This article is from the source 'bbc' and was first published or seen on . It last changed over 40 days ago and won't be checked again for changes.
You can find the current article at its original source at http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-42862904
The article has changed 11 times. There is an RSS feed of changes available.
Version 0 | Version 1 |
---|---|
Personal Independence payments: All 1.6 million claims to be reviewed | |
(35 minutes later) | |
Every person receiving Personal Independence Payments (PIP) will have their claim reviewed, the Department for Work and Pensions has said. | Every person receiving Personal Independence Payments (PIP) will have their claim reviewed, the Department for Work and Pensions has said. |
A total of 1.6 million of the main disability benefit claims will be reviewed, with around 220,000 people expected to receive more money. | |
It comes after the DWP decided not to challenge a court ruling that said changes to PIP were unfair to people with mental health conditions. | |
The review could cost £3.7bn by 2023. | The review could cost £3.7bn by 2023. |
The minister for disabled people, Sarah Newton, said the DWP was embarking on a "complex exercise and of considerable scale." | |
She added: "Whilst we will be working at pace to complete this exercise it is important that we get it right." | |
Ministers made changes to PIP in 2017 which limited the amount of support people with mental health conditions could receive. | |
As a result, people who were unable to travel independently on the grounds of psychological distress - as opposed to other conditions - were not entitled to the enhanced mobility rate of the benefit. | |
The government pressed ahead with the proposals, despite criticism from an independent tribunal in 2016. | |
But in December, a High Court judge ruled the alterations "blatantly discriminate" against people with psychiatric problems and were a breach of their human rights. | |
Last week, new Work and Pensions Secretary Esther McVey announced the government would not appeal against the judgement, despite not agreeing with certain aspects of it. |