This article is from the source 'guardian' and was first published or seen on . It last changed over 40 days ago and won't be checked again for changes.

You can find the current article at its original source at https://www.theguardian.com/politics/datablog/2017/dec/06/perception-reality-gap-global-poll-overestimate-bad-stuff-murder-rate-prisoners-pregnancies

The article has changed 4 times. There is an RSS feed of changes available.

Version 0 Version 1
Perception gap: global poll reveals how we overestimate the bad stuff Do you know the state of your country? Take the test, as poll reveals perception gap
(about 2 hours later)
People worldwide tend to exaggerate the proportion of foreign-born prisoners, overestimate teenage pregnancies and underestimate the health of the nation, research shows.People worldwide tend to exaggerate the proportion of foreign-born prisoners, overestimate teenage pregnancies and underestimate the health of the nation, research shows.
The worldwide Ipsos Mori survey, which reveals the gaps between perception and reality, also shows that people tend to think the murder rate – including deaths caused by terrorism – are growing when, in many cases, the opposite is true.The worldwide Ipsos Mori survey, which reveals the gaps between perception and reality, also shows that people tend to think the murder rate – including deaths caused by terrorism – are growing when, in many cases, the opposite is true.
When asked in the survey to guess how many prisoners were born in another country, the average answer by American respondents was 32% – six times higher than the actual figure (5.2% in 2014).When asked in the survey to guess how many prisoners were born in another country, the average answer by American respondents was 32% – six times higher than the actual figure (5.2% in 2014).
In the UK, the average estimate was 34%, almost three times the real figure (11.8% in England and Wales in June 2017), while Australians perceived that 40% of prisoners were foreign-born, almost twice the actual figure (18.7% in mid-2016).In the UK, the average estimate was 34%, almost three times the real figure (11.8% in England and Wales in June 2017), while Australians perceived that 40% of prisoners were foreign-born, almost twice the actual figure (18.7% in mid-2016).
Meanwhile, respondents from the Netherlands gave an average answer of 51% (the actual figure was 19.1% in September 2015).Meanwhile, respondents from the Netherlands gave an average answer of 51% (the actual figure was 19.1% in September 2015).
The survey asked people in 37 countries what proportion of teenagers gave birth each year, a question that resulted in vast gaps between perception and reality.The survey asked people in 37 countries what proportion of teenagers gave birth each year, a question that resulted in vast gaps between perception and reality.
Every country in which the survey was conducted overestimated the number of teenagers giving birth.Every country in which the survey was conducted overestimated the number of teenagers giving birth.
Brazilians, on average, thought almost one in two 15- to 19-year olds gave birth each year – whereas the figure is actually 6.7%, according to the latest World Bank data.Brazilians, on average, thought almost one in two 15- to 19-year olds gave birth each year – whereas the figure is actually 6.7%, according to the latest World Bank data.
South Africans and Colombians also hugely overestimated teenage birthrates, guessing that 44% of 15- to 19-year-olds gave birth each year (in reality the figures are 4.4% and 4.9% respectively).South Africans and Colombians also hugely overestimated teenage birthrates, guessing that 44% of 15- to 19-year-olds gave birth each year (in reality the figures are 4.4% and 4.9% respectively).
American, British and Australian respondents were also wide of the mark: the average US respondent put the figure at 24% (it is, in fact 2.1%); Britons’ average answer was 19% (in fact it was 1.4% in 2015) while Australians said 18% (it was actually 1.2%).American, British and Australian respondents were also wide of the mark: the average US respondent put the figure at 24% (it is, in fact 2.1%); Britons’ average answer was 19% (in fact it was 1.4% in 2015) while Australians said 18% (it was actually 1.2%).
Elsewhere, the survey asked people in 30 countries if the murder rate was higher or lower than in 2000. In 25 countries the murder rate fell in the intervening years and remained stable in two others.Elsewhere, the survey asked people in 30 countries if the murder rate was higher or lower than in 2000. In 25 countries the murder rate fell in the intervening years and remained stable in two others.
More than half of Americans (52%), 38% of Australians and 36% of Britons thought the murder rate was higher now despite it falling in all three countries.More than half of Americans (52%), 38% of Australians and 36% of Britons thought the murder rate was higher now despite it falling in all three countries.
The annual Ipsos/Mori Perils of Perception survey also shows that people tend to think the number of deaths caused by terrorism has increased even though, in many of the 34 countries surveyed for this question, the opposite is true.The annual Ipsos/Mori Perils of Perception survey also shows that people tend to think the number of deaths caused by terrorism has increased even though, in many of the 34 countries surveyed for this question, the opposite is true.
While 25 of these countries experienced a decrease in the number of deaths caused by terrorism in the 15 years post-9/11, many respondents said they thought things had got worse.While 25 of these countries experienced a decrease in the number of deaths caused by terrorism in the 15 years post-9/11, many respondents said they thought things had got worse.
Bobby Duffy, managing director of the Ipsos Mori Social Research Institute, said there is one key issue that leads to these misconceptions: “Our brains handle negative information differently and store it more accessibly,” he said.Bobby Duffy, managing director of the Ipsos Mori Social Research Institute, said there is one key issue that leads to these misconceptions: “Our brains handle negative information differently and store it more accessibly,” he said.
“We overestimate what we worry about: the more we see coverage of an issue, the more prevalent we think it is, especially if that coverage is vivid and threatening.”“We overestimate what we worry about: the more we see coverage of an issue, the more prevalent we think it is, especially if that coverage is vivid and threatening.”
Methodology: The Ipsos Mori Perils of Perception Survey 2017 interviewed 29,133 people in 38 countries between 28 September and 19 October 2017 with between 500 and 2000 participants in each country covered and the data was weighted to match the profile of the population. A full list of sources and links to the data can be found at http://perils.ipsos.com.Methodology: The Ipsos Mori Perils of Perception Survey 2017 interviewed 29,133 people in 38 countries between 28 September and 19 October 2017 with between 500 and 2000 participants in each country covered and the data was weighted to match the profile of the population. A full list of sources and links to the data can be found at http://perils.ipsos.com.