This article is from the source 'guardian' and was first published or seen on . It last changed over 40 days ago and won't be checked again for changes.

You can find the current article at its original source at https://www.theguardian.com/society/2017/nov/30/nhs-bosses-waiting-time-targets-abandoned-next-year

The article has changed 7 times. There is an RSS feed of changes available.

Version 1 Version 2
NHS bosses say waiting time targets will have to be abandoned next year Jeremy Hunt orders NHS England bosses to stick to waiting time limits
(about 4 hours later)
NHS bosses have warned ministers they will have to tear up guarantees on waiting times and deny patients new drugs next year because they have been given too little money. Jeremy Hunt has ordered NHS England to stick to waiting time limits, putting him at loggerheads with its leaders who said hours earlier that insufficient funding from last week’s budget made this impossible.
The government’s refusal to give the NHS the extra funds it said it needed in last week’s budget mean that key waiting time targets – on A&E treatment, cancer care, non-urgent hospital operations and ambulance arrival times – can no longer be met from April, NHS England made clear. NHS England told ministers on Thursday it would have to tear up guarantees on waiting times and deny patients new drugs next year because of the lack of money.
In an escalation of its public dispute with ministers over what the NHS can afford to do, it also said it would ignore recommendations to improve patient care made by the National Institute for health and Care Excellence (Nice), because it does not have the money or staff to implement them. In an escalation of its public dispute with ministers over what the NHS can afford to do, it also said it would ignore recommendations to improve patient care made by the National Institute for Health and Care Excellence (Nice).
The twin threats could force the health secretary, Jeremy Hunt, to explain to the House of Commons why the NHS is reducing the amount of care it offers and lead to months of rows between NHS leaders and ministers as they discuss what services the health service can no longer afford. The twin threats, made at an unprecedented public board meeting, put Hunt in danger of having to explain to the House of Commons why the NHS is reducing the amount of care it offers. They could also lead to months of rows between NHS leaders and ministers as they discuss what services the health service can no longer afford.
Patient groups reacted with horror to the “extraordinary” situation, which emerged at NHS England’s monthly board meeting, the first it has held since the chancellor, Philip Hammond, gave it £1.6bn extra funding in the budget – less than half the £4bn it had demanded. But hours later Hunt rejected the plans and made clear that ministers expected hospitals to keep meeting the waiting time targets. The health secretary told an audience of NHS chiefs at the King’s Fund: “I would say very simply that the government is absolutely committed to NHS constitutional standards, that is why we found a significant increase for the NHS in the budget.
“It made clear how patients will lose out as a result of political decisions about the funding of health and social care. There will be longer waits for elective surgery, and therefore more pain and worse outcomes for many,” said Rachel Power, chief executive of the Patients Association. She praised NHS England for having “faced up to the consequences of the underfunding of the NHS by the government”. “Our absolute determination is to move back to hitting those standards, which we’re not hitting all of at the moment – we recognise that.”
“NHS England has also said it is unable to implement best practice as advised by Nice on a routine basis – an extraordinary state of affairs. He added: “Part of that is a funding issue. Part of that also is a capacity issue. I think we will have constructive, sensible discussions with NHS England to find a way forward to meet our objective, which is to get back to meeting those standards.”
“We have now reached a point where the NHS constitution will be routinely breached, and NHS services are being withdrawn.” Patient groups reacted with horror to the situation, which emerged at NHS England’s first monthly board meeting since the chancellor, Philip Hammond, gave it £1.6bn extra funding in the budget – less than half the £4bn it had demanded.
On Thursday NHS England repeatedly told ministers that there needed to be “realism” about how much the NHS could do from now on and that “some difficult judgments about priorities” would have to be made. They will be hammered out in potentially tense discussions over the next few months about what the government’s annual mandate to the NHS – setting out what ministers regard as the NHS’s key tasks in 2018-19 – should involve. The chief executive of the Patients Association, Rachel Power, said: “It made clear how patients will lose out as a result of political decisions about the funding of health and social care. There will be longer waits for elective surgery, and therefore more pain and worse outcomes for many.”
