This article is from the source 'guardian' and was first published or seen on . It last changed over 40 days ago and won't be checked again for changes.
You can find the current article at its original source at https://www.theguardian.com/society/2017/nov/26/how-to-avoid-blame-for-the-underfunding-of-the-nhs
The article has changed 3 times. There is an RSS feed of changes available.
| Version 0 | Version 1 |
|---|---|
| How to avoid blame for the underfunding of the NHS | How to avoid blame for the underfunding of the NHS |
| (about 2 months later) | |
| Letters | |
| Sun 26 Nov 2017 19.00 GMT | |
| Last modified on Sun 26 Nov 2017 22.00 GMT | |
| Share on Facebook | |
| Share on Twitter | |
| Share via Email | |
| View more sharing options | |
| Share on LinkedIn | |
| Share on Pinterest | |
| Share on Google+ | |
| Share on WhatsApp | |
| Share on Messenger | |
| Close | |
| The continuing row about health spending (Intervention by health chief meant NHS got less, 25 November) reflects the current structure of NHS governance, which is not fit for purpose. In the old days the relevant cabinet minister was unambiguously responsible for ensuring that the NHS had sufficient funding to provide an adequate health service. But, in accordance with recent fashion, NHS England was hived off as a kind of executive agency, with its chief executive undertaking a form of contract under which he was responsible for providing an adequate service. He could make representations to the Department of Health on the minimum necessary funding, but the minister would then negotiate with the Treasury and have the final say in the settlement. | The continuing row about health spending (Intervention by health chief meant NHS got less, 25 November) reflects the current structure of NHS governance, which is not fit for purpose. In the old days the relevant cabinet minister was unambiguously responsible for ensuring that the NHS had sufficient funding to provide an adequate health service. But, in accordance with recent fashion, NHS England was hived off as a kind of executive agency, with its chief executive undertaking a form of contract under which he was responsible for providing an adequate service. He could make representations to the Department of Health on the minimum necessary funding, but the minister would then negotiate with the Treasury and have the final say in the settlement. |
| If the amount on offer was inadequate in his view, then given his formal role Simon Stevens could not continue in office without making clear in public that it would not be enough to maintain an adequate service. This structure, which is now widespread in the public sector, is convenient for ministers who want to avoid responsibility for day-to-day operations in public services. But the divided responsibility promotes “small government” dogma and unaccountable power.Alan Bailey (Second permanent secretary HM Treasury 1982-85), London | If the amount on offer was inadequate in his view, then given his formal role Simon Stevens could not continue in office without making clear in public that it would not be enough to maintain an adequate service. This structure, which is now widespread in the public sector, is convenient for ministers who want to avoid responsibility for day-to-day operations in public services. But the divided responsibility promotes “small government” dogma and unaccountable power.Alan Bailey (Second permanent secretary HM Treasury 1982-85), London |
| • The government is so weak that rather than give the NHS the money it needs to function properly it cuts it back due to the intervention of the head of NHS England. Conversely of course this could be an attempt to blame Simon Stevens for the fact that the budget didn’t award the NHS anything near what it requires. Either incompetent or cynical or both. This about sums up this government’s approach. It is so busy covering its own back that the needs of its suffering citizens are ignored.Jennifer Budden Plymouth | • The government is so weak that rather than give the NHS the money it needs to function properly it cuts it back due to the intervention of the head of NHS England. Conversely of course this could be an attempt to blame Simon Stevens for the fact that the budget didn’t award the NHS anything near what it requires. Either incompetent or cynical or both. This about sums up this government’s approach. It is so busy covering its own back that the needs of its suffering citizens are ignored.Jennifer Budden Plymouth |
| • So the chancellor has condemned patients to more delay, inconvenience and possible harm because he was having a hissy fit about Simon Stevens?Pam LunnKenilworth, Warwickshire | • So the chancellor has condemned patients to more delay, inconvenience and possible harm because he was having a hissy fit about Simon Stevens?Pam LunnKenilworth, Warwickshire |
| • Join the debate – email guardian.letters@theguardian.com | • Join the debate – email guardian.letters@theguardian.com |
| • Read more Guardian letters – click here to visit gu.com/letters | • Read more Guardian letters – click here to visit gu.com/letters |
| NHS | |
| Health | |
| Philip Hammond | |
| Simon Stevens | |
| letters | |
| Share on Facebook | |
| Share on Twitter | |
| Share via Email | |
| Share on LinkedIn | |
| Share on Pinterest | |
| Share on Google+ | |
| Share on WhatsApp | |
| Share on Messenger | |
| Reuse this content |