This article is from the source 'independent' and was first published or seen on . It last changed over 40 days ago and won't be checked again for changes.

You can find the current article at its original source at http://www.independent.co.uk/news/uk/home-news/baby-isaiah-latest-updates-parents-legal-life-support-machine-kings-college-hospital-london-brain-a8183601.html

The article has changed 3 times. There is an RSS feed of changes available.

Version 0 Version 1
Baby Isaiah: Parents of brain-damaged boy lose fight to keep him on life support Baby Isaiah: Parents of brain-damaged boy lose fight to keep him on life support
(about 2 hours later)
An 11-month old baby boy will have his life support switched off against the wishes of his parents, a judge has ruled. An 11-month old baby boy will have his life support switched off against the wishes of his parents, a judge has ruled. 
Isaiah Haastrup suffered “catastrophic” brain damage at birth, leaving him unable to move or breathe independently, the court heard.Isaiah Haastrup suffered “catastrophic” brain damage at birth, leaving him unable to move or breathe independently, the court heard.
His parents, Takesha Thomas and Lanre Haastrup, both 36, had wanted to keep him on life support, arguing he showed signs of being responsive. His parents, Takesha Thomas and Lanre Haastrup, both 36, had wanted to keep him on life support, arguing he showed signs of being responsive. 
But Mr Justice MacDonald sided with specialists at King’s College Hospital who said giving further intensive care treatment would be “futile, burdensome and not in his best interests”.But Mr Justice MacDonald sided with specialists at King’s College Hospital who said giving further intensive care treatment would be “futile, burdensome and not in his best interests”.
The judge announced his decision on Monday in Birmingham after analysing evidence at a trial in the Family Division of the High Court in London earlier this month.The judge announced his decision on Monday in Birmingham after analysing evidence at a trial in the Family Division of the High Court in London earlier this month.
Isaiah was in a low level of consciousness and did not respond to stimulation, doctors told the court. Isaiah was in a low level of consciousness and did not respond to stimulation, doctors told the court. 
But Isaiah’s mother Ms Thomas told the judge: “When I speak to him he will respond, slowly, by opening one eye.”But Isaiah’s mother Ms Thomas told the judge: “When I speak to him he will respond, slowly, by opening one eye.”
She added: “I see a child who is injured. He needs love. He needs care. I have it. I can give it.She added: “I see a child who is injured. He needs love. He needs care. I have it. I can give it.
“To say it is so poor, it is not worth living, that is not right. It is not their decision to make.”“To say it is so poor, it is not worth living, that is not right. It is not their decision to make.”
Mr Haastrup fought back tears at the trial as he outlined a series of complaints about the hospital to Mr Justice MacDonald. Mr Haastrup fought back tears at the trial as he outlined a series of complaints against the hospital to Mr Justice MacDonald.
He said the trust had “harmed” Isaiah at birth, told the judge that a “negligence case” was under way, after Isaiah was deprived of oxygen at birth.  He said the trust had “harmed” Isaiah at birth, told the judge that a “negligence case” was under way, after Isaiah was deprived of oxygen at birth.  
“There have been failings,” he said. “But for them Isaiah would be at home having a lovely meal with me, with his lovely mum, playing around.”“There have been failings,” he said. “But for them Isaiah would be at home having a lovely meal with me, with his lovely mum, playing around.”
Mr Haastrup said “everything” was “about full control” for hospital bosses and accused doctors of not taking account of his views or those of Miss Thomas.Mr Haastrup said “everything” was “about full control” for hospital bosses and accused doctors of not taking account of his views or those of Miss Thomas.
More follows...