This article is from the source 'guardian' and was first published or seen on . It last changed over 40 days ago and won't be checked again for changes.

You can find the current article at its original source at https://www.theguardian.com/uk-news/2018/mar/15/grenfell-tower-door-resisted-fire-half-as-long-as-it-was-meant-to

The article has changed 7 times. There is an RSS feed of changes available.

Version 2 Version 3
Grenfell Tower door resisted fire 'half as long' as it was meant to Grenfell Tower door resisted fire 'half as long' as it was meant to
(about 1 hour later)
Detectives investigating the Grenfell Tower blaze have revealed the front door to one of the flats failed fire tests.Detectives investigating the Grenfell Tower blaze have revealed the front door to one of the flats failed fire tests.
The door was on a lower floor where the fire had not gutted the building where 71 people lost their lives in the 14 June disaster. Following recent tests it emerged that it could only withstand fire for 15 minutes when it was meant to withstand 30 minutes.The door was on a lower floor where the fire had not gutted the building where 71 people lost their lives in the 14 June disaster. Following recent tests it emerged that it could only withstand fire for 15 minutes when it was meant to withstand 30 minutes.
The housing secretary, Sajid Javid, has been informed of the news and is expected to make a statement to the House of Commons on Thursday. The public inquiry into the fire, led by the retired judge Sir Martin Moore-Bick, resumes next week.The housing secretary, Sajid Javid, has been informed of the news and is expected to make a statement to the House of Commons on Thursday. The public inquiry into the fire, led by the retired judge Sir Martin Moore-Bick, resumes next week.
Scotland Yard wrote to families affected by the fire on Wednesday to inform them of the development. The Metropolitan police letter said: “Independent experts have advised that the risk to public safety is low, and that evidence from the suspected issue does not change that assessment.”Scotland Yard wrote to families affected by the fire on Wednesday to inform them of the development. The Metropolitan police letter said: “Independent experts have advised that the risk to public safety is low, and that evidence from the suspected issue does not change that assessment.”
Officials said the door manufacturer was Mastador and the type was called “Manse”, but it is not clear whether other doors in the building were of the same type. Government officials said further investigations were needed to establish if the heat in the rest of the building may have compromised its fire resistance prior to the test. Officials said the door manufacturer was Masterdor and the type was called “Manse”, but it is not clear whether other doors in the building were of the same type. Government officials said further investigations were needed to establish if the heat in the rest of the building may have compromised its fire resistance prior to the test.
Kensington and Chelsea Council acknowledged that the doors tested “provided less protection than guidelines recommend” but called the results inconclusive and suggested that the wider safety implications were not yet clear.Kensington and Chelsea Council acknowledged that the doors tested “provided less protection than guidelines recommend” but called the results inconclusive and suggested that the wider safety implications were not yet clear.
A spokesperson added: “We understand this news will be of particular concern to residents in this borough, which is why we are urging the Government to move as quickly as it can to give us clarity about the situation.”A spokesperson added: “We understand this news will be of particular concern to residents in this borough, which is why we are urging the Government to move as quickly as it can to give us clarity about the situation.”
The discovery comes 10 months after the fire, shortly after which it emerged the aluminium composite cladding and synthetic insulation installed in 2014 were also combustible.The discovery comes 10 months after the fire, shortly after which it emerged the aluminium composite cladding and synthetic insulation installed in 2014 were also combustible.
A police spokesman said: “We have previously described that our forensic examination at the scene would be followed by a phase of offsite testing to be conducted by experts on our behalf.A police spokesman said: “We have previously described that our forensic examination at the scene would be followed by a phase of offsite testing to be conducted by experts on our behalf.
“A part of this investigation experts tested a flat front door taken from Grenfell Tower. The door tested was designed to resist fire for up to 30 minutes but during the test it was only found to resist the fire for approximately 15 minutes – a much shorter period than expected.“A part of this investigation experts tested a flat front door taken from Grenfell Tower. The door tested was designed to resist fire for up to 30 minutes but during the test it was only found to resist the fire for approximately 15 minutes – a much shorter period than expected.
“The forensic examination and the testing phase is ongoing and we are not unable to comment as to the potential impact or otherwise that any test result may have on the overall criminal investigation.“The forensic examination and the testing phase is ongoing and we are not unable to comment as to the potential impact or otherwise that any test result may have on the overall criminal investigation.
“We have shared our information with the Ministry of Housing, Communities and Local Government as the appropriate government departments, so they are able to take any action required.”“We have shared our information with the Ministry of Housing, Communities and Local Government as the appropriate government departments, so they are able to take any action required.”
Natasha Elcock from the survivors’ group Grenfell United said: “It’s shocking – first the cladding and insulation then the doors. Who knows what else is putting people’s lives at risk? It’s time people lives are taken more seriously – and that includes everyone from every walk of life.Natasha Elcock from the survivors’ group Grenfell United said: “It’s shocking – first the cladding and insulation then the doors. Who knows what else is putting people’s lives at risk? It’s time people lives are taken more seriously – and that includes everyone from every walk of life.
“People’s homes must be made absolutely safe for them and their children. The government should have improved regulations after previous fires. We can’t listen to any more excuses.“People’s homes must be made absolutely safe for them and their children. The government should have improved regulations after previous fires. We can’t listen to any more excuses.
“Grenfell United will not stop campaigning until the lessons of Grenfell are learnt. Nothing can bring our loved ones back but we must make sure a fire like this never happens again.”“Grenfell United will not stop campaigning until the lessons of Grenfell are learnt. Nothing can bring our loved ones back but we must make sure a fire like this never happens again.”
Grenfell Tower fireGrenfell Tower fire
LondonLondon
HousingHousing
Social housingSocial housing
CommunitiesCommunities
newsnews
Share on FacebookShare on Facebook
Share on TwitterShare on Twitter
Share via EmailShare via Email
Share on LinkedInShare on LinkedIn
Share on PinterestShare on Pinterest
Share on Google+Share on Google+
Share on WhatsAppShare on WhatsApp
Share on MessengerShare on Messenger
Reuse this contentReuse this content