This article is from the source 'guardian' and was first published or seen on . It last changed over 40 days ago and won't be checked again for changes.
You can find the current article at its original source at https://www.theguardian.com/media/2017/nov/26/economics-editors-should-enlighten-us-on-budget
The article has changed 4 times. There is an RSS feed of changes available.
Version 1 | Version 2 |
---|---|
Economics editors, it’s your job to tell us what’s really behind the budget | Economics editors, it’s your job to tell us what’s really behind the budget |
(30 days later) | |
Sun 26 Nov 2017 07.00 GMT | Sun 26 Nov 2017 07.00 GMT |
Last modified on Wed 14 Feb 2018 16.27 GMT | |
Share on Facebook | Share on Facebook |
Share on Twitter | Share on Twitter |
Share via Email | Share via Email |
View more sharing options | View more sharing options |
Share on LinkedIn | Share on LinkedIn |
Share on Pinterest | Share on Pinterest |
Share on Google+ | Share on Google+ |
Share on WhatsApp | Share on WhatsApp |
Share on Messenger | Share on Messenger |
Close | Close |
What are political correspondents – from Laura, Nick and Robert on down – there for? Not to go to the same old briefings and sing the same old song? Independent judgment is a coverage pearl beyond price? | What are political correspondents – from Laura, Nick and Robert on down – there for? Not to go to the same old briefings and sing the same old song? Independent judgment is a coverage pearl beyond price? |
And what are economics correspondents there for on the big budget outing? Not merely to take the latest Office of Budget Responsibility growth figures and turn them into a uniform tale of woe. As Alex Brummer of the Mail (and before that the Guardian) very reasonably pointed out, the OBR has “a flawed track record” on forecasting– and is glooming a damned sight harder than the Bank of England and IMF. | And what are economics correspondents there for on the big budget outing? Not merely to take the latest Office of Budget Responsibility growth figures and turn them into a uniform tale of woe. As Alex Brummer of the Mail (and before that the Guardian) very reasonably pointed out, the OBR has “a flawed track record” on forecasting– and is glooming a damned sight harder than the Bank of England and IMF. |
That may be right or it may be wrong. But the point of employing economics editors is to give the audience their own special take on Philip Hammond’s figuring, not to simply transfer pages of OBR (or indeed, extra-gloomy Institute of Fiscal Studies prognostication) into holy writ. Two questions matter most. Are we really in a hole this big? And even if we are, what can we do about it? | That may be right or it may be wrong. But the point of employing economics editors is to give the audience their own special take on Philip Hammond’s figuring, not to simply transfer pages of OBR (or indeed, extra-gloomy Institute of Fiscal Studies prognostication) into holy writ. Two questions matter most. Are we really in a hole this big? And even if we are, what can we do about it? |
TV news | TV news |
Peter Preston on press and broadcasting | Peter Preston on press and broadcasting |
Budget 2017 (November) | Budget 2017 (November) |
Philip Hammond | Philip Hammond |
Office for Budget Responsibility | Office for Budget Responsibility |
Economic policy | Economic policy |
Economics | Economics |
comment | comment |
Share on Facebook | Share on Facebook |
Share on Twitter | Share on Twitter |
Share via Email | Share via Email |
Share on LinkedIn | Share on LinkedIn |
Share on Pinterest | Share on Pinterest |
Share on Google+ | Share on Google+ |
Share on WhatsApp | Share on WhatsApp |
Share on Messenger | Share on Messenger |
Reuse this content | Reuse this content |