This article is from the source 'guardian' and was first published or seen on . It last changed over 40 days ago and won't be checked again for changes.

You can find the current article at its original source at https://www.theguardian.com/media/2017/nov/26/economics-editors-should-enlighten-us-on-budget

The article has changed 4 times. There is an RSS feed of changes available.

Version 1 Version 2
Economics editors, it’s your job to tell us what’s really behind the budget Economics editors, it’s your job to tell us what’s really behind the budget
(30 days later)
Sun 26 Nov 2017 07.00 GMTSun 26 Nov 2017 07.00 GMT
Last modified on Sat 2 Dec 2017 02.27 GMT Last modified on Wed 14 Feb 2018 16.27 GMT
Share on FacebookShare on Facebook
Share on TwitterShare on Twitter
Share via EmailShare via Email
View more sharing optionsView more sharing options
Share on LinkedInShare on LinkedIn
Share on PinterestShare on Pinterest
Share on Google+Share on Google+
Share on WhatsAppShare on WhatsApp
Share on MessengerShare on Messenger
CloseClose
What are political correspondents – from Laura, Nick and Robert on down – there for? Not to go to the same old briefings and sing the same old song? Independent judgment is a coverage pearl beyond price?What are political correspondents – from Laura, Nick and Robert on down – there for? Not to go to the same old briefings and sing the same old song? Independent judgment is a coverage pearl beyond price?
And what are economics correspondents there for on the big budget outing? Not merely to take the latest Office of Budget Responsibility growth figures and turn them into a uniform tale of woe. As Alex Brummer of the Mail (and before that the Guardian) very reasonably pointed out, the OBR has “a flawed track record” on forecasting– and is glooming a damned sight harder than the Bank of England and IMF.And what are economics correspondents there for on the big budget outing? Not merely to take the latest Office of Budget Responsibility growth figures and turn them into a uniform tale of woe. As Alex Brummer of the Mail (and before that the Guardian) very reasonably pointed out, the OBR has “a flawed track record” on forecasting– and is glooming a damned sight harder than the Bank of England and IMF.
That may be right or it may be wrong. But the point of employing economics editors is to give the audience their own special take on Philip Hammond’s figuring, not to simply transfer pages of OBR (or indeed, extra-gloomy Institute of Fiscal Studies prognostication) into holy writ. Two questions matter most. Are we really in a hole this big? And even if we are, what can we do about it?That may be right or it may be wrong. But the point of employing economics editors is to give the audience their own special take on Philip Hammond’s figuring, not to simply transfer pages of OBR (or indeed, extra-gloomy Institute of Fiscal Studies prognostication) into holy writ. Two questions matter most. Are we really in a hole this big? And even if we are, what can we do about it?
TV newsTV news
Peter Preston on press and broadcastingPeter Preston on press and broadcasting
Budget 2017 (November)Budget 2017 (November)
Philip HammondPhilip Hammond
Office for Budget ResponsibilityOffice for Budget Responsibility
Economic policyEconomic policy
EconomicsEconomics
commentcomment
Share on FacebookShare on Facebook
Share on TwitterShare on Twitter
Share via EmailShare via Email
Share on LinkedInShare on LinkedIn
Share on PinterestShare on Pinterest
Share on Google+Share on Google+
Share on WhatsAppShare on WhatsApp
Share on MessengerShare on Messenger
Reuse this contentReuse this content