This article is from the source 'guardian' and was first published or seen on . It last changed over 40 days ago and won't be checked again for changes.

You can find the current article at its original source at https://www.theguardian.com/environment/2018/jan/31/industrial-landscape-should-be-protected

The article has changed 6 times. There is an RSS feed of changes available.

Version 3 Version 4
Industrial landscape should be protected Industrial landscape should be protected
(5 days later)
LettersLetters
Wed 31 Jan 2018 18.05 GMTWed 31 Jan 2018 18.05 GMT
Last modified on Wed 31 Jan 2018 22.00 GMT Last modified on Wed 14 Feb 2018 17.36 GMT
Share on FacebookShare on Facebook
Share on TwitterShare on Twitter
Share via EmailShare via Email
View more sharing optionsView more sharing options
Share on LinkedInShare on LinkedIn
Share on PinterestShare on Pinterest
Share on Google+Share on Google+
Share on WhatsAppShare on WhatsApp
Share on MessengerShare on Messenger
CloseClose
We are in danger of losing a major feature of the late 20th-century industrial landscape (Gas under pressure: Solar plants squeeze power station firms, 30 January). I refer to the piecemeal removal of the 2000MW coal-fired power stations that have, since the 1960s dominated the flat landscapes of the Midlands and north of England. You feature the plant at West Burton. Located inland adjacent to the mines, the design of these necessitated the provision of massive cooling towers, their sculptural shapes visible on the horizon for many miles, complemented by the bulk of the turbine halls and boiler houses. Shouldn’t Historic England list at least one or two of them? Didcot and Ferrybridge are already lost. I suggest protecting Cottam in Nottinghamshire and Fiddler’s Ferry near Runcorn. Donal BoyleAghadowey, Northern IrelandWe are in danger of losing a major feature of the late 20th-century industrial landscape (Gas under pressure: Solar plants squeeze power station firms, 30 January). I refer to the piecemeal removal of the 2000MW coal-fired power stations that have, since the 1960s dominated the flat landscapes of the Midlands and north of England. You feature the plant at West Burton. Located inland adjacent to the mines, the design of these necessitated the provision of massive cooling towers, their sculptural shapes visible on the horizon for many miles, complemented by the bulk of the turbine halls and boiler houses. Shouldn’t Historic England list at least one or two of them? Didcot and Ferrybridge are already lost. I suggest protecting Cottam in Nottinghamshire and Fiddler’s Ferry near Runcorn. Donal BoyleAghadowey, Northern Ireland
• Ken Cronin (Letters, 17 January), of the UK onshore fossil fuel trade body, responds to your editorial on fracking (10 January) by claiming that imported natural gas has “higher [environmental] emissions” than the gas “beneath our feet”. This claim is akin to the 40-a-day smoker with lung cancer telling their doctor that only the last two or three cigarettes of the day do the damage, and promising to stick to 37 a day. There is a global gas glut. The UK is well supplied by imports from stable countries, the price of which is predicted to remain low and stable for years to come. So no additional bridging supply is needed while the 23m UK households that depend on gas are weaned off their fossil fuel addiction over the next one or two decades.• Ken Cronin (Letters, 17 January), of the UK onshore fossil fuel trade body, responds to your editorial on fracking (10 January) by claiming that imported natural gas has “higher [environmental] emissions” than the gas “beneath our feet”. This claim is akin to the 40-a-day smoker with lung cancer telling their doctor that only the last two or three cigarettes of the day do the damage, and promising to stick to 37 a day. There is a global gas glut. The UK is well supplied by imports from stable countries, the price of which is predicted to remain low and stable for years to come. So no additional bridging supply is needed while the 23m UK households that depend on gas are weaned off their fossil fuel addiction over the next one or two decades.
The UK shale basins are far more complex geologically than in the US, and a fully fledged drilling industry will need to be developed from scratch – Lancashire is not Texas. This will require several billion pounds of capital investment, the training of several thousand technicians and engineers, and will take at least a decade to create. UK shale gas will probably cost around double that of US gas. The Committee on Climate Change report only sanctioned shale gas development on condition, among others, that indigenous gas replaces imports and does not add to it. Mr Cronin should tell us whether he favours a tariff on gas imports, an import ban or else a subsidy, to make UK shale gas competitive.David SmytheEmeritus professor of geophysics, University of GlasgowThe UK shale basins are far more complex geologically than in the US, and a fully fledged drilling industry will need to be developed from scratch – Lancashire is not Texas. This will require several billion pounds of capital investment, the training of several thousand technicians and engineers, and will take at least a decade to create. UK shale gas will probably cost around double that of US gas. The Committee on Climate Change report only sanctioned shale gas development on condition, among others, that indigenous gas replaces imports and does not add to it. Mr Cronin should tell us whether he favours a tariff on gas imports, an import ban or else a subsidy, to make UK shale gas competitive.David SmytheEmeritus professor of geophysics, University of Glasgow
• Join the debate – email guardian.letters@theguardian.com• Join the debate – email guardian.letters@theguardian.com
• Read more Guardian letters – click here to visit gu.com/letters• Read more Guardian letters – click here to visit gu.com/letters
EnvironmentEnvironment
Fossil fuelsFossil fuels
FrackingFracking
Energy billsEnergy bills
Consumer affairsConsumer affairs
Household billsHousehold bills
lettersletters
Share on FacebookShare on Facebook
Share on TwitterShare on Twitter
Share via EmailShare via Email
Share on LinkedInShare on LinkedIn
Share on PinterestShare on Pinterest
Share on Google+Share on Google+
Share on WhatsAppShare on WhatsApp
Share on MessengerShare on Messenger
Reuse this contentReuse this content