This article is from the source 'guardian' and was first published or seen on . It last changed over 40 days ago and won't be checked again for changes.
You can find the current article at its original source at https://www.theguardian.com/society/2018/jan/23/prison-service-must-be-held-to-account
The article has changed 3 times. There is an RSS feed of changes available.
Version 1 | Version 2 |
---|---|
Prison service must be held to account | Prison service must be held to account |
(about 1 month later) | |
The devastating report on Liverpool prison describes a broken institution (Liverpool prison has ‘worst conditions inspectors have seen’, 19 January). The squalid conditions and institutionalised degradation of prisoners is shocking. It also reveals the unofficial punishments used by staff, inadequate scrutiny of the high use of force, the treatment of black and minority ethnic prisoners, the dismissive attitude towards prisoners, the non-investigation of unexplained injuries and the lack of first-night supervision, so crucial in preventing self-inflicted deaths. | The devastating report on Liverpool prison describes a broken institution (Liverpool prison has ‘worst conditions inspectors have seen’, 19 January). The squalid conditions and institutionalised degradation of prisoners is shocking. It also reveals the unofficial punishments used by staff, inadequate scrutiny of the high use of force, the treatment of black and minority ethnic prisoners, the dismissive attitude towards prisoners, the non-investigation of unexplained injuries and the lack of first-night supervision, so crucial in preventing self-inflicted deaths. |
As with Nottingham prison, where the inspectorate found serious failures in safety, repeated in earlier reports, previous recommendations for improving the Liverpool regime have been effectively ignored. This raises issues about the lamentable complacency around accountability at all levels of the prison service and government and the lack of any oversight body to monitor and follow up on actions taken after prison inspections, investigations and inquests into prison deaths. What will it take to change this lack of accountability, particularly around deaths in custody? Utilising the Corporate Manslaughter and Corporate Homicide Act 2007 would be a start. Not only is the prison system broken, so too are the current mechanisms for ensuring its accountability. | As with Nottingham prison, where the inspectorate found serious failures in safety, repeated in earlier reports, previous recommendations for improving the Liverpool regime have been effectively ignored. This raises issues about the lamentable complacency around accountability at all levels of the prison service and government and the lack of any oversight body to monitor and follow up on actions taken after prison inspections, investigations and inquests into prison deaths. What will it take to change this lack of accountability, particularly around deaths in custody? Utilising the Corporate Manslaughter and Corporate Homicide Act 2007 would be a start. Not only is the prison system broken, so too are the current mechanisms for ensuring its accountability. |
Ultimately, however, the only way to halt the morally indefensible tide of prison deaths and safety concerns is to dramatically reduce the prison population, invest in community alternatives and transform the nature and culture of prisons so they become places of last resort, where rehabilitation is more than a rhetorical fantasy. This course of action will truly contribute to the safety and wellbeing of prisoners, caring staff and the wider public. | Ultimately, however, the only way to halt the morally indefensible tide of prison deaths and safety concerns is to dramatically reduce the prison population, invest in community alternatives and transform the nature and culture of prisons so they become places of last resort, where rehabilitation is more than a rhetorical fantasy. This course of action will truly contribute to the safety and wellbeing of prisoners, caring staff and the wider public. |
Deborah Coles Director, Inquest Professor Joe Sim Liverpool John Moores University Professor Steve Tombs The Open University | Deborah Coles Director, Inquest Professor Joe Sim Liverpool John Moores University Professor Steve Tombs The Open University |
• Join the debate – email guardian.letters@theguardian.com | • Join the debate – email guardian.letters@theguardian.com |
• Read more Guardian letters – click here to visit gu.com/letters | • Read more Guardian letters – click here to visit gu.com/letters |
Prisons and probation | Prisons and probation |
UK criminal justice | UK criminal justice |
Liverpool | Liverpool |
letters | letters |
Share on Facebook | Share on Facebook |
Share on Twitter | Share on Twitter |
Share via Email | Share via Email |
Share on LinkedIn | Share on LinkedIn |
Share on Pinterest | Share on Pinterest |
Share on Google+ | Share on Google+ |
Share on WhatsApp | Share on WhatsApp |
Share on Messenger | Share on Messenger |
Reuse this content | Reuse this content |