This article is from the source 'guardian' and was first published or seen on . It last changed over 40 days ago and won't be checked again for changes.

You can find the current article at its original source at https://www.theguardian.com/environment/2017/dec/06/bmw-electric-car-ad-banned-over-misleading-clean-car-claims

The article has changed 4 times. There is an RSS feed of changes available.

Version 0 Version 1
BMW electric car ad banned over misleading 'clean car' claims BMW electric car ad banned over misleading 'clean car' claims
(about 1 month later)
Ruling by advertising watchdog could have knock on effect on other electric car advertising
Fiona Harvey Environment correspondent
Wed 6 Dec 2017 10.46 GMT
Last modified on Thu 4 Jan 2018 11.03 GMT
Share on Facebook
Share on Twitter
Share via Email
View more sharing options
Share on LinkedIn
Share on Pinterest
Share on Google+
Share on WhatsApp
Share on Messenger
Close
The car company BMW has been censured by the UK’s advertising watchdog for claiming an electric car equipped with a small petrol engine was “clean” and “zero emissions”, in a ruling that could have a knock-on effect on other electric car advertising.The car company BMW has been censured by the UK’s advertising watchdog for claiming an electric car equipped with a small petrol engine was “clean” and “zero emissions”, in a ruling that could have a knock-on effect on other electric car advertising.
The advertising was published in the form of a Facebook post that used testimonials from real customers to extol the virtues of the BMW i3. That model is unusual among electric vehicles, as in addition to the electric drive, it also has a small petrol engine. However, unlike “hybrid” cars, which have a petrol-driven engine that can take over from the electric system when it runs out of charge, on longer journeys or at higher speeds, the i3’s petrol engine is only used to maintain the charge on the electric drive.The advertising was published in the form of a Facebook post that used testimonials from real customers to extol the virtues of the BMW i3. That model is unusual among electric vehicles, as in addition to the electric drive, it also has a small petrol engine. However, unlike “hybrid” cars, which have a petrol-driven engine that can take over from the electric system when it runs out of charge, on longer journeys or at higher speeds, the i3’s petrol engine is only used to maintain the charge on the electric drive.
In the Facebook ad the car was described as “a clean car and helps to give back to the environment”. A complainant suggested that the presence of a petrol engine meant this statement was incorrect.In the Facebook ad the car was described as “a clean car and helps to give back to the environment”. A complainant suggested that the presence of a petrol engine meant this statement was incorrect.
BMW argued that the nature of the petrol engine, in maintaining charge for the electric engine rather than taking over from it when needed, meant its description – which came from a user – was accurate. The Advertising Standards Authority (ASA) took a different view, saying that the petrol engine had an emissions value that could be quantified, and has ordered the advertisement to be withdrawn.BMW argued that the nature of the petrol engine, in maintaining charge for the electric engine rather than taking over from it when needed, meant its description – which came from a user – was accurate. The Advertising Standards Authority (ASA) took a different view, saying that the petrol engine had an emissions value that could be quantified, and has ordered the advertisement to be withdrawn.
The ASA said: “We told BMW to ensure that in future they made clear their environmental claims related to the all-electric vehicles only and not to make environmental claims about their products unless they held sufficient substantiation.”The ASA said: “We told BMW to ensure that in future they made clear their environmental claims related to the all-electric vehicles only and not to make environmental claims about their products unless they held sufficient substantiation.”
BMW did not respond to the Guardian’s request for comment. The Society of Motor Manufacturers and Traders said it did not comment on individual cases, and declined to comment on the broader issues of how “clean” cars can be defined.BMW did not respond to the Guardian’s request for comment. The Society of Motor Manufacturers and Traders said it did not comment on individual cases, and declined to comment on the broader issues of how “clean” cars can be defined.
The question of what constitutes “clean” driving is a vexed one. Electric vehicles produce no emissions at the point of use, but the power they consume does produce greenhouse gases if it comes from fossil fuels, such as coal or gas-fired power stations. This means even the cleanest electric vehicle can only have as little impact on the environment as the electricity grid from which it is powered.The question of what constitutes “clean” driving is a vexed one. Electric vehicles produce no emissions at the point of use, but the power they consume does produce greenhouse gases if it comes from fossil fuels, such as coal or gas-fired power stations. This means even the cleanest electric vehicle can only have as little impact on the environment as the electricity grid from which it is powered.
Electric, hybrid and low-emission cars
Advertising Standards Authority
Greenhouse gas emissions
Ethical and green living
Climate change
Travel and transport
news
Share on Facebook
Share on Twitter
Share via Email
Share on LinkedIn
Share on Pinterest
Share on Google+
Share on WhatsApp
Share on Messenger
Reuse this content