This article is from the source 'guardian' and was first published or seen on . It last changed over 40 days ago and won't be checked again for changes.

You can find the current article at its original source at https://www.theguardian.com/education/2018/jan/16/uk-training-body-took-out-superinjunction-to-block-critical-report-ofsted

The article has changed 3 times. There is an RSS feed of changes available.

Version 0 Version 1
UK training body took out superinjunction to block critical report UK training body took out superinjunction to block critical report
(about 4 hours later)
Learndirect got special treatment to suppress damning assessment of its training, says Ofsted chiefLearndirect got special treatment to suppress damning assessment of its training, says Ofsted chief
Rajeev SyalRajeev Syal
Tue 16 Jan 2018 10.22 GMTTue 16 Jan 2018 10.22 GMT
Last modified on Tue 16 Jan 2018 10.23 GMT Last modified on Tue 16 Jan 2018 14.10 GMT
Share on FacebookShare on Facebook
Share on TwitterShare on Twitter
Share via EmailShare via Email
View more sharing optionsView more sharing options
Share on LinkedInShare on LinkedIn
Share on PinterestShare on Pinterest
Share on Google+Share on Google+
Share on WhatsAppShare on WhatsApp
Share on MessengerShare on Messenger
CloseClose
Britain’s biggest training provider successfully applied for a superinjunction that stopped official inspectors from passing on a critical report to the government, it has emerged.Britain’s biggest training provider successfully applied for a superinjunction that stopped official inspectors from passing on a critical report to the government, it has emerged.
It allowed Learndirect, which is mostly funded by the Department for Education, to suppress a damning assessment of its training for four months, Ofsted’s chief inspector, Amanda Spielman, told the House of Commons public accounts committee.It allowed Learndirect, which is mostly funded by the Department for Education, to suppress a damning assessment of its training for four months, Ofsted’s chief inspector, Amanda Spielman, told the House of Commons public accounts committee.
The disclosure followed a National Audit Office report that concluded Learndirect was given special treatment by officials allowing it to retain its contracts for almost a year after a critical Ofsted report – far longer than the usual three-month termination period.The disclosure followed a National Audit Office report that concluded Learndirect was given special treatment by officials allowing it to retain its contracts for almost a year after a critical Ofsted report – far longer than the usual three-month termination period.
It comes as ministers have been left scrambling to explain how Carillion, the collapsed outsourcing firm, was allowed to continue applying for public money despite multiple warnings.It comes as ministers have been left scrambling to explain how Carillion, the collapsed outsourcing firm, was allowed to continue applying for public money despite multiple warnings.
The existence of the superinjunction was disclosed by Spielman in testimony described as “staggering” by the committee chair, Meg Hillier.The existence of the superinjunction was disclosed by Spielman in testimony described as “staggering” by the committee chair, Meg Hillier.
Spielman said Learndirect’s managers tried to obstruct the work of Ofsted inspectors last March and applied to the high court for a judicial review following a grade 4 inspection.Spielman said Learndirect’s managers tried to obstruct the work of Ofsted inspectors last March and applied to the high court for a judicial review following a grade 4 inspection.
“An application was made for an injunction before the election period was up and the court, somewhat bizarrely and without reference to us, granted a superinjunction which made it impossible for any discussion whatever to happen even between us and the Education and Skills Funding Agency (ESFA). “An application was made for an injunction before the election period was up and the court, somewhat bizarrely and without reference to us, granted a superinjunction which made it impossible for any discussion whatever to happen even between us and the Education and Skills Funding Agency (Esfa).
Spielman added: “Why it was granted was baffling. From that application, which was made before the election, through until the judgment was handed down, no part of government could talk to the other part of government about the situation, nor would they have been able to discuss with third parties the handling, because it was not possible to discuss this pending judgment.”Spielman added: “Why it was granted was baffling. From that application, which was made before the election, through until the judgment was handed down, no part of government could talk to the other part of government about the situation, nor would they have been able to discuss with third parties the handling, because it was not possible to discuss this pending judgment.”
Andy Palmer, Learndirect’s chief executive, said he was unaware that such an injunction would stop Ofsted from speaking with the ESFA and did not agree that he had wasted money that had come from the taxpayer. Andy Palmer, Learndirect’s chief executive, said he was unaware that such an injunction would stop Ofsted from speaking with the Esfa and did not agree that he had wasted money that had come from the taxpayer.
“What we asked for was that the report was not published. I don’t recall asking for such an injunction so as such the departments couldn’t talk to each other about the case,” he said. “I think this was justified because any publication of the report would damage the company.”“What we asked for was that the report was not published. I don’t recall asking for such an injunction so as such the departments couldn’t talk to each other about the case,” he said. “I think this was justified because any publication of the report would damage the company.”
Asked if he was stalling for time while being paid public money for contracts, Palmer said the report was an unfair reflection on the quality of training.Asked if he was stalling for time while being paid public money for contracts, Palmer said the report was an unfair reflection on the quality of training.
Hiller cast doubt upon Palmer’s explanation: “You stalled the publication of the Ofsted report which kept you ticking along, which kept public money coming in to your coffers. Hiller cast doubt upon Palmer’s explanation: “You stalled the publication of the Ofsted report, which kept you ticking along, which kept public money coming in to your coffers.
“The general election then happened which kicked it into the next funding round. It is not believable that you did this because you were miffed about the report. It seems that you delayed it and then tried to delay it again through judicial means,” she said.“The general election then happened which kicked it into the next funding round. It is not believable that you did this because you were miffed about the report. It seems that you delayed it and then tried to delay it again through judicial means,” she said.
Learndirect, which is owned by LDC, the private equity arm of Lloyds Banking Group, has received more than £600m in public funding since being privatised in 2011, according to the thinktank the Institute for Public Policy Research.Learndirect, which is owned by LDC, the private equity arm of Lloyds Banking Group, has received more than £600m in public funding since being privatised in 2011, according to the thinktank the Institute for Public Policy Research.
OfstedOfsted
SuperinjunctionsSuperinjunctions
InjunctionsInjunctions
newsnews
Share on FacebookShare on Facebook
Share on TwitterShare on Twitter
Share via EmailShare via Email
Share on LinkedInShare on LinkedIn
Share on PinterestShare on Pinterest
Share on Google+Share on Google+
Share on WhatsAppShare on WhatsApp
Share on MessengerShare on Messenger
Reuse this contentReuse this content