This article is from the source 'nytimes' and was first published or seen on . It last changed over 40 days ago and won't be checked again for changes.

You can find the current article at its original source at https://www.nytimes.com/2018/04/03/world/asia/india-fake-news.html

The article has changed 4 times. There is an RSS feed of changes available.

Version 0 Version 1
India Backs Down From Threat to Penalize Journalists Over ‘Fake News’ India Threatens Penalties for Journalists Who Spread ‘Fake News,’ Then Reverses Itself
(about 7 hours later)
NEW DELHI — Facing strong criticism, the Indian government on Tuesday withdrew new rules under which journalists found to have written or broadcast “fake news” would lose their official accreditation, in some cases permanently. NEW DELHI — The Indian government called the decree a crackdown on fake news. It lasted less than a day.
The retraction came less than a day after the rules were announced on Monday evening. Rajat Sharma, the president of the News Broadcasters Association, which would have handled complaints against television journalists, confirmed the retraction and said the decision came from Prime Minister Narendra Modi’s office. On Monday evening, the Ministry of Information and Broadcasting abruptly announced that it would penalize journalists who spread “fake news,” the term popularized by President Trump to disparage what he has regarded as unfair coverage of his 2016 American presidential campaign and first year in office.
The government provided no official explanation for why the amendment setting out the new rules was withdrawn. The term is now widely used around the world by authoritarian politicians and governments to describe reporting that they find objectionable.
Many in the Indian news media saw the new rules as an attack on the press, noting that journalists critical of leaders from Mr. Modi’s Bharatiya Janata Party had come under pressure since the party came to power in 2014. Some noted that the amendment had been released months before campaigning was set to begin for national elections in 2019. Members of India’s freewheeling press expressed shock and outrage at the announcement, seeing the hidden hand of Prime Minister Narendra Modi who enjoys warm relations with Mr. Trump to quell negative media coverage ahead of India’s general election next year.
Within hours of the reaction, Mr. Modi’s government annulled the announcement without explanation on Tuesday morning. “Press Release regarding Fake News uploaded last evening stands withdrawn,” the Ministry of Information and Broadcasting said on its website.
The U-turn was welcomed by free-press advocates who worry about what they see as a global threat in the guise of prohibitions on news deemed by governments to be false. Malaysia’s lower house of Parliament just approved a measure threatening spreaders of “fake news” with prison sentences.
But some Indian journalists said the original announcement might have been meant to test the tolerance of news media outlets for more restrictions. They noted that journalists critical of leaders from Mr. Modi’s Bharatiya Janata Party had been under pressure since the party came to power in 2014.
The original announcement said journalists found to have written or broadcast “fake news” would lose their official accreditation.
“Make no mistake: this is a breathtaking assault on mainstream media,” Shekhar Gupta, a prominent journalist, wrote on Twitter before the amendment was withdrawn.“Make no mistake: this is a breathtaking assault on mainstream media,” Shekhar Gupta, a prominent journalist, wrote on Twitter before the amendment was withdrawn.
Critics of the rules pointed out that the government’s proposal did not apply to independent or partisan digital media platforms, some of which are seen in India as major disseminators of fake news. These platforms are not regulated by the Press Council of India or the News Broadcasters Association. Instead, the rules would have been felt primarily by large, established outlets. The penalties in the original announcement did not apply to independent or partisan digital media outlets, some of them regarded in India as major disseminators of fake news. These platforms are not regulated by the two main media regulatory bodies, the Press Council of India or the News Broadcasters Association. Instead, the rules would have been felt primarily by large, established outlets.
In its statement Monday, which has since been taken offline, India’s Ministry of Information and Broadcasting said that guidelines for the accreditation of journalists were being amended to counter “increasing instances of fake news in various mediums.” The statement did not define fake news or provide guidelines for who could lodge complaints against journalists. In its original announcement, since taken offline, the Ministry of Information and Broadcasting said that guidelines for the accreditation of journalists were being amended to counter “increasing instances of fake news in various mediums.” The statement did not define fake news or provide guidelines about who could lodge complaints against journalists.