It disclosed its thinking in a briefing paper to its board called “to set out the results and implications of the 2018-19 budget, and next steps”. She praised NHS England for having “faced up to the consequences of the underfunding of the NHS by the government”.
“NHS England has also said it is unable to implement best practice as advised by Nice on a routine basis – an extraordinary state of affairs. We have now reached a point where the NHS constitution will be routinely breached and NHS services are being withdrawn,” Power said.
On Thursday NHS England repeatedly told ministers there needed to be “realism” about how much the NHS could do from now on and that “some difficult judgments about priorities” would have to be made. Decisions will be hammered out in potentially tense discussions over the next few months about what the government’s annual mandate to the NHS – setting out what ministers regard as the NHS’s key tasks in 2018-19 – should involve.
NHS England disclosed its thinking in a briefing paper to its board billed as setting out “the results and implications of the 2018-19 budget, and next steps”.
In a section about the need to “be realistic about what can be expected from the remaining available funds”, it said: “It would be unfair to set unattainable goals which staff would then be criticised for not meeting. In part this therefore means more scrutiny of unfunded new expectations that are loaded on to the NHS.In a section about the need to “be realistic about what can be expected from the remaining available funds”, it said: “It would be unfair to set unattainable goals which staff would then be criticised for not meeting. In part this therefore means more scrutiny of unfunded new expectations that are loaded on to the NHS.
“For example, new advisory Nice guidelines can only expect to be implemented locally across the NHS if in future they are accompanied by a clear and agreed affordability and workforce assessment at the time they are drawn up,” it added. “For example, new advisory Nice guidelines can only expect to be implemented locally across the NHS if in future they are accompanied by a clear and agreed affordability and workforce assessment at the time they are drawn up.”
Guidelines issued by Nice, which decides what treatments represent value for money for the NHS, are meant to be binding on the 209 NHS clinical commissioning groups (CCGs) which hold NHS budgets locally. However, many CCGs ignore some of them, for example on providing IVF treatment. Guidelines issued by Nice, which decides what treatments represent value for money for the NHS, are meant to be binding on the 209 NHS clinical commissioning groups (CCGs) that hold NHS budgets locally. However, many CCGs ignore some of them, for example on providing IVF treatment.
On waiting time targets, which have existed in the NHS for more than a decade, the briefing added: “Even without increased volume [demand for care], and even assuming this year’s unprecedented elective demand management success continues, our current forecast is that – without offsetting reductions in other areas of care – NHS constitution waiting times standards, in the round, will not be fully funded and met next year.”On waiting time targets, which have existed in the NHS for more than a decade, the briefing added: “Even without increased volume [demand for care], and even assuming this year’s unprecedented elective demand management success continues, our current forecast is that – without offsetting reductions in other areas of care – NHS constitution waiting times standards, in the round, will not be fully funded and met next year.”
Labour immediately raised doubts over whether it would be legal for the NHS not to enforce key waiting time targets, given that they are enshrined in the NHS constitution. Philip Hunt, its health spokesman in the House of Lords and an ex-hospital trust boss, said it would be illegal. Labour immediately raised doubts about whether it would be legal for the NHS not to enforce key waiting time targets, given that they are enshrined in the NHS constitution. Philip Hunt, its health spokesman in the House of Lords and an ex-hospital trust boss, said it would be illegal.
Jonathan Ashworth, the shadow health secretary, added: “There are serious questions about the legality of effectively abandoning a standard of care enshrined in the NHS constitution. As a matter of urgency Jeremy Hunt must now tell us whether he intends to amend the law and the NHS constitution through legislation and publicly accept his government’s funding squeeze is jeopardising legally guaranteed standards of patient care.” Jonathan Ashworth, the shadow health secretary, said: “There are serious questions about the legality of effectively abandoning a standard of care enshrined in the NHS constitution. As a matter of urgency Jeremy Hunt must now tell us whether he intends to amend the law and the NHS constitution through legislation and publicly accept his government’s funding squeeze is jeopardising legally guaranteed standards of patient care.”
