This article is from the source 'guardian' and was first published or seen on . It last changed over 40 days ago and won't be checked again for changes.
You can find the current article at its original source at https://www.theguardian.com/environment/2017/dec/06/switch-to-electric-transport-will-not-lead-to-surge-in-power-demand
The article has changed 4 times. There is an RSS feed of changes available.
Version 2 | Version 3 |
---|---|
Switch to electric transport will not lead to surge in power demand | Switch to electric transport will not lead to surge in power demand |
(3 days later) | |
You report that the defence firm Rolls-Royce has been lobbying for government funds to assist it to diversify into building nuclear reactors (Millions on offer to develop small nuclear plants, 4 December). It is arguing that the switch to electric transport will “drive up future demand”. | You report that the defence firm Rolls-Royce has been lobbying for government funds to assist it to diversify into building nuclear reactors (Millions on offer to develop small nuclear plants, 4 December). It is arguing that the switch to electric transport will “drive up future demand”. |
The National Grid concludes that, provided that vehicle recharging is concentrated into non-peak demand hours, even large-scale electrification of surface transport requires an increase in electricity system capacity by around 15%. | The National Grid concludes that, provided that vehicle recharging is concentrated into non-peak demand hours, even large-scale electrification of surface transport requires an increase in electricity system capacity by around 15%. |
In contrast, annual consumption levels of electricity in the UK are almost 30% lower than was being officially forecast by government forecast just a decade ago. | In contrast, annual consumption levels of electricity in the UK are almost 30% lower than was being officially forecast by government forecast just a decade ago. |
Promising to meet a fictitious increase in demand for electricity is not a compelling justification for public subsidy.Andrew WarrenChairman, British Energy Efficiency Federation | Promising to meet a fictitious increase in demand for electricity is not a compelling justification for public subsidy.Andrew WarrenChairman, British Energy Efficiency Federation |
• Join the debate – email guardian.letters@theguardian.com | • Join the debate – email guardian.letters@theguardian.com |
• Read more Guardian letters – click here to visit gu.com/letters | • Read more Guardian letters – click here to visit gu.com/letters |
Electric, hybrid and low-emission cars | Electric, hybrid and low-emission cars |
Rolls-Royce | Rolls-Royce |
Renewable energy | Renewable energy |
Energy | Energy |
Travel and transport | Travel and transport |
Self-driving cars | Self-driving cars |
letters | letters |
Share on Facebook | Share on Facebook |
Share on Twitter | Share on Twitter |
Share via Email | Share via Email |
Share on LinkedIn | Share on LinkedIn |
Share on Pinterest | Share on Pinterest |
Share on Google+ | Share on Google+ |
Share on WhatsApp | Share on WhatsApp |
Share on Messenger | Share on Messenger |
Reuse this content | Reuse this content |