturbing cases of their use against children and people with mental health problems.She added: “These tightly meshed bags have been linked to deaths in custody. We have seen disturbing cases of their use against children and people with mental health problems.
“We need a real assessment of [spit hoods’] risks, analysis of the alternatives and robust national police guidance covering their use. This is an irresponsible move by Durham police.”“We need a real assessment of [spit hoods’] risks, analysis of the alternatives and robust national police guidance covering their use. This is an irresponsible move by Durham police.”
About a third of the 45 forces in England and Wales use spit hoods, as does Police Scotland. Britain’s biggest force, the Metropolitan police, is trialling their use.About a third of the 45 forces in England and Wales use spit hoods, as does Police Scotland. Britain’s biggest force, the Metropolitan police, is trialling their use.
Ken Marsh of the Metropolitan Police Federation told a conference in May that 16 officers needed hospital treatment at the Notting Hill carnival in 2016 because they were spat at.Ken Marsh of the Metropolitan Police Federation told a conference in May that 16 officers needed hospital treatment at the Notting Hill carnival in 2016 because they were spat at.
Responding to the Durham police poll, one person replied: “I fully support the use of spit hoods as officers need protecting from this disgusting assault.”Responding to the Durham police poll, one person replied: “I fully support the use of spit hoods as officers need protecting from this disgusting assault.”
Another said: “People who disagree with using these obviously haven’t been spat in the face by some dirty low-life crook! Spitting is despicable! Hope the force starts using them to protect our officers.”Another said: “People who disagree with using these obviously haven’t been spat in the face by some dirty low-life crook! Spitting is despicable! Hope the force starts using them to protect our officers.”
A Durham police spokeswoman said the poll had been suggested by an inspector, that it was “very much the beginning of a debate on their use” and that they wanted to gauge public opinion.A Durham police spokeswoman said the poll had been suggested by an inspector, that it was “very much the beginning of a debate on their use” and that they wanted to gauge public opinion.
The spokeswoman added: “As ever, at the heart of what we do is listening to what the people living in the counties we serve want from their police force.The spokeswoman added: “As ever, at the heart of what we do is listening to what the people living in the counties we serve want from their police force.
“We value views and feedback – both positive and negative.“We value views and feedback – both positive and negative.
“We have a huge social media following and so it seems fitting that we ask for public opinion. A poll provides measurable results which can help to shape decisions.”“We have a huge social media following and so it seems fitting that we ask for public opinion. A poll provides measurable results which can help to shape decisions.”
Police
Human rights
news
Share on Facebook
Share on Twitter
Share via Email
Share on LinkedIn
Share on Pinterest
Share on Google+
Share on WhatsApp
Share on Messenger
Reuse this content