This article is from the source 'nytimes' and was first published or seen on . It last changed over 40 days ago and won't be checked again for changes.
You can find the current article at its original source at https://www.nytimes.com/2018/03/30/us/noor-salman-pulse-trial-verdict.html
The article has changed 6 times. There is an RSS feed of changes available.
| Version 2 | Version 3 |
|---|---|
| Noor Salman Acquitted in Pulse Nightclub Shooting | Noor Salman Acquitted in Pulse Nightclub Shooting |
| (about 4 hours later) | |
| ORLANDO, Fla. — Noor Salman, the widow of the man who gunned down dozens of people at the Pulse nightclub two years ago, was found not guilty by a federal jury on Friday of helping her husband carry out a terrorist attack in the name of the Islamic State. | ORLANDO, Fla. — Noor Salman, the widow of the man who gunned down dozens of people at the Pulse nightclub two years ago, was found not guilty by a federal jury on Friday of helping her husband carry out a terrorist attack in the name of the Islamic State. |
| Jurors acquitted Ms. Salman on charges of aiding and abetting the commission of a terrorist act in the 2016 mass shooting and also found her not guilty of obstructing justice. She had been accused of giving misleading statements to law enforcement officers who interviewed her after the massacre, the worst terrorist attack on American soil since Sept. 11, 2001. At the time, it was also the deadliest mass shooting in modern United States history. | Jurors acquitted Ms. Salman on charges of aiding and abetting the commission of a terrorist act in the 2016 mass shooting and also found her not guilty of obstructing justice. She had been accused of giving misleading statements to law enforcement officers who interviewed her after the massacre, the worst terrorist attack on American soil since Sept. 11, 2001. At the time, it was also the deadliest mass shooting in modern United States history. |
| Ms. Salman, 31, had faced a sentence of up to life in prison if convicted. | Ms. Salman, 31, had faced a sentence of up to life in prison if convicted. |
| The verdict marked a rare setback for federal prosecutors, who have a strong record of winning convictions in terrorism trials — even more so because Ms. Salman had faced a jury in Orlando, Fla., the city where her husband’s shooting spree left 49 people dead and 53 others injured. | The verdict marked a rare setback for federal prosecutors, who have a strong record of winning convictions in terrorism trials — even more so because Ms. Salman had faced a jury in Orlando, Fla., the city where her husband’s shooting spree left 49 people dead and 53 others injured. |
| The jury deliberated for a little more than 12 hours over three days before reaching their verdict Friday morning. | The jury deliberated for a little more than 12 hours over three days before reaching their verdict Friday morning. |
| Ms. Salman wiped tears from her eyes after the verdict on the first charge was read. By the time the judge’s clerk announced the final “not guilty,” Ms. Salman openly sobbed. So did a cousin and two uncles, seated two rows behind her in the courtroom. One uncle nearly leapt out of his seat. Ms. Salman, her face red and blotchy with emotion, turned around to look at them. | Ms. Salman wiped tears from her eyes after the verdict on the first charge was read. By the time the judge’s clerk announced the final “not guilty,” Ms. Salman openly sobbed. So did a cousin and two uncles, seated two rows behind her in the courtroom. One uncle nearly leapt out of his seat. Ms. Salman, her face red and blotchy with emotion, turned around to look at them. |
| Defense attorneys hugged Ms. Salman. They, too, wept. | Defense attorneys hugged Ms. Salman. They, too, wept. |
| Across the courtroom, Pulse victims and their families sat in stone-faced silence. | Across the courtroom, Pulse victims and their families sat in stone-faced silence. |
| “It was a difficult case for all sides involved,” Judge Paul G. Byron of the United States District Court for the Middle District of Florida said. | “It was a difficult case for all sides involved,” Judge Paul G. Byron of the United States District Court for the Middle District of Florida said. |
| In a brief statement to reporters outside the courthouse, Sarah C. Sweeney, an assistant United States attorney who helped prosecute the case, thanked jurors for their work. “We respect their verdict,” she said. | In a brief statement to reporters outside the courthouse, Sarah C. Sweeney, an assistant United States attorney who helped prosecute the case, thanked jurors for their work. “We respect their verdict,” she said. |
| The families of the victims left the courthouse as a group, some of them wearing dark sunglasses. They declined to comment. | The families of the victims left the courthouse as a group, some of them wearing dark sunglasses. They declined to comment. |
