This article is from the source 'nytimes' and was first published or seen on . It last changed over 40 days ago and won't be checked again for changes.

You can find the current article at its original source at https://www.nytimes.com/2018/02/08/world/middleeast/syria-us-assad.html

The article has changed 5 times. There is an RSS feed of changes available.

Version 0 Version 1
U.S.-Backed Coalition in Syria Strikes Pro-Assad Forces U.S.-Backed Coalition in Syria Strikes Pro-Assad Forces
(about 3 hours later)
The American-backed coalition in Syria has repelled an attack by forces supporting the Assad government, carrying out deadly strikes Wednesday night, in a rare confrontation between competing factions that have both fought the Islamic State. BEIRUT — The American-backed coalition in Syria said it repelled an attack by forces supporting the Assad government, carrying out deadly strikes Wednesday night, in a rare confrontation between competing factions that have both fought the Islamic State.
“Syrian pro-regime forces initiated an unprovoked attack against well-established Syrian Democratic Forces,” the United States military’s Central Command said in a statement. The S.D.F., a mix of Kurdish, Arab and other fighters, is allied with the international coalition, including the United States, and Central Command said that coalition troops were with the S.D.F. forces at the time of the attack. The clash occurred in an area of eastern Syria where government troops and their allies have competed with the Kurdish-led Syrian Democratic Forces, allied with the United States, to seize territory rich in oil and natural gas.
The fighting offered a glaring example of the new risks posed by a host of combatants in the region, including Iran, Russia, Syria, Turkey and the United States, who, though wary of one another, had a shared interest in defeating the Islamic State. Now that the militant group has been driven from most of its territory, the conflicting interests are leading to increasing friction and unpredictable escalations, like Turkey’s recent assault on a Kurdish-controlled region.
The United States military’s Central Command said on Thursday that “Syrian pro-regime forces initiated an unprovoked attack against well-established Syrian Democratic Forces.” It said that at the time of the clash, international coalition troops were with the S.D.F., a mix of Kurdish, Arab and other fighters, but it did not say whether any were American.
“In defense of coalition and partner forces, the coalition conducted strikes,” it said.“In defense of coalition and partner forces, the coalition conducted strikes,” it said.
The Syrian state news agency, Sana, described the strikes as aggression by the coalition against “popular forces that were fighting Daesh,” a term for the Islamic State. It said they had left “scores of persons dead and others injured.” The Syrian state news agency, Sana, described the strikes as aggression by the coalition against “popular forces that were fighting” the Islamic State. It said they had left “scores of persons dead and others injured.”
It was not clear whether those killed were the forces of the Syrian president, Bashar al-Assad, or of his allies. It was not clear whether the casualties were the forces of the Syrian president, Bashar al-Assad, or of his allies, which include Russia and Iran-backed militias like the Lebanon-based militant group Hezbollah. Middle East experts said that direct fighting between Americans and Russians would represent a dangerous escalation in the Syrian fighting.
The clash occurred in Deir al-Zour Province in eastern Syria, between the Euphrates and the Iraqi border. Syrian government forces in the area and their allies, including Russia, have competed with the S.D.F. to seize territory rich in oil and natural gas that had been controlled by retreating Islamic State militants. Central Command said the pro-government forces had attacked about five miles past “the agreed-upon Euphrates River de-confliction line.” Kremlin officials said that no Russians had been involved. In a statement, Russia’s Defense Ministry said that the coalition strike was carried out by helicopters, and that it had wounded 25 Syrian insurgents.
Aaron David Miller, a Middle East analyst at the Wilson Center, said the crucial question was whether the pro-government advance and the sharp response were isolated instances, or the beginning of “a new phase” in the Syrian war. Such a shift would put the United States and its allies in more direct confrontation not only with Mr. Assad, but also with Russia. Also among Mr. Assad’s allies are Iranian-backed militias, including the Lebanon-based militant group Hezbollah. The Defense Ministry charged that the American aim in Syria was “capture and retention of economic assets.” The Foreign Ministry said that the American presence was giving shelter to Islamic State fighters.
Farther west in Syria, Americans are also in a standoff with Turkey, a NATO ally, which is fighting Kurdish-led forces. Aaron David Miller, a Middle East analyst at the Wilson Center, said the forces backing the Syrian government seemed to be testing the coalition’s resolve. But, he added, it was not clear whether the clash marked a new phase of the war in which the United States and its allies would enter more direct confrontation with forces loyal to Mr. Assad.
“We’re now protecting a territory the size of Indiana and deepening our commitment to the S.D.F., with no sense of where this is going, no sense of strategy, no sense of endgame,” said Mr. Miller, who was a State Department official in Republican and Democratic administrations.
The fighting took place Deir al-Zour Province in eastern Syria, between the Euphrates and the Iraqi border. Central Command said the pro-Assad forces had attacked about five miles east of “the agreed-upon Euphrates River de-confliction line.”
The area has developed into a potential flash point, with the S.D.F. and international coalition holding most of the territory northeast of the river — including a significant portion of Syria’s oil production — and the pro-Assad alliance holding most of the land to the southwest.
Tensions heightened recently when the United States announced that it would help to stabilize the S.D.F.-controlled areas, ensure that the Islamic State could not make a comeback, and deter expanding Iranian influence. That angered enemies and allies alike, with the Turks accusing the United States of cementing a Kurdish autonomous zone — as well as de facto Kurdish control over adjacent majority-Arab areas.
Turkey then invaded Afrin, an area farther west that is controlled by another Kurdish group, the Y.P.G., which Ankara considers a terrorist threat. The United States did not intervene, but Turkey has threatened to attack S.D.F. forces in the eastern town of Manbij, where American advisers are present.
American military officials warned on Wednesday that they would defend the area, creating a tense standoff with a NATO ally.