This article is from the source 'guardian' and was first published or seen on . It last changed over 40 days ago and won't be checked again for changes.
You can find the current article at its original source at https://www.theguardian.com/business/2017/dec/03/cardingtons-old-airship-hangars-deserve-a-closer-look
The article has changed 5 times. There is an RSS feed of changes available.
Version 0 | Version 1 |
---|---|
Cardington’s old airship hangars deserve a closer look | Cardington’s old airship hangars deserve a closer look |
(about 1 month later) | |
Letters | |
Sun 3 Dec 2017 18.15 GMT | |
Last modified on Sun 3 Dec 2017 22.00 GMT | |
Share on Facebook | |
Share on Twitter | |
Share via Email | |
View more sharing options | |
Share on LinkedIn | |
Share on Pinterest | |
Share on Google+ | |
Share on WhatsApp | |
Share on Messenger | |
Close | |
The letters about Footprint Tools (30 November) reminded me that Ian Jack (British industry isn’t dead. It just needs new tools with a cutting edge, 25 November) seemed to see the distant silhouettes of the Cardington airship hangars as a reminder of the death of British industry. | The letters about Footprint Tools (30 November) reminded me that Ian Jack (British industry isn’t dead. It just needs new tools with a cutting edge, 25 November) seemed to see the distant silhouettes of the Cardington airship hangars as a reminder of the death of British industry. |
He should have taken a closer look. The hangars are repainted, spruced-up, and in great demand by the film industry as an ideal place to build mega-sized indoor film sets for blockbuster movies. There is even a website for film extras to help each other get to this out-of-the-way site for days of shooting. | He should have taken a closer look. The hangars are repainted, spruced-up, and in great demand by the film industry as an ideal place to build mega-sized indoor film sets for blockbuster movies. There is even a website for film extras to help each other get to this out-of-the-way site for days of shooting. |
Re-purposed, yes. Earning money for Britain, yes. Dilapidated and derelict, certainly not.Pete Eiseman-RenyardLondon | Re-purposed, yes. Earning money for Britain, yes. Dilapidated and derelict, certainly not.Pete Eiseman-RenyardLondon |
• Join the debate – email guardian.letters@theguardian.com | • Join the debate – email guardian.letters@theguardian.com |
• Read more Guardian letters – click here to visit gu.com/letters | • Read more Guardian letters – click here to visit gu.com/letters |
Productivity | |
Airline industry | |
Manufacturing sector | |
Film industry | |
letters | |
Share on Facebook | |
Share on Twitter | |
Share via Email | |
Share on LinkedIn | |
Share on Pinterest | |
Share on Google+ | |
Share on WhatsApp | |
Share on Messenger | |
Reuse this content |