This article is from the source 'rtcom' and was first published or seen on . It last changed over 40 days ago and won't be checked again for changes.

You can find the current article at its original source at https://www.rt.com/uk/423911-opcw-skripal-russia-investigation/

The article has changed 5 times. There is an RSS feed of changes available.

Version 2 Version 3
OPCW confirms British findings over substance used in Salisbury poisoning OPCW backs UK findings over nerve agent used in Salisbury poisoning, but doesn't identify source
(35 minutes later)
The OPCW has released its findings into the Skripal poisoning, with the watchdog confirming the UK's conclusions over the nerve agent used. It did not elaborate on the origin of the substance, only detailing its chemical make-up. The OPCW has confirmed the UK's conclusions about the type of nerve agent used in the poisoning of Sergei and Yulia Skripal, but provided no new evidence to back up Britain's claim that Russia was to blame for the attack.
The Organization for the Prohibition of Chemical Weapons (OPCW) published a summary of its analysis, which confirmed the British findings on the nerve agent used in last month's poisoning of former Russian double agent Sergei Skripal his daughter Yulia and a police officer who assisted them, in the English city of Salisbury. The Organization for the Prohibition of Chemical Weapons (OPCW) published a summary of its analysis, which confirmed the British findings about the nerve agent used in last month's poisoning of former Russian double agent Sergei Skripal, his daughter Yulia and a police officer who assisted them in Salisbury.
Despite claims of Russian 'culpability' for the poisoning the report doesn't assign blame for the incident.   Despite the British government's claims of Russian 'culpability' for the poisoning, nowhere does the OPCW's report assign blame for the incident or even identify the source of the agent. 
The testing was carried out by four laboratories affiliated with the OPCW at Britain’s request. The watchdog used their own samples gathered from the victims of the poisoning and contaminated environmental matter.  The part of the report that has been released publicly does not even specifically name Novichok as being the substance used, although it says it does name the substance in the parts of the findings which remain classified.
The watchdog's executive summary of the report did not specifically name the chemical agent in the summary of its findings, although said it has been named in the full classified report.   Despite no new evidence being provided, the UK's Foreign Secretary Boris Johnson immediately claimed the OPCW's findings meant there was “no doubt” of Russia’s responsibility for the incident. Johnson demanded that Russia “give answers” as “only Russia has the means, motive and record [for the poisoning].”
Last week, Johnson faced accusations of misleading the British public after he said in a televised interview that scientists at the government's military laboratory, Porton Down, had told him the nerve agent definitely came from Russia. The lab’s chief executive later said they had done no such thing.
The OPCW used their own samples gathered from the victims of the poisoning and contaminated environmental matter to put together its conclusions. 
"The results of analysis by OPCW-designated laboratories of environmental and biomedical samples collected by the OPCW team confirm the findings of the United Kingdom relating to the identity of the toxic chemical that was used in Salisbury and severely injured three people", the OPCW said."The results of analysis by OPCW-designated laboratories of environmental and biomedical samples collected by the OPCW team confirm the findings of the United Kingdom relating to the identity of the toxic chemical that was used in Salisbury and severely injured three people", the OPCW said.
The watchdog also found "the toxic chemical was of high purity" because of an "almost complete absence of impurities."The watchdog also found "the toxic chemical was of high purity" because of an "almost complete absence of impurities."
UK Prime Minister Theresa May declared on March 12 that the Skripals had been poisoned with a military-grade nerve agent identified as A-234, also known as Novichok.  UK Prime Minister Theresa May declared on March 12 that the Skripals had been poisoned with a military-grade nerve agent identified as A-234, also known as Novichok.  
The part of the report that has been released does not specifically name Novichok, and it does not suggest where the nerve agent may have come from.  
UK Foreign Secretary Boris Johnson, however, claimed the findings meant that there was “no doubt” of Russia’s responsibility for the incident. Johnson demanded that Russia “give answers” as “only Russia has the means, motive and record [for the poisoning].”
Last week, Johnson faced accusations of misleading the British public after he said in a televised interview that scientists at the government's military laboratory, Porton Down, had told him the nerve agent definitely came from Russia. The lab’s chief executive later said they had done no such thing.
Russia has consistently denied any involvement in the poisoning. Kremlin spokesperson Dmitry Peskov said Britain would have to apologize to Russia for its “mad accusations.”Russia has consistently denied any involvement in the poisoning. Kremlin spokesperson Dmitry Peskov said Britain would have to apologize to Russia for its “mad accusations.”
The OPCW will hold a special session on the incident next Wednesday.The OPCW will hold a special session on the incident next Wednesday.
Think your friends would be interested? Share this story!Think your friends would be interested? Share this story!