| Ms. Salman’s family members said they were overjoyed by the verdict but continued to grieve for the Pulse victims. | Ms. Salman’s family members said they were overjoyed by the verdict but continued to grieve for the Pulse victims. |
| “I feel so sad for them,” said Susan Adieh, Ms. Salman’s cousin. She added that a guilty verdict would not have brought back the dead but would have forced Ms. Salman to pay for her husband’s mass murder. “We can’t commit another innocent person as well.” | “I feel so sad for them,” said Susan Adieh, Ms. Salman’s cousin. She added that a guilty verdict would not have brought back the dead but would have forced Ms. Salman to pay for her husband’s mass murder. “We can’t commit another innocent person as well.” |
| “I want to say thank you: Thank you, Lord,” Al Salman, one of Ms. Salman’s uncles, told reporters outside the courtroom. He said he looked forward to taking his niece home to her son, now 5 and living with relatives in California: “That’s the only thing she has in her life, her son.” | “I want to say thank you: Thank you, Lord,” Al Salman, one of Ms. Salman’s uncles, told reporters outside the courtroom. He said he looked forward to taking his niece home to her son, now 5 and living with relatives in California: “That’s the only thing she has in her life, her son.” |
| Al Salman also said he intended to hire a therapist to help Ms. Salman rebuild her life. “I don’t know how she’s going to make up for two years,” he said. | Al Salman also said he intended to hire a therapist to help Ms. Salman rebuild her life. “I don’t know how she’s going to make up for two years,” he said. |
| “I said that Day 1, that she’s innocent,” Mr. Salman said. “I came here to tell you I told you so.” | “I said that Day 1, that she’s innocent,” Mr. Salman said. “I came here to tell you I told you so.” |
| Ms. Salmon was released later in the day and left in a car with one of her lawyers. She covered her face in her hands as reporters plied her with questions. Later, a family spokeswoman, Susan Clary, tweeted a photo of Ms. Salman with her defense team. | |
| “The family is elated. Noor can go home now to her son, Zak, resume her life and try to pick up the pieces from two years in jail,” Ms. Clary said in a statement read to reporters. “We really hope the best for her future and want people to know that she is not guilty. She is innocent. For those people who still think that there’s a question — there is no question. A judge has decided.” | |
| Barbara Poma, the Pulse nightclub owner who launched the OnePulse Foundation to establish a memorial to the victims of the massacre, said the verdict “cannot and will not divide us.” | |
| “Those of us directly affected by this tragedy must find peace in our hearts and remember that he was the one who pulled the trigger that night. He was the perpetrator, and he should not have one more minute of power over our lives,” she said in a statement. | |
| From the start, Ms. Salman had insisted she had nothing to do with her husband Omar Mateen’s rampage. Prosecutors built a convincing case that Mr. Mateen methodically made arrangements for the attack, apparently inspired by the ISIS propaganda he obsessively consumed online. But they were less successful in tying Ms. Salman to his actions. | From the start, Ms. Salman had insisted she had nothing to do with her husband Omar Mateen’s rampage. Prosecutors built a convincing case that Mr. Mateen methodically made arrangements for the attack, apparently inspired by the ISIS propaganda he obsessively consumed online. But they were less successful in tying Ms. Salman to his actions. |
| Prosecutors relied on a confession Ms. Salman gave F.B.I. agents in which she admitted she had known about her husband acquiring weapons, watching Islamic State videos and discussing possible locations in apparent preparation for the June 12, 2016, attack. Defense lawyers argued that Ms. Salman’s statement, obtained after more than 11 hours of questioning without a lawyer present, amounted to a false confession. Ms. Salman told investigators that she and Mr. Mateen scouted Pulse as a target, yet investigators found no evidence to corroborate that. | Prosecutors relied on a confession Ms. Salman gave F.B.I. agents in which she admitted she had known about her husband acquiring weapons, watching Islamic State videos and discussing possible locations in apparent preparation for the June 12, 2016, attack. Defense lawyers argued that Ms. Salman’s statement, obtained after more than 11 hours of questioning without a lawyer present, amounted to a false confession. Ms. Salman told investigators that she and Mr. Mateen scouted Pulse as a target, yet investigators found no evidence to corroborate that. |
| “She was a suspect, and they wanted to get a confession — except that she was still denying that she knew anything,” a defense lawyer, Charles D. Swift, said during his closing argument on Wednesday. | “She was a suspect, and they wanted to get a confession — except that she was still denying that she knew anything,” a defense lawyer, Charles D. Swift, said during his closing argument on Wednesday. |
