This article is from the source 'bbc' and was first published or seen on . It will not be checked again for changes.

You can find the current article at its original source at http://news.bbc.co.uk/go/rss/-/1/hi/england/northamptonshire/7595860.stm

The article has changed 10 times. There is an RSS feed of changes available.

Version 5 Version 6
Officers sacked for youth attack Officers sacked for youth attack
(about 1 hour later)
Two policemen have been sacked and a third told to resign after they assaulted a teenager and then tried to cover it up. Two policemen have been sacked and a third told to resign for assaulting and threatening a 16-year-old boy and then trying to cover up their actions.
The IPCC said William Docherty, 42 and Sean Holiditch, 43, of Northamptonshire Police, were found guilty of seven charges by a disciplinary hearing. Northamptonshire officers William Docherty, 42, and Sean Holiditch, 43, were found guilty of seven charges at a disciplinary hearing, the IPCC said.
Another officer, Steve Eaton, 50, was required to resign after pleading guilty to three charges. Steve Eaton, 50, was required to resign after pleading guilty to three charges.
IPCC Commissioner Amerdeep Somal branded the officers a "disgrace". IPCC commissioner Amerdeep Somal said their actions in arresting the boy, who had breached bail, were a "disgrace".
Disciplinary hearingDisciplinary hearing
The Independent Police Complaints Commission (IPCC) looked into allegations that the officers, based at Campbell Square, Northampton, assaulted and threatened the youth, then attempted to pervert the course of justice. The Independent Police Complaints Commission (IPCC) looked into allegations that the trio, based at Campbell Square, Northampton, assaulted and threatened the youth, then attempted to pervert the course of justice.
The 16-year-old was arrested in Daventry in November 2006, after running from a car which was initially believed to be stolen. The allegations included causing a police sergeant to make an incorrect entry in the custody log and threatening to fabricate evidence following the teenager's arrest in Daventry on 24 November 2006.
The boy, also wanted for failing to appear in court, was arrested at about 1930 GMT after running from a car which was initially believed to be stolen, but did not arrive at the custody suite in Northampton until just before 2200 GMT.
They abused their position of authority by using violence and threats to intimidate this youth and cover up the matter Amerdeep Somal, IPCC commissionerThey abused their position of authority by using violence and threats to intimidate this youth and cover up the matter Amerdeep Somal, IPCC commissioner
He had been wanted for breach of bail and was on warrant for failing to appear at court.
He was arrested at 1930 GMT but he did not arrive at the custody suite in Northampton until just before 2200 GMT later that evening.
The youth claimed that during the two-and-a-half hour period the officers used a disabling pepper spray on him and threatened and intimidated him while driving him around the Daventry area. He said they also tried to plant drugs on him.The youth claimed that during the two-and-a-half hour period the officers used a disabling pepper spray on him and threatened and intimidated him while driving him around the Daventry area. He said they also tried to plant drugs on him.
It later transpired that the car was not stolen.
The officers, who were part of the Northamptonshire West Tactical Team, were subsequently charged with the criminal offence of misconduct in public office and one was charged with assault.The officers, who were part of the Northamptonshire West Tactical Team, were subsequently charged with the criminal offence of misconduct in public office and one was charged with assault.
However, a decision was later taken by the Crown Prosecution Service (CPS) not to proceed with a criminal prosecution.However, a decision was later taken by the Crown Prosecution Service (CPS) not to proceed with a criminal prosecution.
Following this decision the force decided that the officers would face a disciplinary hearing. A CPS spokesman said it had discontinued the case due to a legal ruling, which left them "in a position where they could not offer any evidence".
The spokesman said: "We charged all three officers concerned with malfeasance [legally unjustified act] in public office and one of them with assault occasioning actual bodily harm.
"While the case was in court, a legal ruling was made that meant that we could no longer continue the prosecution."
Following this decision, the force decided that the officers would face a disciplinary hearing.
Unacceptable behaviourUnacceptable behaviour
IPCC commissioner Ms Somal said: "The actions of these officers were totally unacceptable.IPCC commissioner Ms Somal said: "The actions of these officers were totally unacceptable.
"They abused their position of authority by using violence and threats to intimidate this youth and cover up the matter."They abused their position of authority by using violence and threats to intimidate this youth and cover up the matter.
"They have brought disgrace upon themselves and the force and I applaud the fact that decisive action has been taken against them.""They have brought disgrace upon themselves and the force and I applaud the fact that decisive action has been taken against them."
Assistant Chief Constable Derek Talbot, of Northamptonshire Police, said: "These three officers originally faced charges that were withdrawn by the CPS with our agreement.Assistant Chief Constable Derek Talbot, of Northamptonshire Police, said: "These three officers originally faced charges that were withdrawn by the CPS with our agreement.
"Despite this fact, we decided that the matter was so serious that they should face a disciplinary panel."Despite this fact, we decided that the matter was so serious that they should face a disciplinary panel.
"The outcome reinforces that fact that Northamptonshire Police demands and expects a high standard of behaviour from its officers and will act when these standards are breached.""The outcome reinforces that fact that Northamptonshire Police demands and expects a high standard of behaviour from its officers and will act when these standards are breached."
In a statement, the CPS said it had discontinued the case due to a legal ruling, but declined to give further details.
A CPS spokesperson said: "We charged all three officers concerned with malfeasance [legally unjustified act] in public office and one of them with assault occasioning actual bodily harm.
"While the case was in court, a legal ruling was made that meant that we could no longer continue the prosecution."