This article is from the source 'guardian' and was first published or seen on . It last changed over 40 days ago and won't be checked again for changes.

You can find the current article at its original source at https://www.theguardian.com/business/2017/nov/21/university-london-support-staff-pay-conditions-agency-staff

The article has changed 5 times. There is an RSS feed of changes available.

Version 0 Version 1
University support staff launch landmark case over pay and conditions Landmark case over pay and conditions for university support staff
(about 5 hours later)
About 75 university support staff are launching a legal challenge over pay and conditions in a landmark case that could improve rights for agency workers. A union is launching a legal challenge over the rights of 75 university support staff to negotiate their pay and conditions in a landmark case that could improve rights for outsourced workers.
The receptionists, security officers, postroom staff and porters working at the University of London are employed through facilities management company Cordant Security, but are seeking the right to agree their pay and conditions with the university. The receptionists, security officers, postroom staff and porters working at the University of London are employed through facilities management company Cordant Security, but are seeking the right to agree their pay and conditions directly with the university.
Papers for the case, which is backed by gig economy union the Independent Workers Union of Great Britain, and barrister Jolyon Maugham QC’s Good Law Project, are being filed at the central arbitration committee on Tuesday. Papers for the case, led by gig economy union the Independent Workers Union of Great Britain, and barrister Jolyon Maugham QC’s Good Law Project, are being filed at the central arbitration committee on Tuesday.
It argues that denying the workers the right to collectively bargain with their “de facto employer” is a breach of article 11 of the European convention on human rights, to join a trade union and have it protect their interests.It argues that denying the workers the right to collectively bargain with their “de facto employer” is a breach of article 11 of the European convention on human rights, to join a trade union and have it protect their interests.
If successful, the case could potentially open the door for thousands of agency workers across the UK, such as those working in the Sports Direct warehouse, to negotiate with the company that ultimately benefits from their labour. If successful, the case could potentially open the door for thousands of outsourced workers across the UK to negotiate with the company that ultimately benefits from their labour. The union said that if it established the precedent of a joint employer for the purposes of collective bargaining, this could potentially be applied to people employed via agencies, such as those working in the Sports Direct warehouse.
The IWGB general secretary, Dr Jason Moyer Lee, said: “When it comes to the most important elements of pay and terms and conditions for the outsourced workers, it is the University of London and not Cordant which calls the shots.The IWGB general secretary, Dr Jason Moyer Lee, said: “When it comes to the most important elements of pay and terms and conditions for the outsourced workers, it is the University of London and not Cordant which calls the shots.
“In order for these workers’ collective bargaining and human rights to mean anything, we need to be able to negotiate directly with the university, not the glorified middleman.”“In order for these workers’ collective bargaining and human rights to mean anything, we need to be able to negotiate directly with the university, not the glorified middleman.”
The court case is the latest in a series of battles over better employment rights and pay between agency workers, particularly cleaning staff, and universities and other major institutions including hospitals. The court case is the latest in a series of battles over better employment rights and pay between outsourced workers, particularly cleaning staff, and universities and other major institutions including hospitals.
Britain’s growing army of agency staff earn hundreds of pounds a year less than employees doing the same jobs, according to a report into the issue published last year by the Resolution Foundation thinktank. The TUC general secretary, Frances O’Grady, said the practice of using outsourced workers hit those in the lowest-paid sectors the hardest.
The TUC general secretary, Frances O’Grady, said the practice of using agency workers hit those in the lowest-paid sectors the hardest. “Outsourcing’s a cheap trick used by bad bosses to dodge their basic responsibilities to workers. They’re trying to hammer down people’s pay and get an unfair advantage,” she said.
“Outsourcing a cheap trick used by bad bosses to dodge their basic responsibilities to workers. They’re trying to hammer down people’s pay and get an unfair advantage,” she said.
“Other European countries have a sensible way of dealing with this. Unions and businesses negotiate fair pay rates for the whole sector, which means outsourcing can’t drive down pay and conditions.”“Other European countries have a sensible way of dealing with this. Unions and businesses negotiate fair pay rates for the whole sector, which means outsourcing can’t drive down pay and conditions.”
• Follow Guardian Business on Twitter at @BusinessDesk, or sign up to the daily Business Today email here. • This article was amended on Tuesday 21 November. An earlier version of this article incorrectly referred to agency workers, rather than outsourced workers. We were also incorrect when we said the case was being launched by the staff; it is being brought by the union.