This article is from the source 'guardian' and was first published or seen on . It last changed over 40 days ago and won't be checked again for changes.

You can find the current article at its original source at https://www.theguardian.com/education/2018/feb/18/tuition-fees-mays-overhaul-is-clear-simple-and-wrong-answer

The article has changed 3 times. There is an RSS feed of changes available.

Version 0 Version 1
Tuition fees: May's overhaul is 'clear, simple and wrong' answer Tuition fees: May's overhaul is 'clear, simple and wrong' answer
(about 11 hours later)
Charging variable fees will not solve the problem of making university more affordableCharging variable fees will not solve the problem of making university more affordable
Richard Adams Education editorRichard Adams Education editor
Sun 18 Feb 2018 22.31 GMTSun 18 Feb 2018 22.31 GMT
Last modified on Sun 18 Feb 2018 22.35 GMT Last modified on Mon 19 Feb 2018 08.37 GMT
Share on FacebookShare on Facebook
Share on TwitterShare on Twitter
Share via EmailShare via Email
View more sharing optionsView more sharing options
Share on LinkedInShare on LinkedIn
Share on PinterestShare on Pinterest
Share on Google+Share on Google+
Share on WhatsAppShare on WhatsApp
Share on MessengerShare on Messenger
CloseClose
There’s a saying that for every complex problem there is an answer that is clear, simple and wrong. On tuition fees and student debt in England, both Theresa May and her new education secretary, Damian Hinds, are going for the “clear, simple and wrong” option.May’s intuition is: why should students at Oxbridge and a former polytech have to pay the same £9,250 a year to study as undergraduates?Why should someone taking an English course pay the same as someone doing engineering, when the complete works of Shakespeare are a fraction of the cost of a laser cutter? And why should someone who goes on to earn bucketloads in the City pay the same as a nurse or teacher?There’s a saying that for every complex problem there is an answer that is clear, simple and wrong. On tuition fees and student debt in England, both Theresa May and her new education secretary, Damian Hinds, are going for the “clear, simple and wrong” option.May’s intuition is: why should students at Oxbridge and a former polytech have to pay the same £9,250 a year to study as undergraduates?Why should someone taking an English course pay the same as someone doing engineering, when the complete works of Shakespeare are a fraction of the cost of a laser cutter? And why should someone who goes on to earn bucketloads in the City pay the same as a nurse or teacher?
The obvious answer would be to charge variable fees, but those who study the issue for at least 10 seconds quickly realise that all those cases contradict each other.It is true that different university courses cost different amounts. That’s why the government subsidises the more valuable ones, such as medicine and engineering, so that the uniform £9,250 fee is maintained.An English degree might be cheaper to teach than physics, but an English course at a Russell Group university is going to cost much the same as at any other university. And yet, we know that graduates from Oxford or Cambridge and graduates from newer universities tend to earn different amounts.Ironically, the highest-earning undergraduate courses in the country are among the cheapest to run: economics degrees at Birkbeck College and the London School of Economics. It’s partly because they attract qualified students, but also because both colleges are located right next to the UK’s most lucrative employers in the City of London.The obvious answer would be to charge variable fees, but those who study the issue for at least 10 seconds quickly realise that all those cases contradict each other.It is true that different university courses cost different amounts. That’s why the government subsidises the more valuable ones, such as medicine and engineering, so that the uniform £9,250 fee is maintained.An English degree might be cheaper to teach than physics, but an English course at a Russell Group university is going to cost much the same as at any other university. And yet, we know that graduates from Oxford or Cambridge and graduates from newer universities tend to earn different amounts.Ironically, the highest-earning undergraduate courses in the country are among the cheapest to run: economics degrees at Birkbeck College and the London School of Economics. It’s partly because they attract qualified students, but also because both colleges are located right next to the UK’s most lucrative employers in the City of London.
Under the current loans system, those well-paid graduates will pay back far more of their student loans than the mythical graduate hairdressers. So they do end up paying variable fees.We don’t know what Theresa May’s review will come up with yet, but forcing down tuition fees by itself will not solve the problem of making university more affordable. Tuition fees account for less than half of many students’ debts – so cutting them still leaves a lot owing.Under the current loans system, those well-paid graduates will pay back far more of their student loans than the mythical graduate hairdressers. So they do end up paying variable fees.We don’t know what Theresa May’s review will come up with yet, but forcing down tuition fees by itself will not solve the problem of making university more affordable. Tuition fees account for less than half of many students’ debts – so cutting them still leaves a lot owing.
Higher educationHigher education
Tuition feesTuition fees
Theresa MayTheresa May
Damian HindsDamian Hinds
analysisanalysis
Share on FacebookShare on Facebook
Share on TwitterShare on Twitter
Share via EmailShare via Email
Share on LinkedInShare on LinkedIn
Share on PinterestShare on Pinterest
Share on Google+Share on Google+
Share on WhatsAppShare on WhatsApp
Share on MessengerShare on Messenger
Reuse this contentReuse this content