This article is from the source 'guardian' and was first published or seen on . It last changed over 40 days ago and won't be checked again for changes.
You can find the current article at its original source at https://www.theguardian.com/society/2018/feb/05/disability-equality-on-juries-a-sham
The article has changed 5 times. There is an RSS feed of changes available.
| Version 3 | Version 4 |
|---|---|
| Disability equality on juries a sham | Disability equality on juries a sham |
| (11 days later) | |
| Living with a sight impairment, I know that I’m more likely to be the victim of crime than my fully sighted counterparts, less likely to get legal redress, and this week I discovered that my right to serve as a juror is a sham. It is apparently beyond the wit of either the jury summoning office or one of the most important courts outside London to take note of what is needed to serve successfully as a juror if you can’t see, and therefore to ensure a robust, inclusive or truly representative jury system. I made repeated requests for accessible formats, only to be ignored. When I arrived at court they pleaded ignorance of my sight impairment. Publicly and repeatedly, I had to explain myself. I had to endure the public humiliation of passing notes to the judge to say I couldn’t read the evidence before being dismissed as a juror. My personal business played out as a public shambles in front of everyone from the dock to the press gallery. In discharging me, the judge assured me that she had complained about my treatment. But without the weight of the law neither she nor I have the power to ensure I am treated reasonably. Only parliament can do that, but it does not. Twenty years after disability equalities legislation, the justice system remains exempt to this important principle.Anna TylorChair, Greater London Fund for the Blind | Living with a sight impairment, I know that I’m more likely to be the victim of crime than my fully sighted counterparts, less likely to get legal redress, and this week I discovered that my right to serve as a juror is a sham. It is apparently beyond the wit of either the jury summoning office or one of the most important courts outside London to take note of what is needed to serve successfully as a juror if you can’t see, and therefore to ensure a robust, inclusive or truly representative jury system. I made repeated requests for accessible formats, only to be ignored. When I arrived at court they pleaded ignorance of my sight impairment. Publicly and repeatedly, I had to explain myself. I had to endure the public humiliation of passing notes to the judge to say I couldn’t read the evidence before being dismissed as a juror. My personal business played out as a public shambles in front of everyone from the dock to the press gallery. In discharging me, the judge assured me that she had complained about my treatment. But without the weight of the law neither she nor I have the power to ensure I am treated reasonably. Only parliament can do that, but it does not. Twenty years after disability equalities legislation, the justice system remains exempt to this important principle.Anna TylorChair, Greater London Fund for the Blind |
| • Join the debate – email guardian.letters@theguardian.com | • Join the debate – email guardian.letters@theguardian.com |
| • Read more Guardian letters – click here to visit gu.com/letters | • Read more Guardian letters – click here to visit gu.com/letters |
| Blindness and visual impairment | Blindness and visual impairment |
| Disability | Disability |
| Health | Health |
| Crime | Crime |
| letters | letters |
| Share on Facebook | Share on Facebook |
| Share on Twitter | Share on Twitter |
| Share via Email | Share via Email |
| Share on LinkedIn | Share on LinkedIn |
| Share on Pinterest | Share on Pinterest |
| Share on Google+ | Share on Google+ |
| Share on WhatsApp | Share on WhatsApp |
| Share on Messenger | Share on Messenger |
| Reuse this content | Reuse this content |