This article is from the source 'guardian' and was first published or seen on . It last changed over 40 days ago and won't be checked again for changes.

You can find the current article at its original source at http://www.theguardian.com/world/2018/feb/05/dutch-divided-over-law-against-insulting-the-king

The article has changed 6 times. There is an RSS feed of changes available.

Version 0 Version 1
Dutch divided over law against insulting the king Dutch divided over law against insulting the king
(about 3 hours later)
Government in the Netherlands split over attempts to scrap its lèse-majesté lawGovernment in the Netherlands split over attempts to scrap its lèse-majesté law
Daniel Boffey in BrusselsDaniel Boffey in Brussels
Mon 5 Feb 2018 11.05 GMTMon 5 Feb 2018 11.05 GMT
Last modified on Mon 5 Feb 2018 11.16 GMT Last modified on Mon 5 Feb 2018 13.48 GMT
Share on FacebookShare on Facebook
Share on TwitterShare on Twitter
Share via EmailShare via Email
View more sharing optionsView more sharing options
Share on LinkedInShare on LinkedIn
Share on PinterestShare on Pinterest
Share on Google+Share on Google+
Share on WhatsAppShare on WhatsApp
Share on MessengerShare on Messenger
CloseClose
It may be one of Europe’s most liberal states, but in the Netherlands reverence for the monarchy appears hard to kick.It may be one of Europe’s most liberal states, but in the Netherlands reverence for the monarchy appears hard to kick.
A divide has emerged in the Dutch coalition government over an attempt by one of the ruling parties to scrap a law that makes insulting King Willem-Alexander a crime punishable by up to five years in prison.A divide has emerged in the Dutch coalition government over an attempt by one of the ruling parties to scrap a law that makes insulting King Willem-Alexander a crime punishable by up to five years in prison.
The Netherlands is one of the few European countries to retain a law of lèse-majesté, from the Latin laesa maiestatis, meaning injury to the majesty. The last case in the Netherlands was brought in 2016.The Netherlands is one of the few European countries to retain a law of lèse-majesté, from the Latin laesa maiestatis, meaning injury to the majesty. The last case in the Netherlands was brought in 2016.
The Dutch house of representatives is due to debate the issue this week, but differences within the governing coalition have already become evident.The Dutch house of representatives is due to debate the issue this week, but differences within the governing coalition have already become evident.
While the Greens, socialists and Labour party are backing the initiative by the liberals in the D66 party, they are facing opposition from the Christian parties in government – the CDA and the more conservative Christian Union.While the Greens, socialists and Labour party are backing the initiative by the liberals in the D66 party, they are facing opposition from the Christian parties in government – the CDA and the more conservative Christian Union.
Chris van Dam, an MP in the CDA, told the Dutch daily newspaper De Telegraaf: “We are talking about the king, our king who cannot defend himself in the public debate.”Chris van Dam, an MP in the CDA, told the Dutch daily newspaper De Telegraaf: “We are talking about the king, our king who cannot defend himself in the public debate.”
Under the proposals from D66, Willem-Alexander would still be protected by laws designed to stop speech liable to incite discrimination or hatred.Under the proposals from D66, Willem-Alexander would still be protected by laws designed to stop speech liable to incite discrimination or hatred.
While sympathetic to the change, the centre-right liberal party, the VVD, led by the Dutch prime minister, Mark Rutte, has said it would not support a law that would force the king to file a formal complaint to get justice.While sympathetic to the change, the centre-right liberal party, the VVD, led by the Dutch prime minister, Mark Rutte, has said it would not support a law that would force the king to file a formal complaint to get justice.
Sven Koopmans, an MP, said: “If the king himself has to file a report, we are not there for it ... The king should not have to go to the police station on his bike for a declaration.”Sven Koopmans, an MP, said: “If the king himself has to file a report, we are not there for it ... The king should not have to go to the police station on his bike for a declaration.”
It has been suggested the parties are intending to use the issue to distinguish themselves before municipal elections in March.It has been suggested the parties are intending to use the issue to distinguish themselves before municipal elections in March.
Two years ago, a 44-year-old man was sentenced to 30 days in prison having “intentionally insulted” the monarch on Facebook, accusing him of being a murderer, thief and rapist.Two years ago, a 44-year-old man was sentenced to 30 days in prison having “intentionally insulted” the monarch on Facebook, accusing him of being a murderer, thief and rapist.
He doctored images of executions online to include the king’s face in place of those of the actual victims.He doctored images of executions online to include the king’s face in place of those of the actual victims.
A court in Overijssel, an eastern provence bordering Germany, had said in a statement: “This behaviour is unacceptable in our society and demands that a penalty be imposed on the suspect.”A court in Overijssel, an eastern provence bordering Germany, had said in a statement: “This behaviour is unacceptable in our society and demands that a penalty be imposed on the suspect.”
In 2014, prosecutors also charged an activist who had shouted obscene slogans about the royal family during a protest, only to reverse their decision after the move was condemned as an attack on free speech.In 2014, prosecutors also charged an activist who had shouted obscene slogans about the royal family during a protest, only to reverse their decision after the move was condemned as an attack on free speech.
The proposed changes would also abolish a law that prohibits anyone insulting the head of a friendly state. There has been more support for this move after Turkey’s president, Recep Tayyip Erdoğan, sought the prosecution of a German comedian over a satirical poem. The offence carries a sentence of up to two years in a Dutch prison.The proposed changes would also abolish a law that prohibits anyone insulting the head of a friendly state. There has been more support for this move after Turkey’s president, Recep Tayyip Erdoğan, sought the prosecution of a German comedian over a satirical poem. The offence carries a sentence of up to two years in a Dutch prison.
NetherlandsNetherlands
EuropeEurope
newsnews
Share on FacebookShare on Facebook
Share on TwitterShare on Twitter
Share via EmailShare via Email
Share on LinkedInShare on LinkedIn
Share on PinterestShare on Pinterest
Share on Google+Share on Google+
Share on WhatsAppShare on WhatsApp
Share on MessengerShare on Messenger
Reuse this contentReuse this content