This article is from the source 'guardian' and was first published or seen on . It last changed over 40 days ago and won't be checked again for changes.

You can find the current article at its original source at https://www.theguardian.com/artanddesign/2018/jan/21/fresh-hope-for-art-loan-schemes

The article has changed 4 times. There is an RSS feed of changes available.

Version 2 Version 3
Fresh hope for art loan schemes Fresh hope for art loan schemes
(about 1 month later)
Vivien Lovell recalls a picture loan scheme she introduced in Tower Hamlets in the late 70s, and Ros Napier says her library in Solihull also lent reproductions of famous art
Letters
Sun 21 Jan 2018 17.34 GMT
Last modified on Wed 24 Jan 2018 11.36 GMT
Share on Facebook
Share on Twitter
Share via Email
View more sharing options
Share on LinkedIn
Share on Pinterest
Share on Google+
Share on WhatsApp
Share on Messenger
Close
Professor Terry Gifford’s letter (Welcome return of School Prints loans, 18 January) prompted me to remember how, as visual arts officer for the London borough of Tower Hamlets in the late 70s and early 80s, I introduced a picture loan scheme operated through the library service. Original paintings, drawings and prints by local artists (who at that time included emerging names such as Anish Kapoor and Shirazeh Houshiary) were bought by the borough. For a token sum, residents could borrow work to hang at home for three months. It was immensely successful, stimulating public interest in contemporary art. Artworks were lovingly cared for. They were also for sale, in which event we applied artists’ resale royalties, then a relatively new principle in the UK. The scheme continued under my successor, Sally Williams, but subsequently the collection was probably dispersed within the council offices. It would be interesting to know what happened to it. Very few other boroughs operated such schemes at the time; Hammersmith and Fulham was one.Professor Terry Gifford’s letter (Welcome return of School Prints loans, 18 January) prompted me to remember how, as visual arts officer for the London borough of Tower Hamlets in the late 70s and early 80s, I introduced a picture loan scheme operated through the library service. Original paintings, drawings and prints by local artists (who at that time included emerging names such as Anish Kapoor and Shirazeh Houshiary) were bought by the borough. For a token sum, residents could borrow work to hang at home for three months. It was immensely successful, stimulating public interest in contemporary art. Artworks were lovingly cared for. They were also for sale, in which event we applied artists’ resale royalties, then a relatively new principle in the UK. The scheme continued under my successor, Sally Williams, but subsequently the collection was probably dispersed within the council offices. It would be interesting to know what happened to it. Very few other boroughs operated such schemes at the time; Hammersmith and Fulham was one.
My inspiration for the Tower Hamlets scheme came from the Leicestershire schools art collection, introduced in the 50s and funded through a Percent for Art scheme whereby the budget for every new school included a percentage for art acquisitions and indeed commissions. Some works, including a Balthus, purportedly gained in value such that they became impossible to insure. A further inspiration was the picture loan scheme introduced by Alastair Grieve at my university, UEA, in the late 1960s; prints by Albers, Pasmore and others could adorn student walls for three months.My inspiration for the Tower Hamlets scheme came from the Leicestershire schools art collection, introduced in the 50s and funded through a Percent for Art scheme whereby the budget for every new school included a percentage for art acquisitions and indeed commissions. Some works, including a Balthus, purportedly gained in value such that they became impossible to insure. A further inspiration was the picture loan scheme introduced by Alastair Grieve at my university, UEA, in the late 1960s; prints by Albers, Pasmore and others could adorn student walls for three months.
Given the extraordinary talent and output of artists today, there is surely the opportunity to introduce further art loan schemes through public galleries. The Hepworth is a new beacon of hope in this respect.Vivien LovellPublic art curator, Modus Operandi, LondonGiven the extraordinary talent and output of artists today, there is surely the opportunity to introduce further art loan schemes through public galleries. The Hepworth is a new beacon of hope in this respect.Vivien LovellPublic art curator, Modus Operandi, London
• Years ago our local library in Solihull also lent reproductions of famous art. Each picture was numbered and given a two-word title. We greatly enjoyed having Picasso’s “Woman with” for a fortnight, but our favourite was a Turner seascape entitled “Colliers Heaving”.Ros NapierBirmingham• Years ago our local library in Solihull also lent reproductions of famous art. Each picture was numbered and given a two-word title. We greatly enjoyed having Picasso’s “Woman with” for a fortnight, but our favourite was a Turner seascape entitled “Colliers Heaving”.Ros NapierBirmingham
• Join the debate – email guardian.letters@theguardian.com• Join the debate – email guardian.letters@theguardian.com
• Read more Guardian letters – click here to visit gu.com/letters• Read more Guardian letters – click here to visit gu.com/letters
ArtArt
LondonLondon
University of East AngliaUniversity of East Anglia
Higher educationHigher education
Local governmentLocal government
LibrariesLibraries
lettersletters
Share on FacebookShare on Facebook
Share on TwitterShare on Twitter
Share via EmailShare via Email
Share on LinkedInShare on LinkedIn
Share on PinterestShare on Pinterest
Share on Google+Share on Google+
Share on WhatsAppShare on WhatsApp
Share on MessengerShare on Messenger
Reuse this contentReuse this content