This article is from the source 'guardian' and was first published or seen on . It last changed over 40 days ago and won't be checked again for changes.

You can find the current article at its original source at https://www.theguardian.com/uk-news/2017/nov/16/rolf-harris-has-one-indecent-assault-conviction-overturned

The article has changed 5 times. There is an RSS feed of changes available.

Version 0 Version 1
Rolf Harris has one indecent assault conviction overturned Rolf Harris has one indecent assault conviction overturned
(35 minutes later)
The disgraced entertainer Rolf Harris has had one of 12 indecent assault convictions overturned by the court of appeal.The disgraced entertainer Rolf Harris has had one of 12 indecent assault convictions overturned by the court of appeal.
Three judges ruled that the conviction was unsafe. But they rejected applications by Harris, 87, from Bray, Berkshire, to challenge 11 other indecent assault convictions.Three judges ruled that the conviction was unsafe. But they rejected applications by Harris, 87, from Bray, Berkshire, to challenge 11 other indecent assault convictions.
Lord Justice Treacy, Mrs Justice McGowan and the Recorder of Preston, Judge Mark Brown, announced their decision on Thursday in London.Lord Justice Treacy, Mrs Justice McGowan and the Recorder of Preston, Judge Mark Brown, announced their decision on Thursday in London.
The artist and musician was convicted of 12 indecent assaults at London’s Southwark crown court in June 2014. His victims included aneight-year-old who was seeking an autograph, two girls in their early teens, and a friend of his daughter who endured abuse over 16 years.The artist and musician was convicted of 12 indecent assaults at London’s Southwark crown court in June 2014. His victims included aneight-year-old who was seeking an autograph, two girls in their early teens, and a friend of his daughter who endured abuse over 16 years.
Harris was jailed for five years and nine months after being convicted of the assaults, which took place between 1968 and 1986. The Australian-born television presenter has since been released from that sentence.Harris was jailed for five years and nine months after being convicted of the assaults, which took place between 1968 and 1986. The Australian-born television presenter has since been released from that sentence.
He was not in court for Thuirsday’s ruling. He was not in court for Thursday’s ruling.
The prosecution did not seek a retrial on the single count and the judges agreed that a further trial would not be in the public interest.The prosecution did not seek a retrial on the single count and the judges agreed that a further trial would not be in the public interest.
The quashed conviction related to an allegation that Harris indecently assaulted an eight-year-old girl in 1969 when she attended an event at a leisure centre in Portsmouth.The quashed conviction related to an allegation that Harris indecently assaulted an eight-year-old girl in 1969 when she attended an event at a leisure centre in Portsmouth.
But the judges refused Harris permission to appeal against the rest of the 2014 convictions.But the judges refused Harris permission to appeal against the rest of the 2014 convictions.
They ruled that “stepping back and looking at the totality of the evidence” on those remaining counts “we find nothing that causes us to doubt the safety of those convictions”.They ruled that “stepping back and looking at the totality of the evidence” on those remaining counts “we find nothing that causes us to doubt the safety of those convictions”.
Stephen Vullo QC, for Harris, had presented four grounds of appeal at a recent hearing, which Harris attended.Stephen Vullo QC, for Harris, had presented four grounds of appeal at a recent hearing, which Harris attended.
One ground was that there was “fresh” evidence which supported Harris’s case, and complaint was also made about a direction given to the jury by the trial judge relating to the credibility of complainants.One ground was that there was “fresh” evidence which supported Harris’s case, and complaint was also made about a direction given to the jury by the trial judge relating to the credibility of complainants.
In May this year Harris was formally cleared of unconnected historical sex offences, which he had denied.In May this year Harris was formally cleared of unconnected historical sex offences, which he had denied.
He was formally cleared of four counts of indecent assault against girls as young as 13 after a retrial ended with a hung jury.He was formally cleared of four counts of indecent assault against girls as young as 13 after a retrial ended with a hung jury.