This article is from the source 'independent' and was first published or seen on . It last changed over 40 days ago and won't be checked again for changes.
You can find the current article at its original source at http://www.independent.co.uk/news/uk/politics/animal-sentience-michael-gove-vote-mps-rspsca-a8071476.html
The article has changed 2 times. There is an RSS feed of changes available.
Previous version
1
Next version
Version 0 | Version 1 |
---|---|
Michael Gove promises Government will recognise 'animal sentience' in British law after Brexit | Michael Gove promises Government will recognise 'animal sentience' in British law after Brexit |
(about 3 hours later) | |
Michael Gove has promised the UK will continue to recognise the sentience of animals after Brexit and committed the Government to strengthening protections. | Michael Gove has promised the UK will continue to recognise the sentience of animals after Brexit and committed the Government to strengthening protections. |
The Environment Secretary denied a vote that took place in the Commons last week represented a weakening in protections for animals, pointing to new laws already being introduced. | |
Mr Gove issued a statement after an outcry from animal rights groups and campaigners following the vote, which saw MPs reject bringing an EU regulation guaranteeing animal sentience into British law after Brexit. | Mr Gove issued a statement after an outcry from animal rights groups and campaigners following the vote, which saw MPs reject bringing an EU regulation guaranteeing animal sentience into British law after Brexit. |
The minister said in a written statement on Thursday that changes the Government will make to UK law after EU withdrawal will include recognition of animal sentience. | The minister said in a written statement on Thursday that changes the Government will make to UK law after EU withdrawal will include recognition of animal sentience. |
He said: “This Government will ensure that any necessary changes required to UK law are made in a rigorous and comprehensive way to ensure animal sentience is recognised after we leave the EU. | He said: “This Government will ensure that any necessary changes required to UK law are made in a rigorous and comprehensive way to ensure animal sentience is recognised after we leave the EU. |
“The [EU withdrawal Bill, voted on last week] is not the right place to address this, however we are considering the right legislative vehicle.” | “The [EU withdrawal Bill, voted on last week] is not the right place to address this, however we are considering the right legislative vehicle.” |
The minister argued that the EU regulation in question, Article 13 of the Lisbon Treaty, was flawed and that the Government could better protect animals without it, in British-based legislation. | The minister argued that the EU regulation in question, Article 13 of the Lisbon Treaty, was flawed and that the Government could better protect animals without it, in British-based legislation. |
He added: “It has been suggested that the vote last week on [the EU Withdrawal Bill] somehow signalled a weakening in the protection of animals – that is wrong. | He added: “It has been suggested that the vote last week on [the EU Withdrawal Bill] somehow signalled a weakening in the protection of animals – that is wrong. |
“Voting against the amendment was not a vote against the idea that animals are sentient and feel pain.” | “Voting against the amendment was not a vote against the idea that animals are sentient and feel pain.” |
The minister also said the Government was proposing new primary legislation to increase maximum sentences for animal cruelty from six months to five years, creating a new independent body to uphold standards, and recently made CCTV mandatory in all slaughterhouses. | |
During the debate ahead of the vote last week, Green MP Caroline Lucas pointed out that it had been the British Government that pushed the EU to include a guarantee of animal sentience in its regulation. | During the debate ahead of the vote last week, Green MP Caroline Lucas pointed out that it had been the British Government that pushed the EU to include a guarantee of animal sentience in its regulation. |
Government ministers argued that animals did already enjoy a protected status under the Animal Welfare Act 2006, and so animal rights would not be substantially weakened by a failure to bring Article 13 into British law. | Government ministers argued that animals did already enjoy a protected status under the Animal Welfare Act 2006, and so animal rights would not be substantially weakened by a failure to bring Article 13 into British law. |
But critics, including the RSPCA, pointed out that the 2006 legislation does not explicitly recognise the term “animal sentience”, although it does acknowledge that animals can experience suffering and pain. | But critics, including the RSPCA, pointed out that the 2006 legislation does not explicitly recognise the term “animal sentience”, although it does acknowledge that animals can experience suffering and pain. |
RSPCA head of public affairs David Bowles said: “In the EU, we know that the recognition of animals as sentient beings has been effective in improving animal welfare across the region. | RSPCA head of public affairs David Bowles said: “In the EU, we know that the recognition of animals as sentient beings has been effective in improving animal welfare across the region. |
“If the UK is to achieve the Environment Secretary’s objective of achieving the highest possible animal welfare post-Brexit, it must do the same.” | “If the UK is to achieve the Environment Secretary’s objective of achieving the highest possible animal welfare post-Brexit, it must do the same.” |
Concerns over whether animal rights will be as strong after Brexit mirror those over whether workers’ rights and environmental protections will also be weakened. | Concerns over whether animal rights will be as strong after Brexit mirror those over whether workers’ rights and environmental protections will also be weakened. |
Ministers have also promised to strengthen these in separate legislation in the future. | Ministers have also promised to strengthen these in separate legislation in the future. |
Previous version
1
Next version