This article is from the source 'guardian' and was first published or seen on . It last changed over 40 days ago and won't be checked again for changes.
You can find the current article at its original source at https://www.theguardian.com/uk-news/2018/feb/08/far-right-propaganda-and-the-finsbury-park-attack
The article has changed 3 times. There is an RSS feed of changes available.
| Version 0 | Version 1 |
|---|---|
| Far-right propaganda and the Finsbury Park attack | Far-right propaganda and the Finsbury Park attack |
| (1 day later) | |
| Letters | |
| Thu 8 Feb 2018 17.52 GMT | |
| Last modified on Thu 8 Feb 2018 22.00 GMT | |
| Share on Facebook | |
| Share on Twitter | |
| Share via Email | |
| View more sharing options | |
| Share on LinkedIn | |
| Share on Pinterest | |
| Share on Google+ | |
| Share on WhatsApp | |
| Share on Messenger | |
| Close | |
| Darren Osborne is a disturbed, violent man with a history of crime, and was convicted of murder, not a terrorist offence. For the judge to describe him as having been radicalised, in middle age, “over the space of a month or so” (Report, 3 February) may be correct in a narrow sense of the word. Osborne appears to have been vulnerable to online propaganda. However, could it be that this was simply the convenient vehicle, or excuse, for an urge towards violence? Seeking an external justification for such antisocial urges isn’t unknown. Maybe we should be wary of overinflating the profile and influence of the far right, and feeding the online extremist propaganda machine, by ascribing a considered motive to a man who was looking for a cause that would allow him to justify to himself, and others, his violent antisocial feelings?Deborah HendersonOxford | Darren Osborne is a disturbed, violent man with a history of crime, and was convicted of murder, not a terrorist offence. For the judge to describe him as having been radicalised, in middle age, “over the space of a month or so” (Report, 3 February) may be correct in a narrow sense of the word. Osborne appears to have been vulnerable to online propaganda. However, could it be that this was simply the convenient vehicle, or excuse, for an urge towards violence? Seeking an external justification for such antisocial urges isn’t unknown. Maybe we should be wary of overinflating the profile and influence of the far right, and feeding the online extremist propaganda machine, by ascribing a considered motive to a man who was looking for a cause that would allow him to justify to himself, and others, his violent antisocial feelings?Deborah HendersonOxford |
| • Join the debate – email guardian.letters@theguardian.com | • Join the debate – email guardian.letters@theguardian.com |
| • Read more Guardian letters – click here to visit gu.com/letters | • Read more Guardian letters – click here to visit gu.com/letters |
| Finsbury Park van attack | |
| Crime | |
| The far right | |
| UK security and counter-terrorism | |
| London | |
| letters | |
| Share on Facebook | |
| Share on Twitter | |
| Share via Email | |
| Share on LinkedIn | |
| Share on Pinterest | |
| Share on Google+ | |
| Share on WhatsApp | |
| Share on Messenger | |
| Reuse this content |