However, Simon Stevens, the NHS England chief executive, backtracked on the possible scrapping of plans to improve cancer and mental health care as part of its cost-cutting drive, which he had first floated earlier this month. Both areas, and also primary care – especially GP services – will not be key priorities in 2018-19, he said. The NHS England chief executive, Simon Stevens, backtracked on the possible scrapping of plans to improve cancer and mental health care as part of its cost-cutting drive, which he had first floated earlier this month. Both areas, and also primary care – especially GP services – would not be key priorities in 2018-19, he said.
But NHS England in effect accused Hammond of breaking a key pledge in this year’s Conservative general election manifesto, which promised to increase health spending per head of population every year until 2022. While the extra money in the budget meant that per capita funding would rise by 0.9% next year, it would fall by 0.4% in 2019-20, it claimed.But NHS England in effect accused Hammond of breaking a key pledge in this year’s Conservative general election manifesto, which promised to increase health spending per head of population every year until 2022. While the extra money in the budget meant that per capita funding would rise by 0.9% next year, it would fall by 0.4% in 2019-20, it claimed.
Chris Hopson, chief executive of NHS Providers, which represents hospital trusts, praised the “realism” of NHS England’s “excellent, sensible, helpful board paper on what happens next post-budget”, given the NHS’s finances. Chris Hopson, chief executive of NHS Providers, which represents hospital trusts, praised the “realism” of NHS England’s “excellent, sensible, helpful board paper on what happens next post-budget”.
But the Royal College of Surgeons warned that forcing patients to wait to undergo surgery would cost the NHS more in the end. The Royal College of Surgeons said forcing patients to wait to undergo surgery would cost the NHS more in the end. “It is disappointing that the progress the whole NHS has made over the last decade on planned waiting times, such as for heart and brain surgery, now risks being lost,” said Prof Derek Alderson, its president.
“It is disappointing that the progress the whole NHS has made over the last decade on planned waiting times, such as for heart and brain surgery, now risks being lost,” said Prof Derek Alderson, its president.
“Rationing and delaying surgical treatment are false economies. For example, current CCG policies designed to delay surgical access for obese patients and smokers only defers treatment and potentially adds costs through increased use of painkillers, physiotherapy, and welfare support for out-of-work patients.”“Rationing and delaying surgical treatment are false economies. For example, current CCG policies designed to delay surgical access for obese patients and smokers only defers treatment and potentially adds costs through increased use of painkillers, physiotherapy, and welfare support for out-of-work patients.”
On Thursday NHS England also ratified plans to stop prescribing a range of “low-value treatments”, including fish oil, herbal remedies and homeopathic treatments, as part of a plan to save up to £190m from its £9.2bn bill for prescribed medications. NHS England also ratified plans to stop prescribing a range of “low-value treatments”, including fish oil, herbal remedies and homeopathic treatments, as part of a plan to save up to £190m from its £9.2bn bill for prescribed medications.
Meanwhile, the board also lifted the threat of closure that had been hanging over two hospital units that operate on children’s hearts. Meanwhile, the board lifted the threat of closure that had been hanging over two hospital units that operate on children’s hearts.
Glenfield hospital in Leicester has been given more time to meet clinical standards on performing complex congenital heart surgery. And NHS England is backing ambitious plans by the Royal Brompton hospital in London to relocate its unit which provides that care as part of a wholesale move from its current premises to a planned £800m new-build facility at St Thomas’s hospital in central London which it will share with specialists from other hospitals. Glenfield hospital in Leicester has been given more time to meet clinical standards on performing complex congenital heart surgery. And NHS England is backing ambitious plans by the Royal Brompton hospital in London to relocate its unit which provides that care, as part of a wholesale move from its current premises to a planned £800m new-build facility at St Thomas’s hospital in central London, which it will share with specialists from other hospitals.