This article is from the source 'guardian' and was first published or seen on . It last changed over 40 days ago and won't be checked again for changes.
You can find the current article at its original source at https://www.theguardian.com/uk-news/2017/dec/20/building-regulations-experts-who-werent-heard-before-the-grenfell-tower-fire
The article has changed 5 times. There is an RSS feed of changes available.
| Version 3 | Version 4 |
|---|---|
| Building regulations experts who weren’t heard before the Grenfell Tower fire | Building regulations experts who weren’t heard before the Grenfell Tower fire |
| (13 days later) | |
| The report by Judith Hackitt (Building regulations open to abuse – Grenfell review, 19 December) highlights the “mindset of doing things as cheaply as possible and passing on responsibility for problems and shortcomings”. One longstanding and illogical result of this is the Thatcher government’s decision to introduce competition into building control. | The report by Judith Hackitt (Building regulations open to abuse – Grenfell review, 19 December) highlights the “mindset of doing things as cheaply as possible and passing on responsibility for problems and shortcomings”. One longstanding and illogical result of this is the Thatcher government’s decision to introduce competition into building control. |
| This was, and remains, the only regulatory function of local government to be subjected to competition. It was originally done as part of a deal by Michael Heseltine with Tory councillors who objected to his suggestions for the private sector to take control of planning decisions. Since then, despite frequent pleas from the Local Government Association (I was its spokesperson on building control) there has been no level playing field. The private sector recruits people who have been trained at public expense, and cherrypicks the most lucrative schemes, while leaving the rest to councils – who of course pick up the tab for enforcement. | This was, and remains, the only regulatory function of local government to be subjected to competition. It was originally done as part of a deal by Michael Heseltine with Tory councillors who objected to his suggestions for the private sector to take control of planning decisions. Since then, despite frequent pleas from the Local Government Association (I was its spokesperson on building control) there has been no level playing field. The private sector recruits people who have been trained at public expense, and cherrypicks the most lucrative schemes, while leaving the rest to councils – who of course pick up the tab for enforcement. |
| Few MPs even realise this has been going on, and many are appalled when they find out. A fair deal is well overdue.Peter KentCrewe | Few MPs even realise this has been going on, and many are appalled when they find out. A fair deal is well overdue.Peter KentCrewe |
| • Dame Judith Hackitt’s interim review of regulations lays out in detail what many of us learned from the fire at Lakanal House in 2009. Her report reinforces the need for the public inquiry to ask why the lessons from the Lakanal inquest didn’t lead to significant changes in the guidance prior to the Grenfell Tower fire. There was clearly time, and many of the experts giving evidence to Hackitt also spoke up prior to Grenfell. Did an ideological aversion to “red tape” get in the way of ministers listening to those voices, and will the inquiry dare to put the government in the dock for any failures?Jenny JonesGreen party, House of Lords | • Dame Judith Hackitt’s interim review of regulations lays out in detail what many of us learned from the fire at Lakanal House in 2009. Her report reinforces the need for the public inquiry to ask why the lessons from the Lakanal inquest didn’t lead to significant changes in the guidance prior to the Grenfell Tower fire. There was clearly time, and many of the experts giving evidence to Hackitt also spoke up prior to Grenfell. Did an ideological aversion to “red tape” get in the way of ministers listening to those voices, and will the inquiry dare to put the government in the dock for any failures?Jenny JonesGreen party, House of Lords |
| • Join the debate – email guardian.letters@theguardian.com | • Join the debate – email guardian.letters@theguardian.com |
| • Read more Guardian letters – click here to visit gu.com/letters | • Read more Guardian letters – click here to visit gu.com/letters |
| Grenfell Tower fire | Grenfell Tower fire |
| Regulators | Regulators |
| Construction industry | Construction industry |
| London | London |
| letters | letters |
| Share on Facebook | Share on Facebook |
| Share on Twitter | Share on Twitter |
| Share via Email | Share via Email |
| Share on LinkedIn | Share on LinkedIn |
| Share on Pinterest | Share on Pinterest |
| Share on Google+ | Share on Google+ |
| Share on WhatsApp | Share on WhatsApp |
| Share on Messenger | Share on Messenger |
| Reuse this content | Reuse this content |