This article is from the source 'guardian' and was first published or seen on . It last changed over 40 days ago and won't be checked again for changes.
You can find the current article at its original source at https://www.theguardian.com/politics/2018/feb/01/irish-court-refuses-mans-extradition-because-of-brexit
The article has changed 6 times. There is an RSS feed of changes available.
| Version 0 | Version 1 |
|---|---|
| Irish court refuses man's extradition because of Brexit | Irish court refuses man's extradition because of Brexit |
| (35 minutes later) | |
| Supreme court judges rule UK will have left EU by the end of the company director’s sentence | Supreme court judges rule UK will have left EU by the end of the company director’s sentence |
| Owen Bowcott | Owen Bowcott |
| Thu 1 Feb 2018 19.59 GMT | Thu 1 Feb 2018 19.59 GMT |
| Last modified on Thu 1 Feb 2018 20.32 GMT | |
| Share on Facebook | Share on Facebook |
| Share on Twitter | Share on Twitter |
| Share via Email | Share via Email |
| View more sharing options | View more sharing options |
| Share on LinkedIn | Share on LinkedIn |
| Share on Pinterest | Share on Pinterest |
| Share on Google+ | Share on Google+ |
| Share on WhatsApp | Share on WhatsApp |
| Share on Messenger | Share on Messenger |
| Close | Close |
| Ireland’s supreme court has declined to extradite a company director wanted for fraud to London because by the time he finishes his prison sentence the UK will have left the EU. | Ireland’s supreme court has declined to extradite a company director wanted for fraud to London because by the time he finishes his prison sentence the UK will have left the EU. |
| The judgment it issued revealed the man is one of about 20 people in a similar position resisting removal to Britain on identical legal grounds. | The judgment it issued revealed the man is one of about 20 people in a similar position resisting removal to Britain on identical legal grounds. |
| The surprise decision in Dublin is an early sign of the disruption Brexit may inflict on legal cooperation across the continent. A fresh extradition treaty between the two countries could be needed. | The surprise decision in Dublin is an early sign of the disruption Brexit may inflict on legal cooperation across the continent. A fresh extradition treaty between the two countries could be needed. |
| Thomas Joseph O’Connor, 51, a construction company director, from Roscommon, had been convicted of tax fraud in London in 2007 but then absconded on bail and fled to Ireland. | Thomas Joseph O’Connor, 51, a construction company director, from Roscommon, had been convicted of tax fraud in London in 2007 but then absconded on bail and fled to Ireland. |
| The UK authorities issued a European arrest warrant – the standard procedure that normally guarantees swift delivery within the EU – and O’Connor was arrested by Gardaí. | |
| The Irish supreme court, however, declined to extradite him to the UK and instead ruled that his case should be referred to the European Court of Justice (ECJ) in Luxembourg to resolve the issue. | The Irish supreme court, however, declined to extradite him to the UK and instead ruled that his case should be referred to the European Court of Justice (ECJ) in Luxembourg to resolve the issue. |
| If returned to the UK, the court noted, he would “continue to be imprisoned in the United Kingdom beyond 29 March, 2019, when the United Kingdom will withdraw from the European Union”. | If returned to the UK, the court noted, he would “continue to be imprisoned in the United Kingdom beyond 29 March, 2019, when the United Kingdom will withdraw from the European Union”. |
| Lawyers for O’Connor said that Ireland was being asked to surrender an EU citizen to a country where the EU charter of fundamental rights might no longer be capable of enforcement. | Lawyers for O’Connor said that Ireland was being asked to surrender an EU citizen to a country where the EU charter of fundamental rights might no longer be capable of enforcement. |
| “That the debate on potential consequences is not entirely theoretical can be seen from the question which was raised concerning the entitlement of Mr O’Connor to the benefit of a period spent in custody on foot of an earlier European arrest warrant which was found to be invalid,” the five-judge court ruled. | “That the debate on potential consequences is not entirely theoretical can be seen from the question which was raised concerning the entitlement of Mr O’Connor to the benefit of a period spent in custody on foot of an earlier European arrest warrant which was found to be invalid,” the five-judge court ruled. |
| The supreme court concluded that the issue should be passed on to the ECJ – the court whose jurisdiction Brexiters are determined to leave as soon as possible. | |
| “The point is novel and is not the subject of any jurisprudence of the Court of Justice,” the Irish judges said. “However, that is hardly surprising since there has never been a case before of a country leaving the European Union.” | “The point is novel and is not the subject of any jurisprudence of the Court of Justice,” the Irish judges said. “However, that is hardly surprising since there has never been a case before of a country leaving the European Union.” |
| The Irish government had opposed referring the case to Luxembourg. | The Irish government had opposed referring the case to Luxembourg. |
| Brexit | Brexit |
| Article 50 | Article 50 |
| European Union | European Union |
| Europe | Europe |
| Ireland | |
| Court of justice of the European Union | |
| news | |
| Share on Facebook | Share on Facebook |
| Share on Twitter | Share on Twitter |
| Share via Email | Share via Email |
| Share on LinkedIn | Share on LinkedIn |
| Share on Pinterest | Share on Pinterest |
| Share on Google+ | Share on Google+ |
| Share on WhatsApp | Share on WhatsApp |
| Share on Messenger | Share on Messenger |
| Reuse this content | Reuse this content |