This article is from the source 'guardian' and was first published or seen on . It last changed over 40 days ago and won't be checked again for changes.
You can find the current article at its original source at https://www.theguardian.com/education/2018/feb/02/ofsted-must-defend-creative-subjects
The article has changed 5 times. There is an RSS feed of changes available.
| Version 0 | Version 1 |
|---|---|
| Ofsted must defend creative subjects | Ofsted must defend creative subjects |
| (about 5 hours later) | |
| Letters | Letters |
| Fri 2 Feb 2018 16.53 GMT | Fri 2 Feb 2018 16.53 GMT |
| Last modified on Fri 2 Feb 2018 22.00 GMT | |
| Share on Facebook | Share on Facebook |
| Share on Twitter | Share on Twitter |
| Share via Email | Share via Email |
| View more sharing options | View more sharing options |
| Share on LinkedIn | Share on LinkedIn |
| Share on Pinterest | Share on Pinterest |
| Share on Google+ | Share on Google+ |
| Share on WhatsApp | Share on WhatsApp |
| Share on Messenger | Share on Messenger |
| Close | Close |
| The news that one in 10 schools rely on voluntary donations by parents to run music and art classes is deeply troubling and sadly unsurprising (School’s creative subjects taught me the art of living, 1 February). Last month, a headteacher from Bingley Grammar school defended charging parents an extra £5 for preparing students for their music GCSE. Arts subjects develop verbal intelligence, creativity, self-expression and collaboration skills – all vital to further education and employment, even in industries you’d associate with number-crunching. Many from the finance sector, for instance, have recently come forward about its need for more creative thinkers. With the social and individual rewards of the arts being so high, it is baffling that Ofsted chief Amanda Spielman insists academic subjects are the best route to higher level study. By dismissing the value of the arts in schools we risk stunting the creative capacities of the next generation.Louise MitchellCEO, Bristol Music Trust, Colston Hall, Bristol | The news that one in 10 schools rely on voluntary donations by parents to run music and art classes is deeply troubling and sadly unsurprising (School’s creative subjects taught me the art of living, 1 February). Last month, a headteacher from Bingley Grammar school defended charging parents an extra £5 for preparing students for their music GCSE. Arts subjects develop verbal intelligence, creativity, self-expression and collaboration skills – all vital to further education and employment, even in industries you’d associate with number-crunching. Many from the finance sector, for instance, have recently come forward about its need for more creative thinkers. With the social and individual rewards of the arts being so high, it is baffling that Ofsted chief Amanda Spielman insists academic subjects are the best route to higher level study. By dismissing the value of the arts in schools we risk stunting the creative capacities of the next generation.Louise MitchellCEO, Bristol Music Trust, Colston Hall, Bristol |
| • Join the debate – email guardian.letters@theguardian.com | • Join the debate – email guardian.letters@theguardian.com |
| • Read more Guardian letters – click here to visit gu.com/letters | • Read more Guardian letters – click here to visit gu.com/letters |
| Music | Music |
| Art | Art |
| (Education) | (Education) |
| Art | Art |
| (Art and design) | (Art and design) |
| Schools | Schools |
| Ofsted | Ofsted |
| letters | letters |
| Share on Facebook | Share on Facebook |
| Share on Twitter | Share on Twitter |
| Share via Email | Share via Email |
| Share on LinkedIn | Share on LinkedIn |
| Share on Pinterest | Share on Pinterest |
| Share on Google+ | Share on Google+ |
| Share on WhatsApp | Share on WhatsApp |
| Share on Messenger | Share on Messenger |
| Reuse this content | Reuse this content |