This article is from the source 'rtcom' and was first published or seen on . It last changed over 40 days ago and won't be checked again for changes.

You can find the current article at its original source at https://www.rt.com/usa/411768-us-withdraws-global-migration-deal/

The article has changed 2 times. There is an RSS feed of changes available.

Version 0 Version 1
US quits UN global compact for migration as ‘inconsistent’ with sovereignty US pulls out of UN pledge to protect migrants as Europe struggles with refugee tide
(about 13 hours later)
The US ambassador to the UN, Nikki Haley, has announced Washington’s withdrawal from the process to create a global compact aimed at facilitating international migration, as it goes against the American idea of sovereignty. Washington has repudiated a UN pledge to protect the rights of migrants regardless of their legal status. The agreement is incompatible with the country’s sovereignty and the Trump administration’s views on immigration, US envoy Nikki Haley said.
In a statement Saturday, Haley said that then-President Obama’s decision to commit the US to the process by signing the non-binding New York Declaration for Refugees and Migrants in September 2016 had come at the expense of America’s interest. In a statement released on Saturday, Ambassador Haley said President Donald Trump “determined that the US would end its participation in the process” known as the New York Declaration for Refugees and Migrants. Despite former president Barack Obama having signed the declaration, Washington’s involvement is an affront to the American idea of sovereignty, she said.
“The New York Declaration contains numerous provisions that are inconsistent with US immigration and refugee polices and the Trump Administration’s immigration principles,” she said in a written statement tweeted by the US mission to the UN. “The New York Declaration contains numerous provisions that are inconsistent with US immigration and refugee polices and the Trump Administration’s immigration principles,” the statement claimed, adding that the document’s “global approach... is simply not compatible with the US’ sovereignty.”
“The global approach in the New York Declaration is simply not compatible with the US sovereignty,” the statement concluded. In September 2016, 193 member states of the United Nations adopted the declaration, which pledges to protect the rights and freedoms of migrants “regardless of their migratory status.” The non-binding agreement also called on signatory states to facilitate migrant integration into society and combat discrimination in all its forms. The New York Declaration was meant to pave the way for the adoption of a global compact for migration in 2018.
According to the International Organization for Migration (IOM), the UN migration agency, the signatories of the document, that was to pave the way for the adoption of the global compact for migration in 2018, have pledged to protect the rights and freedoms of migrants, “regardless of their migratory status,” facilitate their integration, fight racial and other forms of discrimination. In her statement announcing Washington’s withdrawal from the landmark initiative, Haley said that domestic policy matters such as treatment of migrants “must always be made by Americans and Americans alone.” Claiming that “no country has done more than the US” for the displaced globally, she stated: “We will decide how best to control our borders and who will be allowed to enter our country.”
Outlining the main objectives of the future compact, the IOM cited the 2030 Agenda for Sustainable Development, adopted by the UN General Assembly in 2015, that calls on countries to work together to “facilitate safe, orderly and regular migration.” In September, the Deferred Action for Childhood Arrivals (DACA) was scrapped by Trump, giving Congress six months to pass a law regulating the status of some 700,000 immigrants who came to the US illegally as minors. The Trump administration is also moving forward with plans to expand the US-Mexico border wall. In October, a House panel approved legislation to provide a total of $15 billion for the construction of the wall along the border.
While announcing the US decision to pull out from the landmark initiative, Haley still praised what she framed as Washington’s “long-standing moral leadership” in providing support to migrants all over the world, promising that its “generosity will continue.”
She explained the motives behind the move, saying that such domestic policy matters as migration decisions “must always be made by Americans and Americans alone.”
“We will decide how best to control our borders and who will be allowed to enter the country,” she stressed.
Thus, the global compact for migration becomes yet another piece of Obama’s global legacy dismantled by the Trump administration along with the Paris Climate Accord and, possibly, the Iranian nuclear deal, which is still intact but hanging in the balance.
As far as US internal matters, the US president has taken a much more hardline stance on illegal immigration, scrapping the Deferred Action for Childhood Arrivals (DACA) in September and giving Congress six months to pass a law regulating the status of some 700,000 immigrants who came into the US illegally as minors.
READ MORE: Ending DACA: Trump gives Congress 6-month deadline on immigrant youths programREAD MORE: Ending DACA: Trump gives Congress 6-month deadline on immigrant youths program
Also known as “Dreamers,” they were granted a temporary protection from deportation by Obama’s executive action in 2012. With Congress struggling to reach a deal, hundreds of Dreamers took over the Senate building last month, demanding it pass a law granting them legal status. The failure to find a compromise over DACA before December 8 could lead to a government shutdown, as Democrats are demanding that any budget deal should include language providing protection for DACA recipients. Having boasted of America’s “long-standing moral leadership” in providing aid to migrants all over the world, in her statement Haley vowed that Washington’s “generosity will continue,” although she didn’t specify how the US was alleviating Europe’s migrant crisis.
Trump’s immigration policy agenda also includes bringing an end to the Green Card lottery, replacing it with a merit-based system and cracking down on “sanctuary cities.” The Trump administration has made combatting illegal immigration a central theme of its domestic policy. In his first weeks in office, Trump signed an executive order temporarily banning the citizens of Syria and six other Muslim-majority countries from entering the US. Back then, UN agencies issued a joint statement calling on Washington to continue letting refugees into the US, while many prominent figures across the globe, including world leaders spoke out against the order. Trump’s decision has also led to widespread protests internationally.
The executive order has led many to argue that while Trump himself wasn’t responsible for the regime change wars – particularly in the Middle East – which largely caused the migrant crisis, he should at least acknowledge that his country has a moral obligation to take in refugees from the destabilized nations. Vienna has openly criticized Washington, with Austrian Chancellor Christian Kern saying the US shares responsibility for the migrant crisis.
READ MORE: Outrage after Trump retweets posts from convicted British far-right extremist
“There is no doubt that America shares responsibility for the refugee flows by the way it intervened militarily,” the official said. Washington’s moves to avoid responsibility were “unacceptable for the international community,” he added.
Last month, the UN High Commissioner for Refugees Filippo Grandi announced that the number of people who had been forced to leave their homes had increased to almost 66 million worldwide, compared with 42 million in 2009. Speaking before the UN Security Council, he said that this includes 17.2 million refugees “under UNHCR’s responsibility,” registering a 70 percent increase since then. In Syria alone, 11 million people have been forcibly displaced – and with almost the same number of refugees from neighboring Iraq, the two Middle Eastern nations account for one-quarter of the global number.
The UN official cited “a succession of major new crises” as the cause behind the “massive displacement across virtually all regions,” saying that the crises in Libya, Ukraine and Yemen have significantly exacerbated the situation. Meanwhile, the head of the UN World Food Program (WFP), David Beasley has recently warned that there is a clear link between migration and hunger. The WFP director said that a second wave of migration might hit the west, as the situation in refugee camps in Africa and the Middle East is only getting worse.