This article is from the source 'guardian' and was first published or seen on . It last changed over 40 days ago and won't be checked again for changes.

You can find the current article at its original source at https://www.theguardian.com/uk-news/2017/dec/15/scotland-yard-carrying-out-urgent-assessment-after-trial-collapses

The article has changed 4 times. There is an RSS feed of changes available.

Version 1 Version 2
Scotland Yard carrying out 'urgent review' after rape trial collapses Scotland Yard carrying out 'urgent review' after rape trial collapses
(about 1 month later)
Met officers failed to disclose messages between complainant and friends – which cast doubt on case – until close to trial
Jamie Grierson
Fri 15 Dec 2017 13.48 GMT
First published on Fri 15 Dec 2017 03.58 GMT
Share on Facebook
Share on Twitter
Share via Email
View more sharing options
Share on LinkedIn
Share on Pinterest
Share on Google+
Share on WhatsApp
Share on Messenger
Close
Scotland Yard is conducting an “urgent review” after a rape trial collapsed owing to what the prosecuting barrister on the case called “the most appalling failure of disclosure” he had encountered.Scotland Yard is conducting an “urgent review” after a rape trial collapsed owing to what the prosecuting barrister on the case called “the most appalling failure of disclosure” he had encountered.
The proceedings against Liam Allan, 22, were halted at Croydon crown court on Thursday after it emerged that police had belatedly disclosed phone messages between the complainant and her friends that threw the case into doubt.The proceedings against Liam Allan, 22, were halted at Croydon crown court on Thursday after it emerged that police had belatedly disclosed phone messages between the complainant and her friends that threw the case into doubt.
The judge called for a review of disclosure of evidence by the Metropolitan police, as well as an inquiry at the Crown Prosecution Service (CPS). The Met later confirmed it had launched an urgent assessment of what had happened.The judge called for a review of disclosure of evidence by the Metropolitan police, as well as an inquiry at the Crown Prosecution Service (CPS). The Met later confirmed it had launched an urgent assessment of what had happened.
Writing for the Times, the prosecuting barrister and former Conservative MP Jerry Hayes said: “I told the judge that this was the most appalling failure of disclosure that I have ever encountered.Writing for the Times, the prosecuting barrister and former Conservative MP Jerry Hayes said: “I told the judge that this was the most appalling failure of disclosure that I have ever encountered.
“The CPS are under terrible pressure, as are the police. Both work hard but are badly under-resourced. Crown court trials only work because of the co-operation and goodwill of advocates and the bench – but time pressures are making this increasingly difficult.“The CPS are under terrible pressure, as are the police. Both work hard but are badly under-resourced. Crown court trials only work because of the co-operation and goodwill of advocates and the bench – but time pressures are making this increasingly difficult.
“Because of the swingeing cuts that the Treasury continuously imposes, the system is not just creaking, it is about to croak.”“Because of the swingeing cuts that the Treasury continuously imposes, the system is not just creaking, it is about to croak.”
Police are understood to have looked at thousands of phone messages when reviewing evidence but it was not until the prosecution was close to trial that they were disclosed.Police are understood to have looked at thousands of phone messages when reviewing evidence but it was not until the prosecution was close to trial that they were disclosed.
The CPS offered no evidence in the case as it was decided “there was no longer a realistic prospect of conviction”.The CPS offered no evidence in the case as it was decided “there was no longer a realistic prospect of conviction”.
Speaking outside court, Allan told reporters: “I can’t explain the mental torture of the past two years. I feel betrayed by the system which I had believed would do the right thing – the system I want to work in.”Speaking outside court, Allan told reporters: “I can’t explain the mental torture of the past two years. I feel betrayed by the system which I had believed would do the right thing – the system I want to work in.”
A Scotland Yard spokesman said: “We are aware of this case being dismissed from court and are carrying out an urgent assessment to establish the circumstances which led to this action being taken.A Scotland Yard spokesman said: “We are aware of this case being dismissed from court and are carrying out an urgent assessment to establish the circumstances which led to this action being taken.
“We are working closely with the Crown Prosecution Service and keeping in close contact with the victim whilst this process takes place.”“We are working closely with the Crown Prosecution Service and keeping in close contact with the victim whilst this process takes place.”
A spokesman for the CPS said: “A charge can only be brought if a prosecutor is satisfied that both stages of the full code test in the Code for Crown Prosecutors are met, that is, that there is sufficient evidence to provide a realistic prospect of conviction and that a prosecution is required in the public interest.A spokesman for the CPS said: “A charge can only be brought if a prosecutor is satisfied that both stages of the full code test in the Code for Crown Prosecutors are met, that is, that there is sufficient evidence to provide a realistic prospect of conviction and that a prosecution is required in the public interest.
“All prosecutions are kept under continuous review and prosecutors are required to take account of any change in circumstances as the case develops.“All prosecutions are kept under continuous review and prosecutors are required to take account of any change in circumstances as the case develops.
“In November 2017, the police provided more material in the case of Liam Allan. Upon a review of that material, it was decided that there was no longer a realistic prospect of conviction.“In November 2017, the police provided more material in the case of Liam Allan. Upon a review of that material, it was decided that there was no longer a realistic prospect of conviction.
“Therefore we offered no evidence in the case against Liam Allan at a hearing on 14 December 2017. We will now be conducting a management review together with the Metropolitan police to examine the way in which this case was handled.”“Therefore we offered no evidence in the case against Liam Allan at a hearing on 14 December 2017. We will now be conducting a management review together with the Metropolitan police to examine the way in which this case was handled.”
Police
Crown Prosecution Service
UK criminal justice
Crime
news
Share on Facebook
Share on Twitter
Share via Email
Share on LinkedIn
Share on Pinterest
Share on Google+
Share on WhatsApp
Share on Messenger
Reuse this content