| Jurors were asked to decide whether Ms. Salman had aided and abetted her husband’s support of a foreign terrorist organization. | Jurors were asked to decide whether Ms. Salman had aided and abetted her husband’s support of a foreign terrorist organization. |
| James D. Mandolfo, an assistant United States attorney, acknowledged during his opening statement on March 14 that the case against Ms. Salman was not built around a single incriminating fact but rather on the “totality” of evidence regarding her support of Mr. Mateen. | James D. Mandolfo, an assistant United States attorney, acknowledged during his opening statement on March 14 that the case against Ms. Salman was not built around a single incriminating fact but rather on the “totality” of evidence regarding her support of Mr. Mateen. |
| Delivering the prosecution’s closing argument on Wednesday, Ms. Sweeney pointed to unusually high spending and cash withdrawals by the couple in the 11 days leading up the shooting, totaling more than the $30,500 Mr. Mateen made in a year as a security guard. The couple, whose son was 3 at the time, also added Ms. Salman as a death beneficiary to Mr. Mateen’s bank account, where they expected to soon receive a federal income tax refund. | Delivering the prosecution’s closing argument on Wednesday, Ms. Sweeney pointed to unusually high spending and cash withdrawals by the couple in the 11 days leading up the shooting, totaling more than the $30,500 Mr. Mateen made in a year as a security guard. The couple, whose son was 3 at the time, also added Ms. Salman as a death beneficiary to Mr. Mateen’s bank account, where they expected to soon receive a federal income tax refund. |
| But the jury of seven women and five men appeared to have been persuaded by the defense, which cast Ms. Salman as a naïve woman of limited intelligence, kept in the dark by a scheming husband who cheated on her, knew she did not share his radicalized views and did not need her assistance to carry out his deadly plot. Her lawyers argued that Mr. Mateen had no reason to ask his wife for help — and Ms. Salman had no reason to provide it. | But the jury of seven women and five men appeared to have been persuaded by the defense, which cast Ms. Salman as a naïve woman of limited intelligence, kept in the dark by a scheming husband who cheated on her, knew she did not share his radicalized views and did not need her assistance to carry out his deadly plot. Her lawyers argued that Mr. Mateen had no reason to ask his wife for help — and Ms. Salman had no reason to provide it. |
| “Why would Omar Mateen confide in Noor, a woman he clearly had no respect for?” Linda Moreno, a defense lawyer, asked the jury. | “Why would Omar Mateen confide in Noor, a woman he clearly had no respect for?” Linda Moreno, a defense lawyer, asked the jury. |
| In the hours before the attack, Ms. Salman made plans to visit family and friends in California, telephoning them to ask about arrangements and presents, and browsed for leather jackets online. She had dinner at Applebee’s and was home in her pajamas, texting her husband about his whereabouts late into the night. | In the hours before the attack, Ms. Salman made plans to visit family and friends in California, telephoning them to ask about arrangements and presents, and browsed for leather jackets online. She had dinner at Applebee’s and was home in her pajamas, texting her husband about his whereabouts late into the night. |
| Ms. Salman did not testify during the trial. On Wednesday, after eight days of witness testimony, Judge Byron asked Ms. Salman if remaining silent had been her own decision. “Yes,” she responded. | Ms. Salman did not testify during the trial. On Wednesday, after eight days of witness testimony, Judge Byron asked Ms. Salman if remaining silent had been her own decision. “Yes,” she responded. |
| The trial, which drew Pulse victims and their families to the federal courthouse in downtown Orlando, included graphic video of the nightclub massacre recorded by surveillance cameras, police body cameras and victims’ cellphones. | The trial, which drew Pulse victims and their families to the federal courthouse in downtown Orlando, included graphic video of the nightclub massacre recorded by surveillance cameras, police body cameras and victims’ cellphones. |
| After prosecutors rested their case, they disclosed to the defense that Mr. Mateen’s father, Seddique Mateen, had been an F.B.I. informer at various times from January 2005 to the time of the attack. He is now under criminal investigation for financial transfers to Turkey and Afghanistan he made shortly before the shooting. | After prosecutors rested their case, they disclosed to the defense that Mr. Mateen’s father, Seddique Mateen, had been an F.B.I. informer at various times from January 2005 to the time of the attack. He is now under criminal investigation for financial transfers to Turkey and Afghanistan he made shortly before the shooting. |
