This article is from the source 'guardian' and was first published or seen on . It last changed over 40 days ago and won't be checked again for changes.
You can find the current article at its original source at https://www.theguardian.com/politics/2017/dec/14/david-daviss-brexit-department-tops-government-secrecy-table
The article has changed 6 times. There is an RSS feed of changes available.
| Version 0 | Version 1 |
|---|---|
| David Davis's Brexit department tops government secrecy table | David Davis's Brexit department tops government secrecy table |
| (about 1 month later) | |
| Exclusive: Department for Exiting the EU failed to respond to more than 60% of freedom of information requests | |
| Anushka Asthana | |
| Thu 14 Dec 2017 19.33 GMT | |
| Last modified on Thu 14 Dec 2017 19.46 GMT | |
| Share on Facebook | |
| Share on Twitter | |
| Share via Email | |
| View more sharing options | |
| Share on LinkedIn | |
| Share on Pinterest | |
| Share on Google+ | |
| Share on WhatsApp | |
| Share on Messenger | |
| Close | |
| Theresa May’s key Brexit department has failed to respond to more than six out of 10 freedom of information requests over the past year, giving it the worst annual record for secrecy in Whitehall. | Theresa May’s key Brexit department has failed to respond to more than six out of 10 freedom of information requests over the past year, giving it the worst annual record for secrecy in Whitehall. |
| The Institute for Government (IFG) said the figures, included in an analysis shared exclusively with the Guardian, painted a “broader picture of government opacity” – particularly related to Britain’s departure from the EU. | The Institute for Government (IFG) said the figures, included in an analysis shared exclusively with the Guardian, painted a “broader picture of government opacity” – particularly related to Britain’s departure from the EU. |
| The figures come after David Davis had his knuckles rapped after appearing to boast about a series of reports assessing the impact of Brexit on different British sectors, which never existed. Despite MPs’ annoyance, the cabinet minister avoided a charge of contempt of parliament. | The figures come after David Davis had his knuckles rapped after appearing to boast about a series of reports assessing the impact of Brexit on different British sectors, which never existed. Despite MPs’ annoyance, the cabinet minister avoided a charge of contempt of parliament. |
| However, he could face further questions following the IFG research in which the Department for Exiting the European Union topped a list on the number of times information was fully withheld over the past year. | However, he could face further questions following the IFG research in which the Department for Exiting the European Union topped a list on the number of times information was fully withheld over the past year. |
| The Department for International Trade – also involved with Brexit planning – was worst for timeliness. It only responded within the required 20 working days (or longer with a permitted extension) 63.5% of the time – well below a target of 85%. Falling below the expected level repeatedly can result in special monitoring from the Information Commissioner’s Office. | The Department for International Trade – also involved with Brexit planning – was worst for timeliness. It only responded within the required 20 working days (or longer with a permitted extension) 63.5% of the time – well below a target of 85%. Falling below the expected level repeatedly can result in special monitoring from the Information Commissioner’s Office. |
| “DExEU’s record on freedom of information is worse than most other government departments – in two of the five quarters of its existence, it’s withheld more information than any other department,” said Gavin Freeguard, the IFG’s head of data and transparency. | “DExEU’s record on freedom of information is worse than most other government departments – in two of the five quarters of its existence, it’s withheld more information than any other department,” said Gavin Freeguard, the IFG’s head of data and transparency. |
| “This poor performance is part of a much broader picture of government opacity when it comes to Brexit. We have yet to see any serious impact assessments from departments, and are still waiting for white papers that were due to be published before the summer.” | “This poor performance is part of a much broader picture of government opacity when it comes to Brexit. We have yet to see any serious impact assessments from departments, and are still waiting for white papers that were due to be published before the summer.” |
| Over the past year Freeguard found that the Brexit department, led by Davis, granted just 18% of FoI cases in full – the lowest of any department. That was followed by the Foreign Office and Department for Trade which both provided all the requested data in 24% of cases. | Over the past year Freeguard found that the Brexit department, led by Davis, granted just 18% of FoI cases in full – the lowest of any department. That was followed by the Foreign Office and Department for Trade which both provided all the requested data in 24% of cases. |
| Meanwhile, it fully withheld information in 62% of cases, the highest proportion, followed by those of the Cabinet Office and HMRC. | Meanwhile, it fully withheld information in 62% of cases, the highest proportion, followed by those of the Cabinet Office and HMRC. |
| The statistics were marginally better when limited to the past quarter. That placed the Brexit department in third place on 55%, behind HMRC and the Cabinet Office. | The statistics were marginally better when limited to the past quarter. That placed the Brexit department in third place on 55%, behind HMRC and the Cabinet Office. |
| Freeguard found that Brexit officials used FoI exemptions more regularly than other colleagues across the government, citing international relations, the economy and formulation of government policy as reasons to keep information private. | Freeguard found that Brexit officials used FoI exemptions more regularly than other colleagues across the government, citing international relations, the economy and formulation of government policy as reasons to keep information private. |
| A separate request for information from the department – by Ben Worthy – found that it often also used the claim that requests had been “vexatious”. | A separate request for information from the department – by Ben Worthy – found that it often also used the claim that requests had been “vexatious”. |
| Officials insisted there were good reasons for the lack of data being provided. | Officials insisted there were good reasons for the lack of data being provided. |
| A DExEU spokesperson said: “The department’s purpose is to negotiate our successful exit from the European Union, and therefore a significant amount of our work is sensitive. We always strive to balance our commitment to transparency with the need to protect sensitive information that could affect our negotiating position.” | A DExEU spokesperson said: “The department’s purpose is to negotiate our successful exit from the European Union, and therefore a significant amount of our work is sensitive. We always strive to balance our commitment to transparency with the need to protect sensitive information that could affect our negotiating position.” |
| However, the IFG’s director, Bronwen Maddox, questioned the behaviour of Davis’s department. | However, the IFG’s director, Bronwen Maddox, questioned the behaviour of Davis’s department. |
| Speaking about the impact assessments, she claimed the government had shown disregard for the principle of making decisions based on evidence. | Speaking about the impact assessments, she claimed the government had shown disregard for the principle of making decisions based on evidence. |
| She said: “David Davis said to the Commons committee on exiting the EU that the government had not undertaken formal impact assessments of Brexit. This not only appeared to contradict previous ministerial assertions but also showed a disregard for the principle of making decisions based on thorough evidence and analysis. | She said: “David Davis said to the Commons committee on exiting the EU that the government had not undertaken formal impact assessments of Brexit. This not only appeared to contradict previous ministerial assertions but also showed a disregard for the principle of making decisions based on thorough evidence and analysis. |
| “This is no way to approach such a profound change in the UK’s relationship with close trading partners and allies.” | “This is no way to approach such a profound change in the UK’s relationship with close trading partners and allies.” |
| Brexit | |
| Freedom of information | |
| Civil service | |
| David Davis | |
| Foreign policy | |
| news | |
| Share on Facebook | |
| Share on Twitter | |
| Share via Email | |
| Share on LinkedIn | |
| Share on Pinterest | |
| Share on Google+ | |
| Share on WhatsApp | |
| Share on Messenger | |
| Reuse this content |