This article is from the source 'bbc' and was first published or seen on . It last changed over 40 days ago and won't be checked again for changes.

You can find the current article at its original source at http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-england-bristol-43153529

The article has changed 4 times. There is an RSS feed of changes available.

Version 2 Version 3
Bristol FGM case against taxi driver father dropped Bristol FGM case against father dropped
(about 4 hours later)
A father accused of allowing his six-year-old daughter to undergo female genital mutilation (FGM) has been acquitted.A father accused of allowing his six-year-old daughter to undergo female genital mutilation (FGM) has been acquitted.
The 29-year-old taxi driver from Bristol is alleged to have confessed to a passenger that he had allowed her to be cut, saying it was a "tradition". The 29-year-old, who at one point drove a private hire vehicle, is alleged to have confessed to a passenger that he had allowed her to be cut.
However, Judge Julian Lambert described the medical evidence as "wholly inconclusive at its highest".However, Judge Julian Lambert described the medical evidence as "wholly inconclusive at its highest".
He instructed jurors at Bristol Crown Court to find the defendant not guilty.He instructed jurors at Bristol Crown Court to find the defendant not guilty.
'Taxi journey' The man from Bristol, who cannot be identified in order to protect the child's identity, had been charged with cruelty on a child under the age of 16 - which he had denied.
The man, who cannot be identified in order to protect the child's identity, had been charged with cruelty on a child under the age of 16 - which he had denied.
It was the crown's case an injury to the girl's genitalia was FGM.It was the crown's case an injury to the girl's genitalia was FGM.
The court was told the case relied "largely, if not entirely upon, on an alleged admission made in a taxi journey".The court was told the case relied "largely, if not entirely upon, on an alleged admission made in a taxi journey".
"There is no evidence put by the prosecution as to when or how any alleged mutilation is said to have taken place," Judge Lambert told the court."There is no evidence put by the prosecution as to when or how any alleged mutilation is said to have taken place," Judge Lambert told the court.
He described the prosecution case against the man, who is originally from Somalia, as "deeply troubling".He described the prosecution case against the man, who is originally from Somalia, as "deeply troubling".
'Inconsistent''Inconsistent'
He also said the account of the key witness - an anti-FGM campaigner - was "inconsistent".He also said the account of the key witness - an anti-FGM campaigner - was "inconsistent".
"X [the girl] has always denied she had any form of mutilation. The defendant says no such thing took place."X [the girl] has always denied she had any form of mutilation. The defendant says no such thing took place.
"The jury cannot convict the defendant of this offence unless they are sure that [the father] knowingly exposed X.""The jury cannot convict the defendant of this offence unless they are sure that [the father] knowingly exposed X."
Previously the jury had heard how a medical examination of the girl revealed a small lesion - "a couple of millimetres at most" - on her genitalia.Previously the jury had heard how a medical examination of the girl revealed a small lesion - "a couple of millimetres at most" - on her genitalia.
However, two doctors questioned said they could not confirm FGM had taken place.However, two doctors questioned said they could not confirm FGM had taken place.
"We respect the judge's decision and will not be appealing," a spokesperson for the Crown Prosecution Service said."We respect the judge's decision and will not be appealing," a spokesperson for the Crown Prosecution Service said.
The practice of FGM has been illegal in the UK since 1985.The practice of FGM has been illegal in the UK since 1985.