This article is from the source 'guardian' and was first published or seen on . It last changed over 40 days ago and won't be checked again for changes.
You can find the current article at its original source at https://www.theguardian.com/uk-news/2018/jan/28/salford-block-residents-must-pay-fire-wardens-grenfell
The article has changed 7 times. There is an RSS feed of changes available.
Version 1 | Version 2 |
---|---|
Salford block residents must pay £100,000 for fire wardens | Salford block residents must pay £100,000 for fire wardens |
(about 1 hour later) | |
Court rules that owner can enforce charges at building with cladding similar to Grenfell | Court rules that owner can enforce charges at building with cladding similar to Grenfell |
Josh Halliday North of England correspondent | Josh Halliday North of England correspondent |
Sun 28 Jan 2018 10.04 GMT | Sun 28 Jan 2018 10.04 GMT |
Last modified on Sun 28 Jan 2018 11.41 GMT | |
Share on Facebook | Share on Facebook |
Share on Twitter | Share on Twitter |
Share via Email | Share via Email |
View more sharing options | View more sharing options |
Share on LinkedIn | Share on LinkedIn |
Share on Pinterest | Share on Pinterest |
Share on Google+ | Share on Google+ |
Share on WhatsApp | Share on WhatsApp |
Share on Messenger | Share on Messenger |
Close | Close |
Residents in an upmarket apartment block with cladding similar to Grenfell Tower have been told they must foot a £100,000 bill for fire wardens. | Residents in an upmarket apartment block with cladding similar to Grenfell Tower have been told they must foot a £100,000 bill for fire wardens. |
Leaseholders said they feared they would no longer be able to afford to live in the new-build Fresh building in Salford following a court ruling on Friday. | Leaseholders said they feared they would no longer be able to afford to live in the new-build Fresh building in Salford following a court ruling on Friday. |
A tribunal judge ruled in favour of the freeholder E&J Estates, owned by the property tycoon James Tuttiett, to enforce the charges to pay for interim fire wardens. | A tribunal judge ruled in favour of the freeholder E&J Estates, owned by the property tycoon James Tuttiett, to enforce the charges to pay for interim fire wardens. |
The ruling, which could affect leaseholders across Britain, came after cladding on the Fresh building was found to be unsafe following the Grenfell fire. | The ruling, which could affect leaseholders across Britain, came after cladding on the Fresh building was found to be unsafe following the Grenfell fire. |
Some of the more than 120 residents in the Fresh building said their service charges would triple after the ruling, meaning they may be forced to move. | Some of the more than 120 residents in the Fresh building said their service charges would triple after the ruling, meaning they may be forced to move. |
Matthew Crisp, 29, said his service charge had increased from £125 to £360 a month to pay for the interim fire marshals. | Matthew Crisp, 29, said his service charge had increased from £125 to £360 a month to pay for the interim fire marshals. |
“I’m worried this now sets a precedent for us to foot the bill for the cladding too, and that’s devastating, as I don’t know if I’ll be able to continue living in my home,” he told Manchester Evening News. | “I’m worried this now sets a precedent for us to foot the bill for the cladding too, and that’s devastating, as I don’t know if I’ll be able to continue living in my home,” he told Manchester Evening News. |
“If I have to keep paying this, it’s going to change my life. Most of my income will go on this. Ultimately, I don’t know if I’ll be able to carry on living here.” | “If I have to keep paying this, it’s going to change my life. Most of my income will go on this. Ultimately, I don’t know if I’ll be able to carry on living here.” |
A spokesman for E&J said: “These works are essential and urgent, but we absolutely recognise the significant cost to leaseholders. We will do everything we can to keep costs to a minimum, but the safety of the residents is our absolute priority. | A spokesman for E&J said: “These works are essential and urgent, but we absolutely recognise the significant cost to leaseholders. We will do everything we can to keep costs to a minimum, but the safety of the residents is our absolute priority. |
“We are now loaning short-term funds to the service charge account to help cover the additional costs currently being incurred, and we are working with a number of stakeholders to try to find a longer term solution to help leaseholders in meeting these costs.” | “We are now loaning short-term funds to the service charge account to help cover the additional costs currently being incurred, and we are working with a number of stakeholders to try to find a longer term solution to help leaseholders in meeting these costs.” |
Residents in the Fresh building are the latest to be hit with a large bill for fire safety works since Grenfell. | Residents in the Fresh building are the latest to be hit with a large bill for fire safety works since Grenfell. |
Last week, residents in another upmarket apartment block in Manchester said they had been billed £175,000 for measures. Cladding stripped from their building had “non fire retardant” written on the back, it emerged. | Last week, residents in another upmarket apartment block in Manchester said they had been billed £175,000 for measures. Cladding stripped from their building had “non fire retardant” written on the back, it emerged. |
Salford | Salford |
Grenfell Tower fire | Grenfell Tower fire |
Greater Manchester | Greater Manchester |
Property | Property |
Leasehold | Leasehold |
Housing | Housing |
news | news |
Share on Facebook | Share on Facebook |
Share on Twitter | Share on Twitter |
Share via Email | Share via Email |
Share on LinkedIn | Share on LinkedIn |
Share on Pinterest | Share on Pinterest |
Share on Google+ | Share on Google+ |
Share on WhatsApp | Share on WhatsApp |
Share on Messenger | Share on Messenger |
Reuse this content | Reuse this content |