The statement said a journalist’s accreditation would be revoked for six months after a first violation, one year after a second violation and permanently after three violations. It also said that once a complaint against a journalist was registered, his or her accreditation would be suspended until a determination had been made.The statement said a journalist’s accreditation would be revoked for six months after a first violation, one year after a second violation and permanently after three violations. It also said that once a complaint against a journalist was registered, his or her accreditation would be suspended until a determination had been made.
Accredited journalists in India face fewer security clearances when visiting government offices and are eligible for subsidized train travel, among other benefits. An accreditation is not required in India but is regarded as critical for access to news makers. Accredited journalists in India face fewer security clearances when visiting government offices and are eligible for subsidized train travel, among other benefits.
Smriti Irani, who heads the Ministry of Information and Broadcasting, had said on Twitter that complaints against journalists would be handled by two media regulatory bodies, the Press Council of India and the News Broadcasters Association. She said neither body was controlled by the government. Smriti Irani, who runs the Ministry of Information and Broadcasting, had said on Twitter that complaints against journalists would be handled by t the Press Council of India and the News Broadcasters Association. She said neither body was controlled by the government.
Mr. Sharma, the president of the News Broadcasters Association, said that his group had not been consulted about the amendment before it was announced on Monday. M. V. Shreyams Kumar, the vice president of the association, called the amendment “ridiculous.” Rajat Sharma, the president of the News Broadcasters Association, said that his group had not been consulted before the announcement on Monday. M. V. Shreyams Kumar, the vice president of the association, called the announcement “ridiculous.”
“This whole exercise is to curb the freedom of the press,” Mr. Kumar said by telephone. “This whole exercise is to curb the freedom of the press,” Mr. Kumar said.
Ms. Irani, after arguing the measure’s merits on Twitter with journalists and opposition figures, was taking a more conciliatory tone by midday Tuesday, inviting journalists to meet with her and provide “suggestions so that together we can fight the menace of ‘fake news’ & uphold ethical journalism.”Ms. Irani, after arguing the measure’s merits on Twitter with journalists and opposition figures, was taking a more conciliatory tone by midday Tuesday, inviting journalists to meet with her and provide “suggestions so that together we can fight the menace of ‘fake news’ & uphold ethical journalism.”
President Trump’s tendency to dismiss critical news coverage as “fake news” has been emulated by various leaders in Asia and elsewhere. On Monday, Malaysia’s lower house of Parliament passed a bill that would make the distribution of misleading information punishable by up to six years in prison. As in India, critics of the measure characterized it as an attempt to stifle legitimate journalism.
Raj Kamal Jha, the chief editor of The Indian Express, said, “Of course, fake news pollutes public discourse but whose fake news is it anyway?”Raj Kamal Jha, the chief editor of The Indian Express, said, “Of course, fake news pollutes public discourse but whose fake news is it anyway?”
“Spin, cheap shot, empty boast, outright lie, innocent mistake, an oversight — who gets to decide what’s fake, what’s not?” he continued. “That’s why the government’s order last night using fake news as an excuse to punish journalists was an assault on the freedom of the press.”“Spin, cheap shot, empty boast, outright lie, innocent mistake, an oversight — who gets to decide what’s fake, what’s not?” he continued. “That’s why the government’s order last night using fake news as an excuse to punish journalists was an assault on the freedom of the press.”
The Indian Express reported on Tuesday that at least 13 government ministers, including Ms. Irani, had tweeted a link to an article claiming to have exposed “four major fake news stories.” The article, on a website called The True Picture, accused “sections of the media” of supporting the opposition and trying to portray the government and the Bharatiya Janata Party in a bad light.The Indian Express reported on Tuesday that at least 13 government ministers, including Ms. Irani, had tweeted a link to an article claiming to have exposed “four major fake news stories.” The article, on a website called The True Picture, accused “sections of the media” of supporting the opposition and trying to portray the government and the Bharatiya Janata Party in a bad light.
The Indian Express reported that the website shared a phone number with a company involved in publishing a children’s book written by Mr. Modi. Employees of the company, Bluekraft Digital Foundation, said they did not run the website.The Indian Express reported that the website shared a phone number with a company involved in publishing a children’s book written by Mr. Modi. Employees of the company, Bluekraft Digital Foundation, said they did not run the website.