This article is from the source 'guardian' and was first published or seen on . It last changed over 40 days ago and won't be checked again for changes.
You can find the current article at its original source at http://www.theguardian.com/politics/2017/dec/31/fine-words-alone-will-not-keep-britain-in-the-eu
The article has changed 4 times. There is an RSS feed of changes available.
| Version 1 | Version 2 |
|---|---|
| Fine words alone will not keep Britain in the EU | Fine words alone will not keep Britain in the EU |
| (30 days later) | |
| Letters | Letters |
| Sun 31 Dec 2017 18.51 GMT | Sun 31 Dec 2017 18.51 GMT |
| Last modified on Wed 14 Feb 2018 15.28 GMT | |
| Share on Facebook | Share on Facebook |
| Share on Twitter | Share on Twitter |
| Share via Email | Share via Email |
| View more sharing options | View more sharing options |
| Share on LinkedIn | Share on LinkedIn |
| Share on Pinterest | Share on Pinterest |
| Share on Google+ | Share on Google+ |
| Share on WhatsApp | Share on WhatsApp |
| Share on Messenger | Share on Messenger |
| Close | Close |
| Natalie Nougayrède (Opinion, 30 December) suggests that France’s President Macron could stop Brexit. Maybe, but fine words alone will not be much use. The EU will have to make a significant concession that might change public opinion in the UK. | Natalie Nougayrède (Opinion, 30 December) suggests that France’s President Macron could stop Brexit. Maybe, but fine words alone will not be much use. The EU will have to make a significant concession that might change public opinion in the UK. |
| When the EU was enlarged in 2004 existing members were entitled to take advantage of transitional arrangements limiting the flow of migrants from eastern Europe for up to seven years. Three countries – the UK, Ireland and Sweden – waived their right to restrict free movement. In the UK’s case, we did so on the basis of research that grossly underestimated the likely flow of migrants. If the EU wants us to stay, why not offer the UK all or part of the moratorium that we unwisely turned down last time around? A long shot, I know, but worth a try.Chris MullinAlnwick, Northumberland | When the EU was enlarged in 2004 existing members were entitled to take advantage of transitional arrangements limiting the flow of migrants from eastern Europe for up to seven years. Three countries – the UK, Ireland and Sweden – waived their right to restrict free movement. In the UK’s case, we did so on the basis of research that grossly underestimated the likely flow of migrants. If the EU wants us to stay, why not offer the UK all or part of the moratorium that we unwisely turned down last time around? A long shot, I know, but worth a try.Chris MullinAlnwick, Northumberland |
| • Lord Adonis’s resignation letter probably tells us much more about recent British politics than he realises (Adonis quits, calling May the ‘voice of Ukip’, 30 December). He describes Brexit as “a populist and nationalist spasm” – challenging the ability of the people of this country to make decisions about their own future. | • Lord Adonis’s resignation letter probably tells us much more about recent British politics than he realises (Adonis quits, calling May the ‘voice of Ukip’, 30 December). He describes Brexit as “a populist and nationalist spasm” – challenging the ability of the people of this country to make decisions about their own future. |
| As a remain voter I regret the decision to leave the EU, but the consensus politics and “cooperation across parties” that he advocates reflect a society where the needs of ordinary people are continuously ignored. No wonder they used the EU referendum to stick two fingers up at the establishment. What gives him, and his fellow unelected peers, the right to “oppose it relentlessly” from the House of Lords?Declan O’NeillOldham | As a remain voter I regret the decision to leave the EU, but the consensus politics and “cooperation across parties” that he advocates reflect a society where the needs of ordinary people are continuously ignored. No wonder they used the EU referendum to stick two fingers up at the establishment. What gives him, and his fellow unelected peers, the right to “oppose it relentlessly” from the House of Lords?Declan O’NeillOldham |
| • Join the debate – email guardian.letters@theguardian.com | • Join the debate – email guardian.letters@theguardian.com |
| • Read more Guardian letters – click here to visit gu.com/letters | • Read more Guardian letters – click here to visit gu.com/letters |
| Brexit | Brexit |
| Immigration and asylum | Immigration and asylum |
| Andrew Adonis | Andrew Adonis |
| Article 50 | Article 50 |
| European Union | European Union |
| Foreign policy | Foreign policy |
| letters | letters |
| Share on Facebook | Share on Facebook |
| Share on Twitter | Share on Twitter |
| Share via Email | Share via Email |
| Share on LinkedIn | Share on LinkedIn |
| Share on Pinterest | Share on Pinterest |
| Share on Google+ | Share on Google+ |
| Share on WhatsApp | Share on WhatsApp |
| Share on Messenger | Share on Messenger |
| Reuse this content | Reuse this content |