This article is from the source 'bbc' and was first published or seen on . It last changed over 40 days ago and won't be checked again for changes.

You can find the current article at its original source at http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-england-lincolnshire-43171049

The article has changed 5 times. There is an RSS feed of changes available.

Version 0 Version 1
Red Arrows death: Ejection seat firm fined £1.1m Red Arrows death: Ejection seat firm fined £1.1m
(35 minutes later)
An ejection seat manufacturer prosecuted over the death of a Red Arrows pilot thrown from his jet has been fined £1.1m.An ejection seat manufacturer prosecuted over the death of a Red Arrows pilot thrown from his jet has been fined £1.1m.
Flt Lt Sean Cunningham, 35, was ejected while conducting pre-flight safety checks at RAF Scampton in 2011.Flt Lt Sean Cunningham, 35, was ejected while conducting pre-flight safety checks at RAF Scampton in 2011.
The parachute on the seat did not then deploy and the airman was fatally injured, Lincoln Crown Court heard. The parachute on the seat did not then deploy and the airman was fatally injured.
Sentencing Martin-Baker Aircraft Ltd, Mrs Justice Carr said it was "an entirely preventable tragedy". Martin-Baker Aircraft Ltd previously admitted to breaching safety laws at Lincoln Crown Court.
The Middlesex-based company previously admitted to breaching safety laws. Sentencing the company, Mrs Justice Carr said it was "an entirely preventable tragedy".
The court previously heard an assessment by the Ministry of Defence (MoD) was that such an incident would happen only once in more than 100 years.The court previously heard an assessment by the Ministry of Defence (MoD) was that such an incident would happen only once in more than 100 years.
It was also told the firm had a "good system" in place and it "just failed in this instance".It was also told the firm had a "good system" in place and it "just failed in this instance".
However, the judge said: "A significant number of pilots, and also potential passengers, were exposed to the risk of harm over a lengthy period."However, the judge said: "A significant number of pilots, and also potential passengers, were exposed to the risk of harm over a lengthy period."
"Here the risk of harm was of the highest level - death. This was, in the words of his father, an entirely preventable tragedy.""Here the risk of harm was of the highest level - death. This was, in the words of his father, an entirely preventable tragedy."
Martin-Baker Aircraft Company fell short of the appropriate standard, she added. At a previous hearing, prosecutor Rex Tedd QC said there was a risk "to many pilots over a lengthy period".
"If the pilot was ejected from the Hawk aircraft, two shackles would not release from one another and would jam together and the main parachute would not deploy," he added.
"The pilot would be several hundred feet in the air and there could only be one result of that, and that is the pilot's death."
Mr Tedd also told the court: "Sean's two biggest fears in life were being ejected from an aircraft, and the injuries that he would sustain, and dying at a young age. Horrifically he experienced both."
Martin-Baker Aircraft Ltd had already agreed to pay #550,000 in prosecution costs.
The company fell short of the appropriate standard, the judge added.
Timeline of events: