This article is from the source 'nytimes' and was first published or seen on . It last changed over 40 days ago and won't be checked again for changes.

You can find the current article at its original source at https://www.nytimes.com/2018/01/31/nyregion/justice-department-moves-to-dismiss-corruption-case-against-menendez.html

The article has changed 5 times. There is an RSS feed of changes available.

Version 0 Version 1
Justice Department Moves to Dismiss Corruption Case Against Menendez Justice Department Moves to Dismiss Corruption Case Against Menendez
(35 minutes later)
The Department of Justice moved on Wednesday to dismiss the remaining charges against Senator Robert Menendez, just weeks after prosecutors announced their intent to retry him on federal corruption charges, a decision that would allow the New Jersey Democrat to avoid running for re-election while under indictment.The Department of Justice moved on Wednesday to dismiss the remaining charges against Senator Robert Menendez, just weeks after prosecutors announced their intent to retry him on federal corruption charges, a decision that would allow the New Jersey Democrat to avoid running for re-election while under indictment.
The motion to dismiss cites a decision last week by Judge William H. Walls to acquit Mr. Menendez of seven of the 18 charges he had faced, which included bribery charges stemming from accusations that he accepted political donations from a wealthy Florida eye doctor in exchange for lobbying on the doctor’s behalf. The doctor, Salomon Melgen, was also charged in the case.The motion to dismiss cites a decision last week by Judge William H. Walls to acquit Mr. Menendez of seven of the 18 charges he had faced, which included bribery charges stemming from accusations that he accepted political donations from a wealthy Florida eye doctor in exchange for lobbying on the doctor’s behalf. The doctor, Salomon Melgen, was also charged in the case.
The prosecutor’s request will be decided by Judge Jose L. Linares, the chief United States district judge in New Jersey, who has temporarily taken over after Judge Walls recused himself.The prosecutor’s request will be decided by Judge Jose L. Linares, the chief United States district judge in New Jersey, who has temporarily taken over after Judge Walls recused himself.
“Given the impact of the court’s Jan. 24 order on the charges and the evidence admissible in a retrial, the United States has determined that it will not retry the defendants on the remaining charges,” said Nicole Navas, a spokeswoman for the Justice Department.“Given the impact of the court’s Jan. 24 order on the charges and the evidence admissible in a retrial, the United States has determined that it will not retry the defendants on the remaining charges,” said Nicole Navas, a spokeswoman for the Justice Department.
The trial of Mr. Menendez and Dr. Melgen, who have been longtime friends, ended in a mistrial in November after a jury said it could not reach a verdict. One juror told reporters that the panel had been deadlocked 10-to-2. Mr. Menendez had been charged with using the power of his office to conduct favors for Dr. Melgen in exchange for lavish gifts, trips on a private plane and political contributions. The trial of Mr. Menendez and Dr. Melgen, who have been longtime friends, ended in a mistrial in November after a jury said it could not reach a verdict. One juror told reporters that the panel had been deadlocked 10 to 2 in favor of acquittal. Mr. Menendez had been charged with using the power of his office to conduct favors for Dr. Melgen in exchange for lavish gifts, trips on a private plane and political contributions.
Mr. Menendez had celebrated the mistrial as a vindication. After the trial, Mr. Menendez’s lawyers quickly filed a motion to dismiss the entire case, and Judge Walls’s decision to toss out some of the charges against Mr. Menendez appeared to leave federal prosecutors with a weak hand. Mr. Menendez had claimed he was vindicated after the mistrial even though he remained under indictment and was quick to celebrate Wednesday’s decision.
“From the very beginning, I never wavered in my innocence and my belief that justice would prevail,” he said in a statement. “I am grateful that the Department of Justice has taken the time to re-evaluate its case and come to the appropriate conclusion.”