This article is from the source 'guardian' and was first published or seen on . It last changed over 40 days ago and won't be checked again for changes.

You can find the current article at its original source at https://www.theguardian.com/media/2018/jan/24/press-regulator-ipso-first-legal-challenges-rulings-muslim-problem

The article has changed 3 times. There is an RSS feed of changes available.

Version 0 Version 1
Press regulator Ipso faces first legal challenges to rulings Press regulator Ipso faces first legal challenges to rulings
(about 7 hours later)
Complaints are over decisions on two articles, one of which referred to ‘the Muslim problem’Complaints are over decisions on two articles, one of which referred to ‘the Muslim problem’
Owen Bowcott and Owen Bowcott and
Graham RuddickGraham Ruddick
Wed 24 Jan 2018 14.26 GMTWed 24 Jan 2018 14.26 GMT
Last modified on Wed 24 Jan 2018 14.42 GMT Last modified on Wed 24 Jan 2018 22.00 GMT
Share on FacebookShare on Facebook
Share on TwitterShare on Twitter
Share via EmailShare via Email
View more sharing optionsView more sharing options
Share on LinkedInShare on LinkedIn
Share on PinterestShare on Pinterest
Share on Google+Share on Google+
Share on WhatsAppShare on WhatsApp
Share on MessengerShare on Messenger
CloseClose
The Independent Press Standards Organisation is facing the first legal challenges to its rulings, including one over a column in the Sun that referred to “the Muslim problem”.The Independent Press Standards Organisation is facing the first legal challenges to its rulings, including one over a column in the Sun that referred to “the Muslim problem”.
The threat of bringing the press watchdog, founded in 2014, before the courts raises fundamental questions about media regulation and Ipso’s public accountability.The threat of bringing the press watchdog, founded in 2014, before the courts raises fundamental questions about media regulation and Ipso’s public accountability.
One of the challenges is being brought by Rachel Elgy, an expert in equality training and a part-time student, who complained about a comment piece by Trevor Kavanagh, the Sun’s former political editor.One of the challenges is being brought by Rachel Elgy, an expert in equality training and a part-time student, who complained about a comment piece by Trevor Kavanagh, the Sun’s former political editor.
Ipso ruled in October that the column did not breach accuracy or discrimination clauses in the editors’ code of practice. It said Kavanagh “was entitled to speculate on the validity of the status of refugees entering Germany, and the reference to ‘a million more so-called refugees’ was clearly presented as his speculation”.Ipso ruled in October that the column did not breach accuracy or discrimination clauses in the editors’ code of practice. It said Kavanagh “was entitled to speculate on the validity of the status of refugees entering Germany, and the reference to ‘a million more so-called refugees’ was clearly presented as his speculation”.
Kavanagh was a member of Ipso’s board when he wrote the article last summer and during its consideration of the complaint. His position prompted claims that the organisation was biased in his favour.Kavanagh was a member of Ipso’s board when he wrote the article last summer and during its consideration of the complaint. His position prompted claims that the organisation was biased in his favour.
The Sun article led to a fierce backlash when it was published, with more than 100 MPs from major parties signing an open letter to the paper, criticising the piece for using “Nazi-like language” regarding the Muslim community in Britain.The Sun article led to a fierce backlash when it was published, with more than 100 MPs from major parties signing an open letter to the paper, criticising the piece for using “Nazi-like language” regarding the Muslim community in Britain.
Kavanagh subsequently apologised for causing offence, saying: “I can honestly say it never occurred to me that this could be interpreted as a play on ‘the Jewish problem’ and I will happily apologise to anyone who is thus offended.”Kavanagh subsequently apologised for causing offence, saying: “I can honestly say it never occurred to me that this could be interpreted as a play on ‘the Jewish problem’ and I will happily apologise to anyone who is thus offended.”
Elgy has begun a crowdfunding appeal to pay for her judicial review challenge. She told the Guardian: “It feels like journalists regulated by Ipso feel they can say anything and they are protected. It ends up with them seeming to be above the law.Elgy has begun a crowdfunding appeal to pay for her judicial review challenge. She told the Guardian: “It feels like journalists regulated by Ipso feel they can say anything and they are protected. It ends up with them seeming to be above the law.
“A press standards organisation should be finding where journalists are not upholding good standards. That should be [its] role.”“A press standards organisation should be finding where journalists are not upholding good standards. That should be [its] role.”
Her claim alleges that Ipso’s ruling is flawed because the article was inaccurate, discriminatory and could incite hatred. It says Ipso’s conclusions were flawed under its code and inconsistent with previous rulings.Her claim alleges that Ipso’s ruling is flawed because the article was inaccurate, discriminatory and could incite hatred. It says Ipso’s conclusions were flawed under its code and inconsistent with previous rulings.
Another legal challenge is being prepared against Ipso’s ruling on the Sunday Times’ reporting of a public meeting organised last year by the Balfour Apology Campaign. It has not yet come to court.Another legal challenge is being prepared against Ipso’s ruling on the Sunday Times’ reporting of a public meeting organised last year by the Balfour Apology Campaign. It has not yet come to court.
Ipso declined to comment on the judicial reviews. In its decision rejecting the complaint over the Sun article, the regulator said: “The board has no role in the consideration of individual complaints, which are adjudicated on by the complaints committee. Mr Kavanagh played no part in the consideration of this complaint.”Ipso declined to comment on the judicial reviews. In its decision rejecting the complaint over the Sun article, the regulator said: “The board has no role in the consideration of individual complaints, which are adjudicated on by the complaints committee. Mr Kavanagh played no part in the consideration of this complaint.”
Kavanagh stood down from the Ipso board at the end of 2017 after serving two years of a three-year term.Kavanagh stood down from the Ipso board at the end of 2017 after serving two years of a three-year term.
IpsoIpso
Newspapers & magazinesNewspapers & magazines
Press regulationPress regulation
National newspapersNational newspapers
NewspapersNewspapers
Trevor KavanaghTrevor Kavanagh
newsnews
Share on FacebookShare on Facebook
Share on TwitterShare on Twitter
Share via EmailShare via Email
Share on LinkedInShare on LinkedIn
Share on PinterestShare on Pinterest
Share on Google+Share on Google+
Share on WhatsAppShare on WhatsApp
Share on MessengerShare on Messenger
Reuse this contentReuse this content