| Closing arguments from both the prosecution and the defense centered on Ms. Salman’s three statements to the F.B.I. No audio or video recordings were made of the statements, and she wrote only a portion of one of them herself; the rest were dictated to an F.B.I. agent and initialed by Ms. Salman. | Closing arguments from both the prosecution and the defense centered on Ms. Salman’s three statements to the F.B.I. No audio or video recordings were made of the statements, and she wrote only a portion of one of them herself; the rest were dictated to an F.B.I. agent and initialed by Ms. Salman. |
| In them, she admitted she should have reported her husband’s suspicious activities. “I wish I had done the right thing, but my fear held me back,” she wrote. “I wish I had been more truthful.” | In them, she admitted she should have reported her husband’s suspicious activities. “I wish I had done the right thing, but my fear held me back,” she wrote. “I wish I had been more truthful.” |
| A defense expert testified that Ms. Salman was highly susceptible to intimidation. Ms. Moreno, the defense attorney, suggested Ms. Salman’s words, particularly about casing Pulse with Mr. Mateen, had been “planted.” GPS data from her cellphone later showed she had not driven by the nightclub with her husband. | A defense expert testified that Ms. Salman was highly susceptible to intimidation. Ms. Moreno, the defense attorney, suggested Ms. Salman’s words, particularly about casing Pulse with Mr. Mateen, had been “planted.” GPS data from her cellphone later showed she had not driven by the nightclub with her husband. |
| The defense contended that Ms. Salman mentioned Pulse under duress because investigators sought someone to blame in the case. But on Wednesday, Ms. Sweeney offered a new explanation: Ms. Salman incorrectly thought Pulse was at the Disney World theme park, which the couple did visit. | The defense contended that Ms. Salman mentioned Pulse under duress because investigators sought someone to blame in the case. But on Wednesday, Ms. Sweeney offered a new explanation: Ms. Salman incorrectly thought Pulse was at the Disney World theme park, which the couple did visit. |
| “He was not intending to go to the Pulse nightclub,” Ms. Sweeney said. “Instead, the target of his attack was Disney.” | “He was not intending to go to the Pulse nightclub,” Ms. Sweeney said. “Instead, the target of his attack was Disney.” |
| Offering an especially chilling detail, Ms. Sweeney suggested that Mr. Mateen bought a baby carriage and doll at a Walmart the night before the massacre so that he could conceal his AR-15 assault rifle and draw no suspicion as he walked toward what prosecutors believe was his intended target, the Disney Springs shopping and entertainment complex, formerly known as Downtown Disney. | Offering an especially chilling detail, Ms. Sweeney suggested that Mr. Mateen bought a baby carriage and doll at a Walmart the night before the massacre so that he could conceal his AR-15 assault rifle and draw no suspicion as he walked toward what prosecutors believe was his intended target, the Disney Springs shopping and entertainment complex, formerly known as Downtown Disney. |
| On the night of the attack, Mr. Mateen went to the House of Blues at Disney Springs, GPS data and surveillance footage showed. Spooked by the heavy security, he got back in his rental van and searched for downtown Orlando nightclubs on Google. The second hit was Pulse, a gay nightclub with a popular Saturday Latin night. | On the night of the attack, Mr. Mateen went to the House of Blues at Disney Springs, GPS data and surveillance footage showed. Spooked by the heavy security, he got back in his rental van and searched for downtown Orlando nightclubs on Google. The second hit was Pulse, a gay nightclub with a popular Saturday Latin night. |
| “It’s a horrible, random, senseless killing by a monster. But it wasn’t preplanned,” Mr. Swift said. “And if he didn’t know, she couldn’t know.” | “It’s a horrible, random, senseless killing by a monster. But it wasn’t preplanned,” Mr. Swift said. “And if he didn’t know, she couldn’t know.” |
| After the verdict, defense lawyers pointed to the prosecution’s Disney explanation as a crucial indication that the government was struggling to make its case. | After the verdict, defense lawyers pointed to the prosecution’s Disney explanation as a crucial indication that the government was struggling to make its case. |
| “The more we learned, the better Noor Salman looked,” said Mr. Swift, who criticized the F.B.I. for failing to record its interview with her after the shooting. “It is ridiculous that they don’t,” he said. “The process being followed by the F.B.I. is antiquated.” | “The more we learned, the better Noor Salman looked,” said Mr. Swift, who criticized the F.B.I. for failing to record its interview with her after the shooting. “It is ridiculous that they don’t,” he said. “The process being followed by the F.B.I. is antiquated.” |